Existence and mechanisms of a reinforcement-learning ‘cross point’ after strong cold starts
Determine whether there exists a cross point at which, after a sufficiently strong supervised fine-tuning cold start, subsequent reinforcement learning yields no additional performance improvement for data-analytic agents, and, if such a point exists, characterize the fundamental mechanisms—such as policy-space saturation, diminishing exploratory signal, or reward-model limitations—that render reinforcement learning ineffective.
References
Setting aside overfitting, the current trend suggests that a cross point may emerge in which a sufficiently strong cold start leaves no room for further improvement via RL. Whether such a point truly exists, and, if it does, what fundamental mechanisms (e.g., saturation of the policy space, diminishing exploratory signal, or intrinsic limitations of the reward model) render further RL ineffective, constitutes an important open question for future work.