Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 93 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 205 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 426 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Exploiting Tree Structure for Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMs (2509.18314v1)

Published 22 Sep 2025 in cs.CL

Abstract: Reinforcement learning improves LLM reasoning, yet sparse delayed reward over long sequences makes token-level credit assignment the key bottleneck. We study the verifiable-reward setting, where the final answer is checkable and multiple responses can be drawn per prompt. Reasoning tasks in math and medical QA align with this setup, where only a few decision tokens significantly impact the outcome. PPO offers token-level advantages with a learned value model, but it is complex to train both the actor and critic models simultaneously, and it is not easily generalizable, as the token-level values from the critic model can make training prone to overfitting. GRPO is critic-free and supports verifiable rewards, but spreads a single sequence-level return across tokens and ignores branching. We introduce \textbf{Prefix-to-Tree (P2T)}, a simple procedure that converts a group of responses into a prefix tree and computes \emph{nonparametric} prefix values (V(s)) by aggregating descendant outcomes. Built on P2T, we propose \textbf{TEMPO} (\emph{\textbf{T}ree-\textbf{E}stimated \textbf{M}ean Prefix Value for \textbf{P}olicy \textbf{O}ptimization}), a critic-free algorithm that augments the group-relative outcome signal of GRPO with \emph{branch-gated} temporal-difference corrections derived from the tree. At non-branch tokens, the temporal-difference (TD) term is zero, so TEMPO reduces to GRPO; at branching tokens, it supplies precise token-level credit without a learned value network or extra judges/teachers. On Qwen3-1.7B/4B, TEMPO outperforms PPO and GRPO on in-distribution (MATH, MedQA) and out-of-distribution (GSM-HARD, AMC23, MedMCQA, MMLU-Medical) benchmarks, and reaches higher validation accuracy with roughly the same wall-clock time.

Summary

  • The paper introduces TEMPO, leveraging a Prefix-to-Tree algorithm for precise token-level credit assignment in RL training of LLMs.
  • The methodology integrates branch-specific temporal-difference corrections without a critic model, driving faster convergence and improved accuracy.
  • Experimental evaluations reveal TEMPO's superiority over PPO and GRPO across various datasets, underlining its efficiency and scalability.

Paper Overview

"Exploiting Tree Structure for Credit Assignment in RL Training of LLMs" (2509.18314) introduces a method called TEMPO, designed to improve reinforcement learning (RL) in the context of LLMs. The method addresses the challenge of credit assignment in RL, specifically in situations where rewards are sparse and delayed over long sequences. TEMPO is built on a novel approach called Prefix-to-Tree (P2T), which converts a group of responses into a prefix tree and computes nonparametric prefix values to enable token-level credit assignment without a critic model.

Methodology

Prefix-to-Tree (P2T)

The P2T algorithm is the foundation for TEMPO, transforming a set of responses into a prefix tree structure. Each node in this tree corresponds to a token prefix, with values estimated by averaging the outcomes of all descendant completions. This method provides a mechanism for valuing non-terminal nodes and focuses reward credit on decision points, overcoming limitations of both Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). Figure 1

Figure 1: Overview of prefix tree value estimation in TEMPO. Each node corresponds to a token prefix ss, with V(s)V(s) estimated by averaging over the outcomes of all descendant completions.

TEMPO Algorithm

TEMPO extends GRPO by incorporating branch-specific temporal-difference (TD) corrections. At non-branch tokens, TD errors are zero, reducing the algorithm to GRPO. At branching tokens, TEMPO provides precise token-level credit, leveraging the tree structure without the need for a learned value network or additional judges. This approach maintains computational efficiency while offering more nuanced credit assignment.

Experimental Evaluation

Performance Metrics

TEMPO is evaluated across in-distribution and out-of-distribution datasets, including MATH, MedQA, GSM-HARD, AMC23, MedMCQA, and MMLU-Medical. It outperforms PPO, GRPO, and HEPO, achieving higher validation accuracy and faster convergence. Figure 2

Figure 2: Validation accuracy of MATH and MedQA for Qwen3-1.7B and Qwen3-4B. TEMPO consistently achieves higher accuracy and faster convergence across both domains and model sizes.

Computational Efficiency

TEMPO also demonstrates computational efficiency, achieving peak performance in fewer iterations and less wall-clock time compared to baseline methods. This efficiency is significant when considering practical deployment scenarios where computational resources are constrained. Figure 3

Figure 3: TEMPO converges faster and to higher accuracy than GRPO, surpassing GRPO's peak performance in fewer iterations and less overall time.

Impact of Group Size and Branch Count

The paper examines the influence of group size and branching on performance. Larger group sizes contribute to more reliable baselines, and more branches in the prefix tree lead to faster learning and higher final accuracy. Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4: MATH (branching tokens)

Implications and Future Directions

TEMPO represents a significant step in applying RL to LLM training by effectively addressing credit assignment challenges without the overhead of critic models. Its ability to integrate temporal-difference signals into group-relative optimization provides a scalable method for LLM alignment. The paper suggests that this approach could be expanded to incorporate multi-step verifications and retrieval-augmented reasoning tasks, potentially broadening the applicability of RL in diverse reasoning contexts.

Conclusion

The introduction of TEMPO offers a practical and efficient solution for credit assignment in RL when training LLMs, leveraging tree-structured TD corrections to enhance accuracy and speed. The empirical results support its advantages over existing methods, highlighting its potential for broader application in advanced AI systems where efficiency and precision in learning are paramount.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.