Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Searching for Extra Dimensions with Gravitational Waves: Dark-Siren Constraints from GWTC-4

Published 12 Jun 2026 in gr-qc | (2606.14549v1)

Abstract: Higher-dimensional theories of gravity predict that gravitational waves (GWs) can propagate into extra spatial dimensions, leading to modified amplitude damping over cosmological distances. Measurements of GW luminosity distances therefore provide a unique probe of the dimensionality of spacetime. In this work, we constrain higher-dimensional GW propagation using the dark-siren method with the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog 4.0 (GWTC-4). We adopt a phenomenological parameterization motivated by braneworld scenarios, in which deviations from General Relativity are characterized by the spacetime dimension number $D$ and a crossover scale $R_c$ governing the transition between four- and higher-dimensional gravity. We perform a hierarchical Bayesian analysis combining 141 compact binary coalescences from GWTC-4 with line-of-sight galaxy information from the GLADE+ catalog. For a prior $H_0 \in [65,77]\ {\rm km~s{-1}Mpc{-1}}$ and $\log(R_c/{\rm Mpc}) \in [2.7,4.0]$, we obtain $D = 4.38{+1.91}_{-1.01}$ (68\% credible interval). We also find that the inferred posterior distribution of $R_c$ accumulates near the upper prior boundary, indicating that the crossover scale remains poorly constrained by current observations. We further show that the inferred constraint on $D$ depends sensitively on the assumed prior range of $R_c$, which determines the characteristic distance scale at which deviations from General Relativity become significant. Our results provide the first GWTC-4 dark-siren constraints on higher-dimensional GW propagation and demonstrate that current observations remain consistent with four-dimensional General Relativity.

Authors (2)

Summary

  • The paper constrains higher-dimensional gravity by analyzing gravitational-wave amplitude decay using a hierarchical Bayesian dark-siren framework on GWTC-4 data.
  • It identifies strong parameter degeneracies between the effective spacetime dimension (D), crossover scale (R_c), and the Hubble constant (Hâ‚€), highlighting sensitivity to prior limits.
  • The analysis reinforces consistency with General Relativity while emphasizing the need for deeper galaxy catalogs and improved distance measurements to probe extra-dimensional effects.

Gravitational-Wave Constraints on Extra Dimensions from GWTC-4 Dark Siren Analysis

Motivation and Theoretical Framework

The paper "Searching for Extra Dimensions with Gravitational Waves: Dark-Siren Constraints from GWTC-4" (2606.14549) investigates the viability of higher-dimensional gravity theories through their impact on gravitational-wave (GW) propagation, leveraging the latest catalog of compact binary coalescence (CBC) events from the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA GWTC-4 release. The core premise is rooted in models such as the DGP brane-world scenario, which predict scale-dependent amplitude damping for GWs due to propagation into extra spatial dimensions. This phenomenology introduces a dependence of the GW luminosity distance dLGWd_L^{\rm GW} on both the effective spacetime dimension DD and a crossover scale RcR_c delineating the regime transition between four- and higher-dimensional gravity. The GWTC-4 dataset, analyzed within a hierarchical Bayesian dark-siren framework and associated with the GLADE+ galaxy catalog, provides a statistically rigorous setting to test such deviations from General Relativity (GR).

The analysis operationalizes a parameterization of GW amplitude decay:

dLGW=dLEM[1+(dLEMRc(1+z))n]D−42n,d_L^{\rm GW} = d_L^{\rm EM} \left[ 1 + \left(\frac{d_L^{\rm EM}}{R_c(1+z)}\right)^n \right]^{\frac{D-4}{2n}},

where dLEMd_L^{\rm EM} is the standard electromagnetic luminosity distance, nn is a fixed phenomenological index, and D,RcD, R_c are constrained by GW observations. For standard GR (D=4D = 4), dLGW=dLEMd_L^{\rm GW} = d_L^{\rm EM}; deviations towards D>4D > 4 manifest as increased GW amplitude damping for sources at cosmological distances contingent on DD0. Figure 1

Figure 1: The ratio of DD1 versus DD2 for DD3 across different DD4 values, illustrating the onset of extra-dimensional effects.

