Result 197, Algebra

A torsion-free group algebra that is not directly finite

Constructs a finitely presented torsion-free nonsofic group whose group algebra over đ”œ2 is not directly finite, disproving Kaplansky's conjecture even without torsion. Companion examples give injective nonsurjective cellular automata on all configurations, refuting Gottschalk's surjunctivity conjecture. Another counterexample is an integral group-ring matrix, invertible over the rational group ring, with Fuglede–Kadison determinant strictly between zero and one, disproving the unrestricted Determinant Conjecture.

Lean formalization Reasoning summary (PDF) Disproof or counterexample

The bigger picture

Why it matters

Multiplication can have a one-way undo operation even in an algebra built from a group with no nonidentity element of finite order. The manuscript reports a counterexample to a general expectation about reversing multiplication.

What changes?

The manuscript constructs a finitely presented, torsion-free group whose group algebra over the two-element field fails direct finiteness. This algebra consists of finite formal sums of group elements, with coefficients zero or one. Failure means two such sums multiply to one in one order but not the reverse. The group is reported to be nonsofic and to admit a finite two-dimensional classifying complex, a topological space encoding the group.

What does that help mathematicians do?

The claimed example rules out torsion as a necessary cause of this failure: banning nontrivial finite-order group elements is not enough. A finite presentation and a finite two-dimensional classifying complex are not enough either. Researchers seeking conditions that force one-sided inverses to be two-sided would therefore need stronger assumptions. The stated torsion-free counterexample concerns the two-element field; it does not establish failure over every field.

Are there practical applications?

The immediate value is foundational, including a connection to cellular automata. A companion characteristic-two manuscript reports a local update rule on all configurations indexed by group elements that is injective but not surjective: distinct configurations remain distinct, yet some have no predecessor. This challenges Gottschalk's surjunctivity conjecture and exposes a limit on reversibility, rather than demonstrating a practical technology.

This section was generated by GPT-6 Astra Medium. This explanation is based on the result summary and manuscript abstracts below. This context is separate from OpenAI's source text.

4 manuscripts

A Torsion-Free Group Algebra That Is Not Directly Finite

October 4, 2026 31 pages

We construct a finitely presented torsion-free counterexample to Kaplansky's direct finiteness conjecture over the field of two elements. The group admits a finite two-dimensional classifying complex.

Cite (BibTeX)
@misc{OAI:A-Torsion-Free-Group-Algebra-That-Is-Not-Directly-Finite-October-4-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{A Torsion-Free Group Algebra That Is Not Directly Finite}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/A-Torsion-Free-Group-Algebra-That-Is-Not-Directly-Finite-October-4-2026/direct-finiteness.pdf}{OAI:A-Torsion-Free-Group-Algebra-That-Is-Not-Directly-Finite-October-4-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

A Counterexample to Kaplansky's Direct-Finiteness Conjecture in Characteristic Two

September 23, 2026 28 pages Main result formalized in Lean

We disprove Kaplansky's direct-finiteness conjecture by constructing a finite field K of characteristic two, a finitely presented group G, and finite sums a,b∈K[G]a,b\in K[G] with ab=1ab=1 but ba≠1ba\ne1. The group G is nonsofic. The same elements define a cellular automaton on KG that is injective but not surjective, disproving Gottschalk's surjunctivity conjecture.

Cite (BibTeX)
@misc{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-Kaplanskys-Direct-Finiteness-Conjecture-in-Characteristic-Two-September-23-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{A Counterexample to Kaplansky's Direct-Finiteness Conjecture in Characteristic Two}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/A-Counterexample-to-Kaplanskys-Direct-Finiteness-Conjecture-in-Characteristic-Two-September-23-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-Kaplanskys-Direct-Finiteness-Conjecture-in-Characteristic-Two-September-23-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

A Counterexample to the Group-Ring Determinant Conjecture

September 23, 2026 9 pages Main result formalized in Lean

We disprove the unrestricted group-ring Determinant Conjecture. We construct a finitely generated group G and a square matrix over Z[G]\mathbb Z[G] that is invertible over Q[G]\mathbb Q[G] and has Fuglede–Kadison determinant strictly between zero and one. The logarithmic integral defining the determinant is finite.

