Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Improved bounds on the oriented diameter of planar triangulations

Published 19 Aug 2026 in math.CO | (2608.19089v1)

Abstract: The oriented diameter of a connected bridgeless graph GG, denoted by diam(G)\overrightarrow{\operatorname{diam}}(G), is the minimum diameter among all strong orientations of GG. We study the oriented diameter of planar triangulations, and show that diam(G)2n+445\overrightarrow{\operatorname{diam}}(G)\leq \frac{2n+44}{5} for any nn-vertex planar triangulation GG. This improves the leading constant in the previous best general upper bound n2\lceil \frac{n}{2}\rceil, due to Ge, Liu, and Wang, from $1/2$ to $2/5$. We also prove that every nn-vertex $4$-connected planar triangulation satisfies diam(G)n+173\overrightarrow{\operatorname{diam}}(G)\leq \frac{n+17}{3}.

Authors (1)

Summary

  • The paper combines a Brooks-theorem-based face-coloring orientation with Menger-path decompositions to prove that every n-vertex planar triangulation has oriented diameter at most (2n+44)/5, improving the previous leading constant from 1/2 to 2/5.
  • For 4-connected planar triangulations, the paper establishes the stronger bound (n+17)/3, confirming the conjectured n/3+O(1) behavior up to an additive constant and demonstrating how connectivity improves directed routing.
  • The results leave the central 3-connected case open, with the main unresolved gap lying between the universal upper bound of approximately 2n/5 and nested-triangle lower bounds of approximately n/3.

Background and problem

The oriented diameter $\ordiam(G)$ of a connected bridgeless graph GG is the minimum diameter over all strong orientations of GG. By Robbins' theorem, strong orientations exist exactly for bridgeless graphs, and the oriented-diameter problem asks how much routing efficiency must be sacrificed when every edge of a bidirectional network is assigned a single direction. Chvátal and Thomassen established the foundational results: deciding whether a graph admits an orientation of diameter two is NP-complete, and every bridgeless graph of diameter dd has oriented diameter at most 2d2+2d2d^2+2d, with matching lower-bound examples up to a constant factor.

For planar triangulations specifically, Mondal, Parthiban, and Rajasingh proved an upper bound of n2+O(n)\frac n2 + O(\sqrt n) and constructed nested-triangle examples showing that some nn-vertex planar triangulations have oriented diameter at least n/3n/3. Ge, Liu, and Wang subsequently improved the general bound to n/2\lceil n/2\rceil for all but seven small exceptions among 2-connected near triangulations; this is sharp for near triangulations because maximal outerplanar graphs attain n/2\lceil n/2\rceil. Wang showed that 5-connected triangulations admit GG0. The paper under discussion narrows the gap between the lower bound GG1 and the general upper bound GG2, proving:

  • Main result: every GG3-vertex planar triangulation satisfies GG4, improving the leading constant from GG5 to GG6.
  • 4-connected case: every GG7-vertex 4-connected planar triangulation satisfies GG8, resolving the natural conjecture GG9 in this setting.

The author formulates the target conjecture explicitly: there exists an absolute constant GG0 such that every GG1-vertex planar triangulation has GG2. The conjecture remains open for connectivity three, and the paper does not claim to resolve it there.

A diameter-sensitive orientation via face coloring

The first tool is a linear relationship between ordinary and oriented diameter, valid for all non-complete triangulations: if GG3 is a planar triangulation, then GG4 admits a strong orientation GG5 with GG6 for all pairs, hence GG7. The proof is short and elegant. The plane dual GG8 is connected and cubic, so Brooks' theorem yields a proper 3-coloring of the faces of GG9. Each edge is oriented so that its lower-colored incident face lies on its left. Faces colored 0 then bound counterclockwise directed triangles and faces colored 2 bound clockwise directed triangles, so every arc lies on a directed triangle. Any undirected shortest path can therefore be converted into a directed walk of at most twice its length by replacing each wrongly directed edge with a length-two detour through the third vertex of a directed triangle.

Combined with Menger's theorem (a dd0-connected dd1-vertex graph has diameter at most dd2), this gives dd3 for dd4-connected triangulations, dd5. For dd6 this is weaker than the Ge–Liu–Wang bound; for dd7 it is asymptotically equal to it; for dd8 it matches Wang's asymptotic bound. The same face-coloring technique also produces a lemma for near triangulations: the interior edges can be oriented so that distances within components of dd9 are at most doubled, and every interior vertex reaches the outer cycle (and is reached from it) within twice its undirected distance to 2d2+2d2d^2+2d0. This lemma is essential for the 4-connected argument.