Methodology: Hierarchical Bayesian Dark Siren Analysis

The study employs a hierarchical Bayesian framework for population-level inference, associating GW-inferred luminosity distances with galaxy redshifts from the GLADE+ catalog. Hyperparameters sampled include DD5 (the Hubble constant), DD6, and DD7, with the matter density fixed to Planck values. The analysis uses 141 CBCs (including both BBH and neutron star events) with posterior samples from standard waveform models and applies two prominent mass-population models: FullPop-4.0 (for unified CBC populations) and MultiPeak (for BBH-specific populations). Redshift distribution priors are constructed from luminosity-weighted galaxy counts and supplemented by uniform-comoving-volume assumptions for catalog incompleteness at high redshift.

Computation is conducted using gwcosmo with GPU acceleration, enabling efficient vectorized inference. Nested sampling with normalizing flows (nessai) is utilized for robust exploration of the parameter space. Both narrow and broad priors on DD8 are considered for systematic evaluation, with the DD9 prior set to probe the domain where higher-dimensional damping effects are accessible to GWTC-4 distances.

Results: Joint Parameter Constraints and Degeneracies

The principal results include posterior constraints on RcR_c0 and RcR_c1, jointly with RcR_c2 and population parameters. Strong degeneracies are found between RcR_c3, RcR_c4, and RcR_c5; the inferred constraints are prior-limited and sensitive to the adopted bounds for RcR_c6. For the narrow RcR_c7 prior (RcR_c8 km sRcR_c9 MpcdLGW=dLEM[1+(dLEMRc(1+z))n]D−42n,d_L^{\rm GW} = d_L^{\rm EM} \left[ 1 + \left(\frac{d_L^{\rm EM}}{R_c(1+z)}\right)^n \right]^{\frac{D-4}{2n}},0, dLGW=dLEM[1+(dLEMRc(1+z))n]D−42n,d_L^{\rm GW} = d_L^{\rm EM} \left[ 1 + \left(\frac{d_L^{\rm EM}}{R_c(1+z)}\right)^n \right]^{\frac{D-4}{2n}},1), the study finds

dLGW=dLEM[1+(dLEMRc(1+z))n]D−42n,d_L^{\rm GW} = d_L^{\rm EM} \left[ 1 + \left(\frac{d_L^{\rm EM}}{R_c(1+z)}\right)^n \right]^{\frac{D-4}{2n}},2

with the posterior on dLGW=dLEM[1+(dLEMRc(1+z))n]D−42n,d_L^{\rm GW} = d_L^{\rm EM} \left[ 1 + \left(\frac{d_L^{\rm EM}}{R_c(1+z)}\right)^n \right]^{\frac{D-4}{2n}},3 accumulating near the upper prior limit, indicating poor constraints on the crossover scale. The analysis also demonstrates that increasing the upper bound for dLGW=dLEM[1+(dLEMRc(1+z))n]D−42n,d_L^{\rm GW} = d_L^{\rm EM} \left[ 1 + \left(\frac{d_L^{\rm EM}}{R_c(1+z)}\right)^n \right]^{\frac{D-4}{2n}},4 substantially weakens constraints on dLGW=dLEM[1+(dLEMRc(1+z))n]D−42n,d_L^{\rm GW} = d_L^{\rm EM} \left[ 1 + \left(\frac{d_L^{\rm EM}}{R_c(1+z)}\right)^n \right]^{\frac{D-4}{2n}},5, since the relevant population is not sufficiently distant for extra-dimensional effects to manifest. Figure 2

