Agentic Multimodal Model

• Agentic multimodal models are advanced AI systems that dynamically solve complex tasks by integrating autonomous planning, tool invocation, and multi-modal perception.
• They employ reinforcement learning and compositional workflows to optimize decision-making across vision, language, audio, and structured data.
• These models enhance task adaptability and performance in diverse applications such as medical diagnosis, research synthesis, and autonomous navigation.

An agentic multimodal model is a class of artificial intelligence system designed to solve complex tasks by dynamically combining autonomous planning, proactive tool invocation, and environment interaction across multiple modalities such as vision, language, audio, and structured data. Such models are distinguished by their ability to operate beyond static pipeline execution, instead leveraging reinforcement learning, compositional workflows, and explicit reasoning to integrate perceptual and symbolic resources, external tools, and iterative feedback, enabling the model to flexibly adjust its strategies in response to evolving task demands. Below, the concept is elaborated from foundational principles to key implementation approaches, evaluation paradigms, representative applications, and emerging frontiers.

1. Conceptual Foundations and Core Characteristics

Agentic multimodal models differ from conventional multimodal LLM (MLLM) agents by recasting task execution as an interactive Markov Decision Process (MDP) incorporating dynamic state observations $s_t$, learned policy-driven action selection $a_t \sim \pi(a|s_t)$, reward-based learning, and explicit memory, reflection, and reasoning modules (Yao et al., 13 Oct 2025). Canonical agentic models exhibit three essential capabilities:

1. Internal intelligence: On-policy self-planning, multi-step chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, iterative self-reflection, and memory. Agents not only generate outputs but also maintain long-horizon, context-evolving plans, adapting their reasoning paths as new information becomes available (Guo et al., 19 Nov 2025, Ding et al., 4 Dec 2025).
2. External tool invocation: The ability to autonomously select, parameterize, and call external APIs, retrieval systems, or code execution engines at each decision step, using the outputs to inform further reasoning. Tools span perception (image crop/zoom, document/page retrieval), computation (Python, math), verification (instruction/citation checkers), and information access (web search, database queries) (Ding et al., 4 Dec 2025, Hong et al., 7 Nov 2025, Zhang et al., 2 Dec 2025).
3. Environment interaction: Actions are not limited to generating static text/image outputs, but include manipulating or navigating in virtual/physical environments, interacting with GUIs, or engaging in iterative, context-aware exchanges with other agents or users.

The agentic approach contrasts with static, hard-coded task decomposition, allowing for context-dependent, recursive reasoning and adaptive tool selection. Model execution is typically formulated as:

$$s_{t+1} = \delta(s_t, a_t), \qquad a_t \sim \pi(a|s_t)$$

where $\pi$ is optimized to maximize cumulative expected reward, often through deep reinforcement learning or reward model alignment (Ding et al., 4 Dec 2025, Tan et al., 3 Dec 2025).

2. System Architectures and Reasoning Loops

A typical agentic multimodal model is composed of the following modules:

• Vision-language backbone: Multiscale transformers or hybrid architectures, often integrating frozen or finetuned vision encoders (e.g., ViT, CLIP) with LLM decoders for unified processing of image, text, and other modalities (Ding et al., 4 Dec 2025, Hong et al., 7 Nov 2025).
• Agentic decision loop: An explicit "think–act–observe" loop (ReAct paradigm) wherein, at every step $i$, the model generates an internal thought $\theta_i$, selects an action $t_i$ (tool call or answer) based on context, and incorporates the subsequent external tool observation $o_i$ into the next step's context (Ding et al., 4 Dec 2025, Guo et al., 19 Nov 2025).
• Tool interfacing and execution: Unified APIs for invoking external operations, using open function-calling schemas or workflow orchestration graphs. Tool outputs (text, images, code, or structured objects) are indexed and referenced throughout the trajectory.
• Indexed memory maps: Persistent memory for intermediate results (e.g., text_map, imgs_map), supporting retrieval or composition in long, branched reasoning chains (Ding et al., 4 Dec 2025, Zhang et al., 2 Dec 2025).
• Capability orchestration: Some systems (e.g., Octopus) explicitly factor the reasoning process into interpretable capability modules, such as perception, augmentation, spatial/geometric logic, code/programmatic reasoning, and visual transformation (Guo et al., 19 Nov 2025).

The agentic workflow can be generalized as a tupled trajectory $$\tau = \{(\theta_0, t_0, o_0), \ldots, (\theta_L, t_L, o_L)\}$$, with the policy $\pi$ implicitly parameterized over the transformer backbone, state/action history, and tool outputs.