Cite (BibTeX)
@misc{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-the-Group-Ring-Determinant-Conjecture-September-23-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{A Counterexample to the Group-Ring Determinant Conjecture}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/A-Counterexample-to-the-Group-Ring-Determinant-Conjecture-September-23-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-the-Group-Ring-Determinant-Conjecture-September-23-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

A Counterexample to Kaplansky's Direct-Finiteness Conjecture in Odd Characteristic

September 26, 2026 25 pages Main result formalized in Lean

We construct a counterexample to Kaplansky's direct-finiteness conjecture in odd characteristic. For one specified odd prime p, we obtain a field K of order p4, a finitely generated group G containing torsion, and finite sums a,b∈K[G]a,b\in K[G] with ab=1ab=1 but ba≠1ba\ne1. The same elements define a cellular automaton on KG that is injective but not surjective.

Cite (BibTeX)
@misc{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-Kaplanskys-Direct-Finiteness-Conjecture-in-Odd-Characteristic-September-26-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{A Counterexample to Kaplansky's Direct-Finiteness Conjecture in Odd Characteristic}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/A-Counterexample-to-Kaplanskys-Direct-Finiteness-Conjecture-in-Odd-Characteristic-September-26-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:A-Counterexample-to-Kaplanskys-Direct-Finiteness-Conjecture-in-Odd-Characteristic-September-26-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

Lean formalization

OpenAI's note on what the formalization covers, from lean/docs/197.md.

A torsion-free group algebra that is not directly finite

The following describes the scope of the Lean formalization related to the following accompanying paper(s):

Scope

Kaplansky's direct-finiteness conjecture asserts that ab=1ab=1 implies ba=1ba=1 for a,b∈K[G]a,b\in K[G], for every field KK and group GG. The formalized results construct a finite field of characteristic two and a group algebra violating this implication. One statement records the counterexample for a finitely generated group; the more detailed construction gives a finitely presented group with an element of odd prime order.

The detailed construction also gives a precise recipe for choosing the data and proves that the required search terminates. The further conclusion that the group is nonsofic is outside these statements.

A nonsingular integer matrix has absolute determinant at least 11. The group-ring Determinant Conjecture extends this bound to matrices over Z[G]\mathbb Z[G] for every discrete group GG. If TAT_A is the operator induced by such a matrix AA on finite direct sums of ℓ2(G)\ell^2(G), and ÎŒA\mu_A is the spectral measure of TA∗TAT_A^*T_A with respect to the group trace, the conjecture asserts

∫(0,∞)log⁥t dÎŒA(t)≄0,\displaystyle \int_{(0,\infty)}\log t\,d\mu_A(t)\ge0,

with the zero spectral atom omitted. For an invertible square matrix, this is equivalent to its Fuglede–Kadison determinant being at least 11.

The formalized result contradicts that bound. It gives a finitely generated group GG and an n×nn\times n matrix over Z[G]\mathbb Z[G], with n≄1n\ge1, that is invertible over Q[G]\mathbb Q[G]. Its bounded left-regular operator is invertible and has determinant strictly between 00 and 11.

The formalization uses the trace of log⁡(T∗T)\log(T^*T) to define the determinant for the invertible operator TT. The paper's additional spectral-measure integral conclusion is not included.

Kaplansky's direct-finiteness conjecture asserts that ab=1ab=1 implies ba=1ba=1 in every group algebra over a field. Let pp be the smallest prime divisor of ((1200600)!)2+1\bigl(\binom{1200}{600}!\bigr)^2+1; this prime is odd. The formalized result constructs a field KK of order p4p^4, a finitely generated group GG with torsion, and elements a,ba,b violating this implication. The associated cellular automaton on all configurations KGK^G is injective but not surjective.

The formalization also contains fixed-field transfer results, separate from the statement linked below.

Comparator links

Result Comparator statement
Finitely presented characteristic-two counterexample KaplanskyFinitelyPresented.lean
Characteristic-two direct-finiteness counterexample KaplanskyDirectFiniteness.lean
Group-ring determinant counterexample GroupRingDeterminant.lean
Prescribed odd-characteristic counterexample OddKaplansky.lean

Data from github.com/openai/math at commit adc7f12, committed October 6, 2026 at 21:58 UTC, last checked for changes about 8 hours ago. Titles, subjects, summaries, abstracts and Lean notes are OpenAI's; page counts are read from the PDFs. The map, related results, search, kinds of results and the named-problem index are Emergent Mind's, built with text embeddings and an LLM, and may contain errors.

An Emergent Mind Labs project. Emergent Mind is not affiliated with OpenAI. None of these results has been peer reviewed. Cite the manuscripts themselves, using the BibTeX on each result's page.