- The paper resolves the final Yu–Li–Peng conjecture, proving sharp asymptotic spectral bounds for graphs avoiding odd wheels and characterizing all equality cases.
- For W₅, the extremal graph is a balanced complete bipartite graph with a perfect matching added inside each part, while for k≥3 it is the split graph Kₖ∨qK₁.
- The authors combine edge-spectral stability, dense-core reduction, Perron localization, and residual identities to show that forbidden even cycles in vertex neighborhoods force these rigid extremal structures.
The Brualdi–Hoffman–Turán problem for odd wheels
The Brualdi–Hoffman–Turán problem asks for the maximum spectral radius of an m-edge graph subject to a Turán-type subgraph constraint. This paper by Fang, Zhai, and Zhang resolves the last open member of a family of conjectures posed by Yu, Li, and Peng: the fixed-size spectral extremal problem for odd wheels W2k+1=K1∨C2k. The two companion conjectures concerning fan graphs V2k+1 and even wheels W2k+2 had already been settled — the former by Li, Zhao, and Zou via the extremal graph Kk∨qK1, the latter by Li, Liu, and Zhang through their edge-spectral Erdős–Stone–Simonovits theorem for color-critical graphs. The odd-wheel case resisted these techniques because forbidding a single odd wheel is a strictly weaker condition than forbidding a fan or an even wheel: the neighborhood of every vertex must merely be C2k-free, which permits a nonlinear number of edges locally.
The paper establishes two main theorems with exact equality characterizations. For the exceptional wheel W5, there exists m0 such that every W5-free graph G with W2k+1=K1∨C2k0 edges satisfies W2k+1=K1∨C2k1, with equality if and only if W2k+1=K1∨C2k2 is obtained from W2k+1=K1∨C2k3 (W2k+1=K1∨C2k4 even, W2k+1=K1∨C2k5) by embedding a perfect matching inside each part. For each fixed W2k+1=K1∨C2k6, every W2k+1=K1∨C2k7-free graph of sufficiently large size satisfies W2k+1=K1∨C2k8, with equality precisely at the split graph W2k+1=K1∨C2k9 where V2k+10. These bounds are attained by the functions V2k+11 and V2k+12 respectively, confirming Conjecture 2 of Yu–Li–Peng in full.
Sharpness and the structural dichotomy
A notable feature of the result is that the extremal configurations differ qualitatively between V2k+13 and V2k+14. For V2k+15, the balanced bipartite construction V2k+16 plus internal perfect matchings is V2k+17-regular, hence has spectral radius exactly V2k+18; it remains V2k+19-free because the neighborhood of any vertex is a join of its matching partner with a matching in the opposite part, which contains no W2k+20. For W2k+21, the local obstruction strengthens: the longest cycle in W2k+22 for the split extremal graph has length below W2k+23, so W2k+24 is W2k+25-free while attaining the threshold identity W2k+26 directly from the eigen-equations on the clique and independent parts.
The authors also prove a standalone rigidity lemma for the W2k+27 case: any graph whose vertex set partitions into two sets inducing maximum degree at most one satisfies W2k+28, with equality forcing the regular matched complete bipartite structure. The equality analysis proceeds by multiplying paired Perron-coordinate inequalities across the bipartition and tracing saturation conditions to force constant Perron coordinates, hence regularity, then degree counting to force W2k+29 with all cross edges present.
Methodology
Three tools are combined. First, the edge-spectral stability theorem of Li–Liu–Zhang: for fixed Kk∨qK10 with Kk∨qK11, any Kk∨qK12-free graph with Kk∨qK13 large edges and Kk∨qK14 is within Kk∨qK15 edge edits of a complete bipartite graph Kk∨qK16, and moreover Kk∨qK17 for all such graphs. Second, the dense-core method of Fang–Lin–Zhai: iteratively deleting Kk∨qK18-dense proper subgraphs (those increasing the ratio Kk∨qK19 by at least the proportional edge loss) terminates at an C2k0-core retaining C2k1 edges and spectral radius above the target function. A key technical contribution here is Lemma 3's reduction argument, which shows the core's spectral ratio exceeds C2k2 by comparing the accumulated gain C2k3 against the drift of C2k4, controlled via C2k5. Third, the residual function of Zhai–Li–Lou, which converts the eigen-equation at a Perron-maximizing vertex into an identity isolating the surplus C2k6 as a sum of signed local terms.
On top of this common machinery sits a detailed Perron localization analysis. The minimum-edit partition is refined so that C2k7 is shown empty by a contradiction between a lower bound C2k8 and upper bounds derived from the subset estimates C2k9. The analysis then splits into a split regime (W50), where the Perron mass concentrates in the smaller part and vertices of W51 carry coordinates at most a quarter of the maximum, and a balanced regime (W52), where cross-degrees exceed W53 times the opposite part size and internal degrees are bounded by the wheel parameter.
Closing the arguments
In the split regime for both theorems, the set W54 of neighbors of the Perron maximizer with coordinates exceeding W55 is bounded: for W56, inclusion–exclusion over common neighborhoods forces W57; for W58, a W59 would otherwise be embedded in m00, giving m01. The residual identity then shows m02 is forced (smaller values make the surplus negative since m03 eventually), and a further claim shows missing edges within m04 are incompatible with m05 because each non-edge contributes more than the deficit m06 it creates. Equality analysis collapses the structure to m07 with m08.
In the balanced regime, the two cases diverge. For m09, internal maximum degree at most one on each side suffices, and Proposition 3 applies directly. For W50, the argument is quantitative: writing W51, W52, and W53, a Rayleigh-quotient estimate gives W54 where W55. Since W56 from the internal-degree bound, a case analysis over W57 shows W58 unless W59. But then some vertex has internal degree exactly G0, its neighborhood in G1 has a common intersection G2 of size G3, and G4 forces two disjoint edges in G5 — which together with the G6 internal neighbors completes a G7 inside a single neighborhood, producing the forbidden wheel. Thus only the split configuration survives.
Limitations and open questions
The results are asymptotic: both theorems hold only for G8 beyond an unspecified threshold G9, and no effective bound on W2k+1=K1∨C2k00 is given. The equality characterization in Theorem 2 requires W2k+1=K1∨C2k01; when this divisibility fails, equality is unattainable, and the paper leaves open the determination of the exact maximum in each nonzero residue class, noting only that threshold graphs obtained from W2k+1=K1∨C2k02 by bounded defect are natural candidates. The dense-core constants are non-explicit, and the stability theorem invoked is itself qualitative in its edit-distance bound.
Conclusion
The paper settles the remaining Yu–Li–Peng conjecture by demonstrating that the W2k+1=K1∨C2k03 and general odd-wheel problems share a common dense-core/stability skeleton but differ in terminal rigidity: a matching can persist inside each side of a balanced complete bipartite graph without creating a W2k+1=K1∨C2k04 in any neighborhood, whereas the W2k+1=K1∨C2k05 obstruction eliminates all bounded-ratio configurations for W2k+1=K1∨C2k06. The combination of edge-spectral stability, dense-core reduction, and residual-function bookkeeping provides a template likely applicable to other fixed-size spectral problems for degenerate forbidden subgraphs.