Result 140, Theoretical computer science

Memory–sample lower bounds for noiseless Gaussian regression

For fixed A > 0, a one-pass learner with Ad2Ad^2 persistent bits needs ΩA(dlog⁡(1/ϵ))\Omega_A(d\log(1/\epsilon)) noiseless Gaussian samples to recover a unit vector to angular error 0<ϵ≤1/100\lt \epsilon\le1/10 with probability 2/3, uniformly in accuracy for large d. Computation and randomized updates are unrestricted, but output uses only the terminal state, stopping index and fresh randomness.

Lean formalization New or sharp bound

The bigger picture

Why it matters

Perfect measurements do not eliminate the cost of limited memory. The unreviewed manuscript claims that learning a high-dimensional direction from Gaussian random weighted sums requires more samples as the desired precision increases, even with unlimited computation.

What changes?

For every fixed positive A and sufficiently large dimension d, a one-pass learner retaining at most A times d squared bits between samples needs at least a constant times d times log(1/epsilon) samples. The constant may depend on A; the bound holds uniformly for all positive epsilon at most 1/10. The target is a uniformly random unit vector, a direction of length one. Success means estimating it within angle epsilon with probability at least 2/3.

What does that help mathematicians do?

The claimed bound identifies a precision cost caused by limited storage, rather than noise or computational difficulty. Halving the allowed angular error adds an amount proportional to d to the sample lower bound. Computation and randomized updates are unrestricted, but output must use only the final memory state, stopping index and fresh randomness. For memory growing slower than d squared, the reported lower-bound constant is absolute.

Are there practical applications?

Its immediate value is foundational for streaming inference, where measurements arrive sequentially and only a limited record survives. It gives researchers a benchmark for assessing memory and precision tradeoffs under exact Gaussian data. This is a limitation result, not a faster learning method or a demonstrated performance guarantee for real-world regression.

This section was generated by GPT-6 Astra Medium. This explanation is based on the result summary and manuscript abstracts below. This context is separate from OpenAI's source text.

6 manuscripts

Memory and precision in noiseless Gaussian regression

September 27, 2026 42 pages Main result formalized in Lean

For every fixed A > 0, a learner that retains at most Ad2Ad^2 bits between fresh exact Gaussian linear measurements needs ΩA(dlog⁡(1/ϵ))\Omega_A(d\log(1/\epsilon)) measurements to estimate a uniformly random unit vector to angular error at most ϵ, for any 0<ϵ≤1/100\lt \epsilon\le 1/10, with probability at least 2/3. The constant is absolute for o(d2)o(d^2) memory.

Cite (BibTeX)
@misc{OAI:Memory-and-precision-in-noiseless-Gaussian-regression-September-27-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{Memory and precision in noiseless Gaussian regression}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/Memory-and-precision-in-noiseless-Gaussian-regression-September-27-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:Memory-and-precision-in-noiseless-Gaussian-regression-September-27-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

Posterior replicas and conditional information in Gaussian regression

September 27, 2026 60 pages Main result formalized in Lean

For a signal with density bounded by L relative to uniform probability on Sd−1S^{d-1}, we bound the information in a finite message W formed from exact Gaussian measurements, conditional on an independent projection revealed only to the analyst. For explicit row counts proportional to d, the bound is O(H(W)/d+d+log⁡(2+log⁡L))O(H(W)/d+d+\log(2+\log L)). Consequently, a finite-state learner with o(d2)o(d^2) persistent bits and a deterministic sample horizon needs Ω(dlog⁡(1/ϵ))\Omega(d\log(1/\epsilon)) fresh noiseless Gaussian measurements for constant-probability angular accuracy 0<ϵ≤1/100\lt \epsilon\le1/10 under the uniform spherical prior.

Cite (BibTeX)
@misc{OAI:Posterior-replicas-and-conditional-information-in-Gaussian-regression-September-27-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{Posterior replicas and conditional information in Gaussian regression}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/Posterior-replicas-and-conditional-information-in-Gaussian-regression-September-27-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:Posterior-replicas-and-conditional-information-in-Gaussian-regression-September-27-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

Localization costs and information growth for exact Gaussian observations

September 27, 2026 93 pages

For the image of a uniform cube under a spherical coordinate map, we prove that finite messages from t blocks of Θ(d)\Theta(d) exact Gaussian measurements reveal only OA(dt)O_A(dt) information when each message has at most exp⁡(Ad2)\exp(Ad^2) values, for fixed A. The same bound holds when each message is supplemented with a nested cell that restores the required geometric spread.

