Long Grounded Thoughts: Distilling Compositional Visual Reasoning Chains at Scale (2511.05705v1)

Abstract: Recent progress in multimodal reasoning has been driven largely by undisclosed datasets and proprietary data synthesis recipes, leaving open questions about how to systematically build large-scale, vision-centric reasoning datasets, particularly for tasks that go beyond visual math. In this work, we introduce a new reasoning data generation framework spanning diverse skills and levels of complexity with over 1M high-quality synthetic vision-centric questions. The dataset also includes preference data and instruction prompts supporting both offline and online RL. Our synthesis framework proceeds in two stages: (1) scale; and (2) complexity. Reasoning traces are then synthesized through a two-stage process that leverages VLMs and reasoning LLMs, producing CoT traces for VLMs that capture the richness and diverse cognitive behaviors found in frontier reasoning models. Remarkably, we show that finetuning Qwen2.5-VL-7B on our data outperforms all open-data baselines across all evaluated vision-centric benchmarks, and even surpasses strong closed-data models such as MiMo-VL-7B-RL on V* Bench, CV-Bench and MMStar-V. Perhaps most surprising, despite being entirely vision-centric, our data transfers positively to text-only reasoning (MMLU-Pro) and audio reasoning (MMAU), demonstrating its effectiveness. Similarly, despite not containing videos or embodied visual data, we observe notable gains when evaluating on a single-evidence embodied QA benchmark (NiEH). Finally, we use our data to analyze the entire VLM post-training pipeline. Our empirical analysis highlights that (i) SFT on high-quality data with non-linear reasoning traces is essential for effective online RL, (ii) staged offline RL matches online RL's performance while reducing compute demands, and (iii) careful SFT on high quality data can substantially improve out-of-domain, cross-modality transfer.

• The paper presents a novel two-stage synthesis framework that scales simple MCQs with visual data and hardens them into multi-hop reasoning challenges.
• It leverages multimodal models like VLMs and reasoning LLMs to simulate cognitive behaviors such as verification, backtracking, and correction.
• Experimental results demonstrate enhanced cross-modality transfer and superior benchmark performance compared to current state-of-the-art models.

Long Grounded Thoughts: Distilling Compositional Visual Reasoning Chains at Scale

Introduction

The paper "Long Grounded Thoughts" introduces a novel framework for synthesizing large-scale vision-centric reasoning datasets with compositional complexity, utilizing multimodal models like VLMs and reasoning LLMs. The proposed approach seeks to generate diverse and complex multiple-choice questions (MCQs) through a robust two-stage synthesis process, focusing on scale and compositional hardening, which aims to push the limits of existing open-source models. The framework's ultimate goal is to enhance the reasoning capabilities of vision-LLMs by distilling cognitive behaviors such as verification, backtracking, and correction.

Figure 1: Overview of the two-stage synthesis framework, progressing from scale to complexity in visual reasoning data generation.

Two-Stage Synthesis Framework

Stage 1: Scaling and Diversity

The initial stage of the synthesis framework focuses on generating extensive sets of MCQs from dense image captions and grounded object metadata. By incorporating bounding boxes and descriptive text, the framework emphasizes diversity and depth in cognitive tasks, such as verification and correction. This stage constructs simpler questions that rely heavily on visual data synthesized from models such as Grounded-Segment-Anything [ren2024grounded].

Testing scalability, the researchers observed that naive scaling saturates quickly in terms of diversity, which was mitigated by incorporating object-level metadata to condition MCQ generation (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Complexity estimation via multiple rollouts.

Stage 2: Complexity Hardening

The second stage employs a composition hardening algorithm, which merges simpler questions into more complex, multi-hop reasoning problems. This approach requires decomposition and higher-order reasoning, further challenging the base VLMs. Here, reasoning traces are synthesized through VLM reasoning expansion, leveraging deeper concepts beyond direct visual descriptions, by employing advanced reasoning models like Qwen2.5-VL-72B and R1-671B (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Reasoning trace showing enhanced self-verification and backtracking capabilities compared to the base model.

Experimental Results and Analysis

Extensive experiments demonstrate superior performance of models fine-tuned with the synthesized data on vision-centric benchmarks such as V*Bench, CV-Bench, and MMStar-V, outperforming state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary models. Notably, the paper highlights that fine-tuning on this rich dataset facilitates cross-modality transfer, improving text-only and audio reasoning capabilities, notably on MMLU-Pro and MMAU benchmarks (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Analysis of data scaling effects on online RL performance.

Practical Implications

The paper emphasizes several practical implications for deploying this framework:

• Scalability: Efficient multi-stage synthesis on extensive data allows for training improvements without proportionally increasing compute demands.
• Robust Cross-Modality Transfer: Enhancements in vision-centric reasoning positively impact other modalities, suggesting a composite reasoning framework's broad applicability.
• Integration with Open Systems: Given that most systems and results focused on open-data baselines, the framework's integration can scale other models to attain state-of-the-art benchmarks.

Conclusion

In conclusion, "Long Grounded Thoughts" presents a comprehensive paper in synthesizing visual reasoning datasets with multifaceted cognitive behaviors, demonstrating both theoretical advancements and practical applicability in enhancing vision-LLMs. Future work could explore leveraging these insights into domains requiring higher complexity and multimodal interaction, further extending the boundaries of AI research in visual reasoning processes.