Figure 2: Selected contours for joint posterior distribution on dLGW=dLEM[1+(dLEMRc(1+z))n]D−42n,d_L^{\rm GW} = d_L^{\rm EM} \left[ 1 + \left(\frac{d_L^{\rm EM}}{R_c(1+z)}\right)^n \right]^{\frac{D-4}{2n}},6, dLGW=dLEM[1+(dLEMRc(1+z))n]D−42n,d_L^{\rm GW} = d_L^{\rm EM} \left[ 1 + \left(\frac{d_L^{\rm EM}}{R_c(1+z)}\right)^n \right]^{\frac{D-4}{2n}},7, dLGW=dLEM[1+(dLEMRc(1+z))n]D−42n,d_L^{\rm GW} = d_L^{\rm EM} \left[ 1 + \left(\frac{d_L^{\rm EM}}{R_c(1+z)}\right)^n \right]^{\frac{D-4}{2n}},8, and dLGW=dLEM[1+(dLEMRc(1+z))n]D−42n,d_L^{\rm GW} = d_L^{\rm EM} \left[ 1 + \left(\frac{d_L^{\rm EM}}{R_c(1+z)}\right)^n \right]^{\frac{D-4}{2n}},9 (merger rate slope) with a wide dLEMd_L^{\rm EM}0 prior, highlighting parameter degeneracies and boundary effects.

Figure 3

Figure 3: Selected contours for joint posterior distribution on dLEMd_L^{\rm EM}1, dLEMd_L^{\rm EM}2, dLEMd_L^{\rm EM}3, and dLEMd_L^{\rm EM}4 with a narrow dLEMd_L^{\rm EM}5 prior, breaking dLEMd_L^{\rm EM}6--dLEMd_L^{\rm EM}7 degeneracy and improving constraints.

Figure 4

Figure 4: Marginalized posterior distributions for dLEMd_L^{\rm EM}8 under different upper bounds on dLEMd_L^{\rm EM}9, demonstrating sensitivity and prior-limited posteriors.

Comparisons between population models show that inclusion of neutron-star-containing events (FullPop-4.0) yields slightly stronger constraints on nn0 than BBH-only models (MultiPeak), attributable to more precise distance measurements for nearby events. Systematic variations in galaxy catalog weighting (luminosity versus uniform) or complete omission of catalog data have minimal impact on current constraints, reflecting the incompleteness of GLADE+ at the redshifts relevant to most GW events. Figure 5

Figure 5

Figure 5: Comparison of nn1 posteriors for FullPop-4.0 versus MultiPeak models under different nn2 priors; the effect is diminished when nn3 is large.

Figure 6

Figure 6: Posterior distributions on nn4 for systematic variations in galaxy catalog weighting, confirming marginal impact on current constraints.

Implications and Outlook

The findings show that GWTC-4 dark-siren measurements remain consistent with four-dimensional GR, with nn5 well within the nn6 region. The constraints are, however, reliant on the chosen upper bound for the crossover scale; the posterior on nn7 is prior-limited, indicating that the population distances accessible to current GW detectors are insufficient to probe large crossover scales associated with many higher-dimensional gravity models. Population modeling nuances (event types, mass distributions, and selection effects) play an important role in statistical power.

These results consolidate prior dark- and spectral-siren analyses and reinforce the importance of population distances, mass features, and galaxy catalog completeness for cosmological inference using GW observations. The paper explicitly demonstrates that meaningful constraints on extra-dimensional gravity are only obtainable when the crossover scale is not excessively large relative to the typical GW event distance.

Anticipated advances include deeper galaxy catalogs (DES, DESI, LSST, Euclid), next-generation GW observatories (Einstein Telescope, Cosmic Explorer), and improved localization/distance measurement, which will extend the reach of dark-siren cosmology and enable more robust tests of modified gravity. Special event classes, such as golden dark sirens and strongly lensed GWs, promise enhanced constraints by mitigating host galaxy ambiguities and providing additional cosmological leverage.

Conclusion

The GWTC-4 dark-siren analysis places updated constraints on higher-dimensional GW propagation, finding nn8 consistent with GR for crossover scale priors nn9. The analysis reveals strong parameter degeneracies and prior sensitivity, especially regarding D,RcD, R_c0. Current dataset limitations restrict sensitivity to large crossover scales, and improved constraints will require deeper galaxy catalogs and more distant, better-localized GW events. The results demonstrate the current capability and limitations of GW-based probes for extra-dimensional gravity, establishing a baseline for future cosmological tests with expanding GW and galaxy survey datasets.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 6 likes about this paper.