Comparing Bottom-Up and Top-Down Steering Approaches on In-Context Learning Tasks (2411.07213v1)

Abstract: A key objective of interpretability research on LLMs is to develop methods for robustly steering models toward desired behaviors. To this end, two distinct approaches to interpretability -- bottom-up" andtop-down" -- have been presented, but there has been little quantitative comparison between them. We present a case study comparing the effectiveness of representative vector steering methods from each branch: function vectors (FV; arXiv:2310.15213), as a bottom-up method, and in-context vectors (ICV; arXiv:2311.06668) as a top-down method. While both aim to capture compact representations of broad in-context learning tasks, we find they are effective only on specific types of tasks: ICVs outperform FVs in behavioral shifting, whereas FVs excel in tasks requiring more precision. We discuss the implications for future evaluations of steering methods and for further research into top-down and bottom-up steering given these findings.