- The paper constructs a closed-form, static two-fluid generalization of the Schwarzschild interior solution, with independently conserved incompressible ordinary matter and dark matter in the core and ordinary matter alone in the envelope.
- The model derives a dark-matter-dependent critical compactness from central-pressure divergence, recovering the standard Buchdahl limit of 8/9 when the dark-matter fraction vanishes.
- The results show that increasing the dark-matter fraction reduces the allowable core compactness and that identical global compactness can represent different internal compositions, though stability remains untested.
This paper constructs an analytically tractable, static, spherically symmetric two-fluid extension of the Schwarzschild interior solution (SIS), in which ordinary matter and dark matter (DM), both modeled as independently conserved incompressible perfect fluids, coexist in a central mixed core, while the envelope contains only the ordinary component. The fluids interact exclusively through the shared spacetime geometry, and the construction recovers the standard SIS and its Buchdahl bound in the one-fluid limit (2608.20185).
Model and field equations
The configuration comprises three regions: a core (Region I, 0≤r≤Ri) containing two fluids with constant densities ρo and ρD and pressures po(I) and pD; an envelope (Region II, Ri≤r≤Re) containing only ordinary matter at constant density ρo; and an exterior Schwarzschild vacuum. Each fluid satisfies its own conservation law, ∇ν(Tμν)D,o=0, so there is no direct matter or energy exchange. The DM component is confined by imposing pD(Ri)=0, an abrupt density discontinuity at the interface that the authors explicitly identify as part of the incompressible idealization rather than a microscopic transition.
In the core, the total pressure obeys a TOV-type equation with total density ρT=ρo+ρD, yielding the Schwarzschild-form solution with an effective density ρo0. The individual dark pressure follows from integrating its conservation equation against this total-pressure profile, with the integration constant ρo1 fixed by ρo2. In the envelope, the mass function includes the frozen-in DM contribution ρo3, and the isotropy condition ρo4 reduces the problem to a second-order equation for ρo5, solved in terms of an integral function ρo6 involving a cubic polynomial in the dimensionless radius.
A key structural feature is that the central total pressure ρo7 is not a free parameter: continuity of the ordinary-matter pressure across the interface, ρo8, determines ρo9 in closed form. The remaining integration constants are fixed by continuity of ρD0 and ρD1 at ρD2 and ρD3. The model is thus fully closed by the parameter set ρD4, where ρD5, ρD6, and ρD7 is the ordinary-matter compactness at the core boundary. This closure distinguishes the construction from the related two-fluid Schwarzschild solutions of Zollner and collaborators, where densities and central pressures are taken as inputs and the radii emerge as zeros of the pressure profiles.
Buchdahl-like critical compactness
Divergence of the central pressure occurs when the denominator of ρD8 vanishes. This condition yields an explicit expression for a critical envelope compactness ρD9, and hence for the critical total compactness po(I)0. In the limit po(I)1, po(I)2, the expression reduces exactly to the standard Buchdahl value po(I)3 for the SIS, providing a nontrivial consistency check.
The critical curves in the po(I)4 plane are approximately linear, and the authors supply an analytical interpretation: the reality of the integral po(I)5 requires the cubic po(I)6 to remain positive on po(I)7, and along the critical branch its largest root approaches po(I)8, giving the approximate condition po(I)9, i.e., pD0 to leading order. The approximation improves with increasing pD1 (expansion parameters pD2, pD3, pD4 for pD5), with visible curvature only for the smallest pD6 and largest pD7. The authors are careful to note that this is an interpretation of the numerically determined critical branch, not an independent exact condition, and that the critical curve marks divergence of pD8, not dynamical marginal stability.
Pressure profiles, geometry, and mass–radius relations
Numerically, the dark pressure profile is monotonically decreasing and terminates at zero at the interface, while the total pressure is continuous across pD9 and vanishes at the surface. The temporal metric component Ri≤r≤Re0 remains continuous across the core–envelope boundary, as required by the matching conditions; notably, although DM is spatially confined to the core, its gravitational contribution propagates into the envelope geometry through the matching.
For fixed Ri≤r≤Re1, the mass–radius relation is cubic in Ri≤r≤Re2, Ri≤r≤Re3 in dimensionless variables, with sequences truncated at the critical central-pressure divergence. Two results stand out. First, increasing Ri≤r≤Re4 at fixed Ri≤r≤Re5 lowers the critical Ri≤r≤Re6 at which Ri≤r≤Re7 diverges, shrinking the admissible parameter region. Second, and more structurally significant, the relation Ri≤r≤Re8 implies a degeneracy: configurations with identical global compactness Ri≤r≤Re9 can correspond to distinct internal compositions, i.e., different dark-matter fractions and relative core sizes. This degeneracy is absent in the one-fluid SIS and implies that global compactness alone does not uniquely determine internal structure in two-component stars.
Limitations and open questions
The paper is explicit about its scope. The constant-density (incompressible) assumption implies an infinite speed of sound, and the authors adopt the model purely as an analytical idealization, citing the known delicacy of stability interpretations for the SIS based on perturbative ρo0. The abrupt DM termination at ρo1 is likewise an idealized representation of a centrally concentrated second component. Most importantly, the critical compactness derived here is a Buchdahl-like bound from central-pressure divergence, not a stability boundary: radial stability of two-perfect-fluid systems requires the coupled radial perturbation analysis of Caballero et al., which the authors identify as the natural next step, along with extension to tidal deformability and more realistic equations of state. Whether the qualitative trends identified here—decreasing critical compactness with increasing DM fraction, and the compactness–composition degeneracy—persist in realistic DM-admixed neutron-star models remains an open question that this construction is designed to help answer but does not itself resolve.
Conclusion
The paper delivers a closed-form two-fluid generalization of the Schwarzschild constant-density star with a mixed ordinary–dark matter core and a pure ordinary-matter envelope. Its principal contributions are the analytical determination of the central pressure and metric functions from boundary and matching conditions, an explicit Buchdahl-like critical compactness depending on the DM fraction and relative core size (reducing exactly to ρo2 in the one-fluid limit), and the demonstration of a degeneracy between global compactness and internal composition. Within its stated limitations—idealized incompressible equations of state and the absence of a stability analysis—the model serves as a controlled analytical benchmark against which more realistic DM-admixed neutron-star calculations can be compared.