Triangulations with large diameter

The complementary estimate handles large ordinary diameter: every 2d2+2d2d^2+2d1-vertex planar triangulation satisfies

2d2+2d2d^2+2d2

The proof exploits the fact that a triangulation on at least four vertices is 3-connected. Taking vertices 2d2+2d2d^2+2d3 at distance 2d2+2d2d^2+2d4, Menger's theorem supplies three internally disjoint 2d2+2d2d^2+2d5-paths 2d2+2d2d^2+2d6, each containing at least 2d2+2d2d^2+2d7 vertices when 2d2+2d2d^2+2d8. The exterior region bounded by 2d2+2d2d^2+2d9 forms a near triangulation n2+O(n)\frac n2 + O(\sqrt n)0 with at least n2+O(n)\frac n2 + O(\sqrt n)1 vertices, orientable with diameter at most n2+O(n)\frac n2 + O(\sqrt n)2 via the Ge–Liu–Wang theorem.

The technical core concerns the n2+O(n)\frac n2 + O(\sqrt n)3-bridges attached to n2+O(n)\frac n2 + O(\sqrt n)4: each non-edge bridge has a unique attachment n2+O(n)\frac n2 + O(\sqrt n)5 on n2+O(n)\frac n2 + O(\sqrt n)6 and attachments spanning a short interval of n2+O(n)\frac n2 + O(\sqrt n)7 (of length at most two between extreme attachments). The author carves out subgraphs n2+O(n)\frac n2 + O(\sqrt n)8 from these bridges—each a union of 2-connected near triangulations glued along at most one edge—and orients them using Lemma on special orientations, achieving diameter at most n2+O(n)\frac n2 + O(\sqrt n)9 per piece with controlled distances to the attachment vertex. Gluing these orientations together (reversing pieces where necessary to make shared edges consistent) yields an orientation of a spanning subgraph nn0 with nn1; since every omitted vertex has at least two neighbors in nn2, adding them back costs only 2, giving the stated bound.

Balancing the two estimates—nn3 is maximized when nn4, i.e., nn5—yields the main theorem nn6. The additive constant 44 is inherited directly from the threshold nn7 at which the large-diameter regime activates; reducing this constant would require sharpening either the small-diameter analysis or the bridge-decomposition argument.

The 4-connected case

For 4-connected triangulations, both estimates improve. Four internally disjoint nn8-paths allow the interior region nn9 and exterior region n/3n/30 to be separated so that n/3n/31, and every vertex of n/3n/32 has a neighbor in n/3n/33. This last property lets the author extend an optimal orientation of n/3n/34 to the whole exterior subgraph n/3n/35 at a cost of only 4 in diameter, by closing directed triangles through each new vertex. In the interior, the face-coloring lemma orients n/3n/36, and 4-connectivity guarantees that each component n/3n/37 of n/3n/38 satisfies n/3n/39 for n/2\lceil n/2\rceil0—four disjoint paths from n/2\lceil n/2\rceil1 to distinct boundary vertices force one to be short. Combining these pieces gives

n/2\lceil n/2\rceil2

Balancing against n/2\lceil n/2\rceil3 yields n/2\lceil n/2\rceil4, confirming the n/2\lceil n/2\rceil5 conjecture for 4-connected triangulations with n/2\lceil n/2\rceil6.

A remark extends the method to 5-connected triangulations: five disjoint paths improve the distance bounds inside n/2\lceil n/2\rceil7 to n/2\lceil n/2\rceil8, producing the diameter-sensitive bound n/2\lceil n/2\rceil9 and, after balancing, n/2\lceil n/2\rceil0—about n/2\lceil n/2\rceil1, slightly better than the n/2\lceil n/2\rceil2 general bound and consistent with Wang's earlier result for this connectivity class.

Limitations and open questions

Several caveats bear directly on the strength of the results. First, the general upper bound n/2\lceil n/2\rceil3 still leaves a multiplicative gap against the nested-triangle lower bound of n/2\lceil n/2\rceil4; the conjectured optimal leading constant n/2\lceil n/2\rceil5 is established here only for 4-connected triangulations, and the 3-connected case remains open. Second, the additive constants are not optimized: the value 44 arises from the crude threshold n/2\lceil n/2\rceil6 below which the Ge–Liu–Wang bound alone suffices, and the constant n/2\lceil n/2\rceil7 in the 4-connected result is likewise an artifact of the balancing argument rather than believed tight. Third, the 5-connected improvement appears only as a sketched remark with the details declared identical to the 4-connected proof and omitted, so its stated bound n/2\lceil n/2\rceil8 rests on an abbreviated verification. Finally, the lower-bound side is untouched: no new constructions are given, and whether the nested-triangle family is extremal for higher-connectivity classes is not addressed.

Conclusion

This paper improves the best universal upper bound on the oriented diameter of planar triangulations from n/2\lceil n/2\rceil9 to GG00, and proves the asymptotically correct GG01 bound for the 4-connected class. The contribution is methodological as much as numerical: the combination of a Brooks-theorem-based face-coloring orientation (giving GG02) with a Menger-path decomposition that converts large ordinary diameter into a savings term provides a clean template that already yields further gains at connectivity five. Closing the remaining gap between GG03 and GG04 for 3-connected triangulations is the central open problem left by this work.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.