Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Optimization of array encoding for ultrasound imaging

Published 1 Mar 2024 in physics.med-ph, cs.LG, and math.OC | (2403.00289v2)

Abstract: Objective: The transmit encoding model for synthetic aperture imaging is a robust and flexible framework for understanding the effects of acoustic transmission on ultrasound image reconstruction. Our objective is to use ML to construct scanning sequences, parameterized by time delays and apodization weights, that produce high-quality B-mode images. Approach: We use a custom ML model in PyTorch with simulated RF data from Field II to probe the space of possible encoding sequences for those that minimize a loss function that describes image quality. This approach is made computationally feasible by a novel formulation of the derivative for delay-and-sum beamforming. Main Results: When trained for a specified experimental setting (imaging domain, hardware restrictions, etc.), our ML model produces optimized encoding sequences that, when deployed in the REFoCUS imaging framework, improve a number of standard quality metrics over conventional sequences including resolution, field of view, and contrast. We demonstrate these results experimentally on both wire targets and a tissue-mimicking phantom. Significance: This work demonstrates that the set of commonly used encoding schemes represent only a narrow subset of those available. Additionally, it demonstrates the value for ML tasks in synthetic transmit aperture imaging to consider the beamformer within the model, instead of purely as a post-processing step.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (12)
  1. Chiao R, Thomas L and Silverstein S 1997 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium pp. 1679–1682.
  2. Claerbout J 2014 Geophysical image estimation by example LULU COM.
  3. Cobbold R S C 2007 Foundations of Biomedical Ultrasound Biomedical Engineering Series Oxford University Press.
  4. Dei K, Luchies A and Byram B 2017 in ‘2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)’ pp. 1–4.
  5. Griewank A and Walther A 2008 Evaluating Derivatives second edn Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. https://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/1.9780898717761
  6. Howard A, Park E and Kan W 2018 ‘Imagenet object localization challenge’. https://kaggle.com/competitions/imagenet-object-localization-challenge
  7. Jensen J A 1996 Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 34(Supplement 1, Part 1), pp. 351– 353.
  8. Jeong M K and Kwon S J 2020 Ultrasonography 40, 289 – 300. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:221347862
  9. Kingma D P and Ba J 2017 ‘Adam: A method for stochastic optimization’.
  10. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I and Hinton G E 2017 Commun. ACM 60(6), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386
  11. Spainhour J, Becker S and Bottenus N 2022 in ‘2022 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)’ pp. 1–4.
  12. van Sloun R J G, Cohen R and Eldar Y C 2020 Proceedings of the IEEE 108(1), 11–29.
Citations (2)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.