3. Learning Algorithms and Optimization Strategies

Agentic multimodal models are typically trained with multi-stage pipelines:

1. Supervised pretraining/fine-tuning (SFT): Cold-start stage using cross-entropy loss to learn chain-of-thought, tool call syntax, and reasoning patterns from curated datasets, including tool-centric tasks, difficult examples, or expert trajectories (Hong et al., 7 Nov 2025, Zhang et al., 2 Dec 2025).
2. Reinforcement learning (RL): RL fine-tuning maximizes custom reward functions that account for answer correctness, format compliance, tool use (and sometimes efficiency or interpretability). For example, ARM-Thinker uses a two-stage reward function $R(\tau)$ with tool call encouragement and answer accuracy (Ding et al., 4 Dec 2025); DeepEyesV2 augments this with accuracy and format rewards (Hong et al., 7 Nov 2025).
3. Policy optimization methods: Techniques such as Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), DAPO, and hybrid actor-critic are widely used. Reward shaping can incorporate outcome-, process-, and tool-centric objectives, sometimes with agentic verifiers that dynamically select and aggregate scoring functions per sample (e.g., Argos (Tan et al., 3 Dec 2025)).
4. Self-reflection and memory: Mechanisms for explicit or implicit reflection—either during training, as step-level feedback (planner–critic loops), or at inference, supporting iterative hypothesis revision and critiquing (Yao et al., 13 Oct 2025, Fard et al., 28 Oct 2025).
5. Multi-agent composition and safety: For applications involving adversarial robustness or safety alignment (e.g., prompt injection defense, agentic moderation), modular agentic frameworks orchestrate multiple cooperating or verifying agents, each specialized for sanitization, validation, or moderation roles (Syed et al., 29 Dec 2025, Ren et al., 29 Oct 2025).

4. Tool Ecosystems, Modality Integration, and Specialized Agents

Agentic multimodal models derive their flexibility and robustness from the ability to invoke a broad array of tools:

• Vision-language tools: Image crop, region zoom, object or text detection, optical character recognition (OCR), document/image retrieval, and region-based reasoning.
• Textual and structural validators: Instruction-following checkers (e.g., word count, presence of required keywords), answer format verifiers, and logical consistency scoring.
• External APIs and search: Integration with search engines, external knowledge bases, databases, or code execution environments to ground reasoning in up-to-date information.
• Sequential planning and dynamic orchestration: Many frameworks support multi-step plan generation (e.g., JSON-based plans in Skywork-R1V4 (Zhang et al., 2 Dec 2025)), recursive web-grounded verification (MIRAGE (Shopnil et al., 20 Oct 2025)), and layered sequential modules for handling complex agentic evidence gathering or factual checking.
• Multi-agent and modular orchestration: Some systems (e.g., WeaveMuse (Karystinaios, 14 Sep 2025), agentic moderation architectures (Ren et al., 29 Oct 2025)) deploy manager–specialist agent hierarchies to coordinate constraint satisfaction, verify outputs, and perform repair actions as necessary.

Autonomous capability selection and tool invocation is realized not via heuristics but through learned policies, with tool usage decisions optimized end-to-end under task-driven rewards.

5. Evaluation Paradigms and Benchmarks

Agentic multimodal models are subject to comprehensive evaluation suites spanning fine-grained perception, complex reasoning, tool use, document understanding, multi-turn dialogue, and real-world environment interaction:

Benchmark / Suite	Focus Domains	Example Metrics / Tasks
ARMBench-VL (Ding et al., 4 Dec 2025)	Visual grounding, document retrieval, instruction following	Pairwise accuracy, binary correctness
Octopus-Bench (Guo et al., 19 Nov 2025)	Perception, geometry, code, visual creation, navigation	Sub-bench accuracy, ablation impact
RealX-Bench (Hong et al., 7 Nov 2025)	Everyday, search, reasoning, OCR, integration	Exact match, tool use effect
MMSearch, FVQA (Zhang et al., 2 Dec 2025)	Deep multimodal search, knowledge-intensive perception	SOTA accuracy, ablation on planning
AMUsE (Chowdhury et al., 18 Dec 2025)	Audio-visual, dialogue/planner/reflector-fused reasoning	BLEU, METEOR, speaker accuracy
MIRAGE (Shopnil et al., 20 Oct 2025)	Multimodal misinformation detection	F1, calibration, ablation impact

Agentic models demonstrate significant accuracy improvements over non-agentic baselines. For instance, ARM-Thinker achieved +16.2% average gain on reward modeling tasks and +9.6% on tool-use tasks versus base vision-LLMs (Ding et al., 4 Dec 2025); DeepEyesV2 reported +6 to +11 points improvement on real-world multidisciplinary tasks over strong baselines (Hong et al., 7 Nov 2025).

6. Representative Applications and Emerging Directions

Agentic multimodal architectures have demonstrated impact across diverse domains:

• Scientific and medical reasoning: Evidence-seeking models for pathological diagnosis (PathFound (Hua et al., 29 Dec 2025)), real-time wound staging with clinican-style self-reflection (FT-ARM (Fard et al., 28 Oct 2025)), and surgical image enhancement (SurgVisAgent (Lei et al., 3 Jul 2025)).
• Trustworthiness and safety: Systems for prevention of prompt injection (cross-agent provenance control (Syed et al., 29 Dec 2025)), automated moderation (multi-agent design (Ren et al., 29 Oct 2025)), and misinformation detection (web-grounded agentic verification (Shopnil et al., 20 Oct 2025)).
• Music, art, and report generation: Multi-modal music understanding/creation (WeaveMuse (Karystinaios, 14 Sep 2025)), agentic research report synthesis with automated visualization planning (Multimodal DeepResearcher (Yang et al., 3 Jun 2025)).
• Advertising, dialogue, and personalized interaction: Hyper-personalized, competitive agentic advertising at scale (Srinivas et al., 1 Apr 2025), and multi-speaker audio-visual understanding (Chowdhury et al., 18 Dec 2025).
• Robustness and uncertainty quantification: Uncertainty-aware agentic wrappers integrating conformal prediction at tool and answer level (Zhi et al., 11 Mar 2025).

