Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

On Connected Strongly-Proportional Cake-Cutting

Published 23 Dec 2023 in math.CO, cs.GT, and econ.TH | (2312.15326v4)

Abstract: We investigate the problem of fairly dividing a divisible heterogeneous resource, also known as a cake, among a set of agents who may have different entitlements. We characterize the existence of a connected strongly-proportional allocation -- one in which every agent receives a contiguous piece worth strictly more than their proportional share. The characterization is supplemented with an algorithm that determines its existence using O(n * 2n) queries. We devise a simpler characterization for agents with strictly positive valuations and with equal entitlements, and present an algorithm to determine the existence of such an allocation using O(n2) queries. We provide matching lower bounds in the number of queries for both algorithms. When a connected strongly-proportional allocation exists, we show that it can also be computed using a similar number of queries. We also consider the problem of deciding the existence of a connected allocation of a cake in which each agent receives a piece worth a small fixed value more than their proportional share, and the problem of deciding the existence of a connected strongly-proportional allocation of a pie.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. Barbanel, J. (1996a). Game-theoretic algorithms for fair and strongly fair cake division with entitlements. Colloquium Mathematicae, 69(1):59–73.
  2. Barbanel, J. B. (1996b). Super envy-free cake division and independence of measures. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 197(1):54–60.
  3. Cutting a pie is not a piece of cake. The American Mathematical Monthly, 116(6):496–514.
  4. Dividing a graphical cake. In Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 5159–5166.
  5. Proportional pie-cutting. International Journal of Game Theory, 36:353–367.
  6. Chèze, G. (2020). Envy-free cake cutting: A polynomial number of queries with high probability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01982.
  7. Disproportionate division. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 52(5):885–890.
  8. The complexity of cake cutting with unequal shares. ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG), 16(3):1–21.
  9. How to cut a cake fairly. The American Mathematical Monthly, 68(1P1):1–17.
  10. Fair division of graphs and of tangled cakes. Mathematical Programming, pages 1–45.
  11. Cutting a cake for infinitely many guests. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics Volume 29, Issue 1.
  12. Procaccia, A. D. (2016). Cake cutting algorithms. In Brandt, F., Conitzer, V., Endriss, U., Lang, J., and Procaccia, A. D., editors, Handbook of Computational Social Choice, chapter 13, pages 311–329. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Cake-Cutting Algorithms: Be Fair if You Can. Peters/CRC Press.
  14. Fair and square: Cake-cutting in two dimensions. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 70:1–28.
  15. Steinhaus, H. (1948). The problem of fair division. Econometrica, 16:101–104.
  16. Stromquist, W. (2007). A pie that can’t be cut fairly (revised for dsp). In Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik.
  17. Thomson, W. (2007). Children crying at birthday parties. why? Economic Theory, 31(3):501–521.
  18. Webb, W. A. (1999). An algorithm for super envy-free cake division. Journal of mathematical analysis and applications, 239(1):175–179.
  19. Woodall, D. R. (1986). A note on the cake-division problem. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A, 42(2):300–301.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.