The Sample Complexity of Quantum Entanglement Allocation

Abstract: How many past requests are needed to decide which qubits should share entanglement? We show that the answer depends on the allocation choices created by the queries: a larger memory can require no more data. The memory stores a classical bit and answers requests through a fixed detector that preserves coherence within each measured sector. For independent commuting $X$- and $Z$-type Pauli queries, we characterize the full attainable prediction-contrast region and construct encodings that preserve the bit at every nonzero vertex. With sharp reports, a $d$-qubit path and groups of at most $k$ qubits have minimax excess error after $m$ requests proportional to $k<sup>{-1}\min{1,\sqrt{d\log(k+1)/m}}$, uniformly for $2\leq k&lt;d$. Connected biclique regions can grow without increasing sample demand when depth, region count and connections per region stay bounded. Preparation noise introduces a separate calibration requirement. We derive an exact tradeoff with extra fresh detector calls and transfer the learning law to structured transaction co-location. Population-risk experiments test the statistical predictions. We also compare encodings on a native 15-qubit device and learned partitions on public purchase baskets. The full chain wins on the device; frequency grouping outperforms basket search in the largest-capacity retail setting.