Cite (BibTeX)
@misc{OAI:Localization-costs-and-information-growth-for-exact-Gaussian-observations-September-27-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{Localization costs and information growth for exact Gaussian observations}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/Localization-costs-and-information-growth-for-exact-Gaussian-observations-September-27-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:Localization-costs-and-information-growth-for-exact-Gaussian-observations-September-27-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

Projection moments, positive cap domination, and Riesz estimates on the sphere

September 27, 2026 29 pages Main result formalized in Lean

We prove moment estimates for exact random projections of finite measures whose mass is controlled on Euclidean balls, and derive positive domination by countable sums of spherical cap measures. For learners with M=o(d2)M=o(d^2) bits of memory, these estimates give three proofs that uniform-sphere average success at least 2/3 at angular accuracy 0<ϵ≤1/100\lt \epsilon\le1/10 requires Ω(dlog⁡(1/ϵ))\Omega(d\log(1/\epsilon)) noiseless Gaussian observations. The three proofs keep their different stopping and accuracy costs explicit.

Cite (BibTeX)
@misc{OAI:Projection-moments-positive-cap-domination-and-Riesz-estimates-on-the-sphere-September-27-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{Projection moments, positive cap domination, and Riesz estimates on the sphere}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/Projection-moments-positive-cap-domination-and-Riesz-estimates-on-the-sphere-September-27-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:Projection-moments-positive-cap-domination-and-Riesz-estimates-on-the-sphere-September-27-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

Replacing Gaussian observations in memory-constrained inference

September 27, 2026 52 pages Main result formalized in Lean

Replacing the Gaussian rows used to select a finite message by independent rows increases the remaining conditional information by at most CdCd, for a uniform spherical signal, message entropy at most d2, and the specified row dimensions proportional to d. As an application, we prove that learners with M=o(d2)M=o(d^2) persistent bits need T=Ω(dlog⁡(1/ϵ))T=\Omega(d\log(1/\epsilon)) exact observations to attain uniform-sphere angular success at least 3/5, for 0<ϵ≤1/100\lt \epsilon\le1/10 and a deterministic finite horizon.

Cite (BibTeX)
@misc{OAI:Replacing-Gaussian-observations-in-memory-constrained-inference-September-27-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{Replacing Gaussian observations in memory-constrained inference}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/Replacing-Gaussian-observations-in-memory-constrained-inference-September-27-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:Replacing-Gaussian-observations-in-memory-constrained-inference-September-27-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

Subsphere methods for memory-sample lower bounds in noiseless Gaussian regression

September 27, 2026 25 pages Main result formalized in Lean

Let a finite-state streaming learner estimate a uniformly random unit vector from independent exact Gaussian linear measurements. We prove that o(d2)o(d^2) bits of persistent memory and angular success probability at least 2/3 require at least 2−16dlog⁡2(1/ϵ)2^{-16}d\log_2(1/\epsilon) samples for all sufficiently large d, uniformly for 0<ϵ≤1/100\lt \epsilon\le1/10. The proof conditions each batch on its observed projection and controls the resulting random residual subsphere.

Cite (BibTeX)
@misc{OAI:Subsphere-methods-for-memory-sample-lower-bounds-in-noiseless-Gaussian-regression-September-27-2026,
  author = {{OpenAI}},
  title = {{Subsphere methods for memory--sample lower bounds in noiseless Gaussian regression}},
  howpublished = {OpenAI Math Release preprint
                  \href{https://github.com/openai/math/blob/main/preprints/Subsphere-methods-for-memory-sample-lower-bounds-in-noiseless-Gaussian-regression-September-27-2026/paper.pdf}{OAI:Subsphere-methods-for-memory-sample-lower-bounds-in-noiseless-Gaussian-regression-September-27-2026}},
  year = {2026}
}

Lean formalization

OpenAI's note on what the formalization covers, from lean/docs/140.md.

Memory–sample lower bounds for noiseless Gaussian regression

The following describes the scope of the Lean formalization related to the following accompanying paper(s):

Scope

In noiseless Gaussian regression, a learner observes inner products of an unknown unit vector in Rd\mathbb R^d with independent standard Gaussian vectors. The formalization proves that, for every fixed A>0A>0, there is cA>0c_A>0 such that, in sufficiently large dimension, a learner retaining at most Ad2Ad^2 bits between observations needs at least cAdlog⁡(1/ε)c_A d\log(1/\varepsilon) observations to attain angular error at most ε\varepsilon with probability at least 2/32/3 for a uniformly random unit signal, for 0<ε≤1/100<\varepsilon\le1/10.

For memory o(d2)o(d^2), the constant can be universal, and the selected statement also permits success at least 2/32/3 separately for every signal. The linked supporting results include inverse Gram-matrix moments, exact-projection densities, regularization bounds, and sphere- and cube-prior block estimates.

The paper studies how posterior replicas—independent signals drawn conditionally on the same observed data—control information in noiseless Gaussian regression. The formalization establishes the equal-label identity for finite measures, its density and measurable forms, and information bounds for Gaussian, distance, Haar, synthetic, and incidence comparisons. These statements retain exact observation labels, independent side randomness, and randomized transition rules.