Anticipated advances include richer action/tool spaces (e.g., GUI and video tools), more sophisticated environment interaction (embodied and virtual), end-to-end agent–reward model co-evolution, scaling to larger backbones, and integration of memory and self-reflection for persistent, generalizable agentic intelligence (Yao et al., 13 Oct 2025, Ding et al., 4 Dec 2025, Chowdhury et al., 18 Dec 2025).

7. Limitations and Open Challenges

Notwithstanding empirical progress, current agentic multimodal models face several limitations:

• Restricted to a finite set of tools, typically image/text ops and retrieval; extension to spatio-temporal, video, and full GUI actions is ongoing (Ding et al., 4 Dec 2025, Zhang et al., 2 Dec 2025).
• Increased inference latency due to agentic planning, multiple tool calls, and complex orchestration (Guo et al., 19 Nov 2025).
• Dependence on robust tool output; failures of external modules, propagation of tool errors, or reward misalignment may still degrade global performance (Tan et al., 3 Dec 2025).
• Scalability barriers (context length, memory, online adaptation) and challenges in multi-agent credit assignment, safety, and alignment (Yao et al., 13 Oct 2025, Syed et al., 29 Dec 2025).
• Remaining performance, interpretability, and trust limitations in socially-grounded and fully autonomous agentic settings, especially under real-world ambiguity and adversarial pressure (Chowdhury et al., 18 Dec 2025, Ren et al., 29 Oct 2025).

Planned research directions include richer multi-stage toolchains, agentic reward model co-evolution, adaptive agent scheduling, and strong theoretical guarantees for safety-critical deployment (Ding et al., 4 Dec 2025, Syed et al., 29 Dec 2025, Yao et al., 13 Oct 2025).

---

References:

• "A Survey on Agentic Multimodal LLMs" (Yao et al., 13 Oct 2025)
• "ARM-Thinker: Reinforcing Multimodal Generative Reward Models with Agentic Tool Use and Visual Reasoning" (Ding et al., 4 Dec 2025)
• "DeepEyesV2: Toward Agentic Multimodal Model" (Hong et al., 7 Nov 2025)
• "Skywork-R1V4: Toward Agentic Multimodal Intelligence through Interleaved Thinking with Images and DeepResearch" (Zhang et al., 2 Dec 2025)
• "Octopus: Agentic Multimodal Reasoning with Six-Capability Orchestration" (Guo et al., 19 Nov 2025)
• "Multimodal Reinforcement Learning with Agentic Verifier for AI Agents" (Tan et al., 3 Dec 2025)
• "PathFound: An Agentic Multimodal Model Activating Evidence-seeking Pathological Diagnosis" (Hua et al., 29 Dec 2025)
• "Toward Trustworthy Agentic AI: A Multimodal Framework for Preventing Prompt Injection Attacks" (Syed et al., 29 Dec 2025)
• "AMUSE: Audio-Visual Benchmark and Alignment Framework for Agentic Multi-Speaker Understanding" (Chowdhury et al., 18 Dec 2025)
• "Agentic Moderation: Multi-Agent Design for Safer Vision-LLMs" (Ren et al., 29 Oct 2025)
• "MIRAGE: Agentic Framework for Multimodal Misinformation Detection with Web-Grounded Reasoning" (Shopnil et al., 20 Oct 2025)
• "WeaveMuse: An Open Agentic System for Multimodal Music Understanding and Generation" (Karystinaios, 14 Sep 2025)
• "Seeing and Reasoning with Confidence: Supercharging Multimodal LLMs with an Uncertainty-Aware Agentic Framework" (Zhi et al., 11 Mar 2025)
• "ContextNav: Towards Agentic Multimodal In-Context Learning" (Fu et al., 6 Oct 2025)
• "SurgVisAgent: Multimodal Agentic Model for Versatile Surgical Visual Enhancement" (Lei et al., 3 Jul 2025)
• "FT-ARM: Fine-Tuned Agentic Reflection Multimodal LLM for Pressure Ulcer Severity Classification with Reasoning" (Fard et al., 28 Oct 2025)
• "Agentic Multimodal AI for Hyperpersonalized B2B and B2C Advertising in Competitive Markets" (Srinivas et al., 1 Apr 2025)
• "Multimodal DeepResearcher: Generating Text-Chart Interleaved Reports From Scratch with Agentic Framework" (Yang et al., 3 Jun 2025)
• "Towards Agentic AI for Multimodal-Guided Video Object Segmentation" (Tran et al., 14 Aug 2025)