Direction of the second-best bundle under inalienable uses

Determine the direction in which the optimal second-best rights bundle changes when some uses of personalized AI memory are lexically prior to monetary compensation rather than tradable at an exposure rate.

Background

The paper models exposure using a transferable-utility scalar parameter and treats inalienable uses as hard constraints. It acknowledges that this is only a containment strategy: a richer model could make certain uses categorically non-compensable, thereby changing the second-best rights bundle derived under monetary trade-offs. The authors explicitly leave unresolved whether such a change would increase or decrease optimal compensation, control, scope, or other rights components.