For a learner using M(d)=o(d2)M(d)=o(d^2) bits of memory, the resulting bound says that, for sufficiently large dd and 0<ε≤1/100<\varepsilon\le1/10, success probability at least 2/32/3 under the uniform unit-sphere prior requires T≥cdlog⁡(1/ε)T\ge c d\log(1/\varepsilon) observations, where c>0c>0 is universal. The formalized streaming result uses the 2/32/3 threshold; the stronger 3/53/5 variant is outside this scope.

The formalization controls information gained from exact Gaussian observations of a spherical image of the uniform cube. Under the stated entropy and size conditions, repeated localization over tt observation blocks produces nested disclosures with mutual information at most C(n+1)tC(n+1)t and expected final localization level at most CtCt. The selected estimates include inverse-volume control, kernel coercivity, and drift for the actual observation rows.

For a law of finite relative entropy with respect to a uniform cell law in sufficiently large dimension, the regularization procedure terminates almost surely in regular cells. Its expected depth and number of attempts are finite, with at most twice one plus the expected depth in expectation; the remaining relative entropy plus (log⁡2)n/4(\log 2)n/4 times the expected depth is at most the initial relative entropy plus 2/e2/e.

The paper uses projection moments and domination by positive spherical caps to bound the information carried by exact Gaussian observations of an unknown unit vector. The formalization covers integrated frame and sphere moments, cap domination, Riesz-density estimates with fixed offsets, and bounds valid at every radius. It also covers probability bounds for finite-memory learners at a fixed stopping time and after summing over stopping times.

For M(d)=o(d2)M(d)=o(d^2) bits of memory, sufficiently large dd, and 0<ε≤1/100<\varepsilon\le1/10, success probability at least 2/32/3 under the uniform sphere prior requires T≥cdlog⁡(1/ε)T\ge c d\log(1/\varepsilon) observations for a universal c>0c>0. A corresponding bound holds when M≤Ad2M\le A d^2 for each fixed A>0A>0, with the constant allowed to depend on AA. The randomized learner model allows independent shared seeds; its reduction to a finite-state model is proved for dimensions at least three, with the auxiliary dimension-two case outside this scope.

The paper compares fresh Gaussian observations with observations coupled to information already held in memory. The formalization covers mixed-moment and actual-row estimates, critical-radius, one-level, and two-label comparisons, and conditional-information bounds across a block of observations. For sufficiently large dimension dd, the relevant entropy bounds of order d2d^2 bound the information in the fresh experiment by that in the coupled experiment plus a term of order dd; the associated block information increase also has order dd.

It also covers two-point identities on observation fibers and the fiber-block bound, including the boundary case of d−2d-2 observed rows. The uniform unit-sphere prior, Gaussian rows, finite memory states, and randomized transition rules remain part of these statements. The separate streaming consequences and several intermediate comparison constructions are outside this selection.

The paper uses subspheres to bound the number of exact Gaussian observations needed to estimate a unit vector with limited memory. The formalization proves that, for M(d)=o(d2)M(d)=o(d^2) bits of memory, sufficiently large dd, and 0<ε≤1/100<\varepsilon\le1/10, success probability at least 2/32/3 under the uniform sphere prior, or for every unit signal, requires at least 2−16dlog⁡2(1/ε)2^{-16}d\log_2(1/\varepsilon) observations. Under the uniform prior, a lower bound of the same order with a universal positive constant holds at success probability 1/21/2.

The formalization also covers radius-weighted block and terminal estimates, affine and dimension estimates, and a vector-valued beta-mixture comparison with its boundary cases. These statements retain their dimension, width, radius, and suffix hypotheses, as well as the finite-state learner's independent randomness and restrictions on stopping and output.

Comparator links

Result Comparator statement
Projection estimates and memory–precision bounds MemoryPrecision.lean
Subquadratic and fixed-quadratic memory–precision lower bounds NoiselessRegression.lean
Posterior-replica comparisons and sample lower bound PosteriorReplicas.lean
Finite-entropy localization and regularization bounds GaussianFiniteEntropy.lean
Information growth under repeated exact Gaussian observations GaussianInformation.lean
Projection, cap, and Riesz estimates with regression bounds ProjectionMoments.lean
Gaussian replacement and information bounds GaussianReplacement.lean
Subsphere estimates and memory–sample lower bounds SubsphereCurrent.lean

Data from github.com/openai/math at commit adc7f12, committed October 6, 2026 at 21:58 UTC, last checked for changes about 9 hours ago. Titles, subjects, summaries, abstracts and Lean notes are OpenAI's; page counts are read from the PDFs. The map, related results, search, kinds of results and the named-problem index are Emergent Mind's, built with text embeddings and an LLM, and may contain errors.

An Emergent Mind Labs project. Emergent Mind is not affiliated with OpenAI. None of these results has been peer reviewed. Cite the manuscripts themselves, using the BibTeX on each result's page.