Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

An integrative dynamical perspective for graph theory and the study of complex networks

Published 5 Jul 2023 in physics.soc-ph, cond-mat.dis-nn, and physics.data-an | (2307.02449v2)

Abstract: Built upon the shoulders of graph theory, the field of complex networks has become a central tool for studying real systems across various fields of research. Represented as graphs, different systems can be studied using the same analysis methods, which allows for their comparison. Here, we challenge the wide-spread idea that graph theory is a universal analysis tool, uniformly applicable to any kind of network data. Instead, we show that many classical graph metrics (including degree, clustering coefficient and geodesic distance) arise from a common hidden propagation model: the discrete cascade. From this perspective, graph metrics are no longer regarded as combinatorial measures of the graph, but as spatio-temporal properties of the network dynamics unfolded at different temporal scales. Once graph theory is seen as a model-based (and not a purely data-driven) analysis tool, we can freely or intentionally replace the discrete cascade by other canonical propagation models and define new network metrics. This opens the opportunity to design, explicitly and transparently, dedicated analyses for different types of real networks by choosing a propagation model that matches their individual constraints. In this way, we take stand that network topology cannot always be abstracted independently from network dynamics, but shall be jointly studied. Which is key for the interpretability of the analyses. The model-based perspective here proposed serves to integrate into a common context both the classical graph analysis and the more recent network metrics defined in the literature which were, directly or indirectly, inspired by propagation phenomena on networks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (65)
  1. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323:892–895, 2009.
  2. Mathematics of epidemics on networks, volume 46 of Interdisciplinary applied mathematics. Springer, 2017.
  3. M. Kaiser. Brain architecture: a design for natural computation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 365:3033–3045, 2007.
  4. Exploring brain function from anatomical connectivity. Front. Neurosci., 5:83, 2011.
  5. Networks in cognitive science. Trends Cogn. Sci., 17(7):348–360, 2013.
  6. Functional brain networks: great expectations, hard times and the big leap forward. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 369:20130525, 2014.
  7. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature, 407:651–654, 2000.
  8. Analysis of biological networks. Wiley-interscience, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2008.
  9. M. Wickramasinghe and I.Z. Kiss. Spatially organized dynamical states in chemical oscillator networks: Synchronization, dynamical differentiation, and chimera patterns. PLoS ONE, 8(11):1862–1867, 2013.
  10. Robust weak chimeras in oscillator networks with delayed linear and quadratic interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 119:168301, 2017.
  11. Graph structure in the web. Comput Netw, 33:309–320, 2000.
  12. Synchronization in complex networks. Phys. Reps., 469:93–153, 2008.
  13. Dynamical processes on complex networks. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  14. Random walks and diffusion on networks. Phys. Reps., 716(717):1–58, 2017.
  15. Signal propagation in complex networks. Phys. Reps., 1017:1–96, 2023.
  16. S.-J. Yang. Exploring complex networks by walking on them. Phys Rev. E, 71:016107, 2005.
  17. Synchronization reveals topological scales in complex networks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:114102, 2006.
  18. M. Rosvall and C. T. Bergstrom. Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 105(4):1118–1123, 2008.
  19. Navigability of complex networks. Nat. Physics, 5:74–80, 2009.
  20. Stability of graph communities across time scales. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 107(29):12755–12760, 2010.
  21. Estimation of directed effective connectivity from fmri functional connectivity hints at asymmetries of cortical connectome. PLoS Comput. Biol., 12(3):e1004762, 2016.
  22. Scale-dependent measure of network centrality from diffusion dynamics. Phys. Rev. Research, 2:033104, 2020.
  23. Detecting the topologies of complex networks with stochastic perturbations. Chaos, 21:043129, 2011.
  24. Successful network inference from time-series data using mutual information rate. Chaos, 26:043102, 2016.
  25. Joint network topology and dynamics recovery from perturbed stationary points. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, 67(17):4582–4596, 2019.
  26. Dynamics impose limits to detectability of network structure. New J. Phys., 22:063037, 2020.
  27. L. Katz. A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika, 18(1):39–43, 1952.
  28. The pagerank citation ranking: Bring order to the web. Technical report, Standford University, 1998.
  29. E. Estrada and N. Hatano. Communicability in complex networks. Phys Rev. E, 77:036111, 2008.
  30. Framework based on communicability and flow to analyze complex network dynamics. Phys. Rev. E, 97:052301, 2018.
  31. Network analysis of whole-brain fmri dynamics: A new framework based on dynamic communicability. NeuroImage, 201:116007, 2019.
  32. Laplacian renormalization group for heterogeneous networks. Nat. Phys., 19:445–450, 2022.
  33. M. Molloy and B. Reed. A critical point for random graphs with given degree sequence. Random Structures and Algorithms, 6(2-3):161–179, 1995.
  34. Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Phys. Rev. E, 64:026118, 1972.
  35. Network ‘small-world-ness’: A quantitative method for determining canonical network equivalence. PLoS ONE, 3:e0002051, 2008.
  36. M. Barthélemy. Morphogenesis of Spatial Networks, chapter Random Geometric Graphs. Lecture Notes in Morphogenesis. Springer, 2018.
  37. F. Váša and B. Mišić. Null models in network neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 23:493–504, 2022.
  38. G. Zamora-López and R. Brasselet. Sizing complex networks. Comms. Phys., 2:144, 2019.
  39. Cortical hubs form a module for multisensory integration on top of the hierarchy of cortical networks. Front. Neuroinform., 4:1, 2010.
  40. N. E. Friedkin. Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. Am. J. Sociol., 96:1478—1504, 1991.
  41. S. P. Bogartti. Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27:55–71, 2005.
  42. A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 91:5033–5037, 1994.
  43. R.F. Galán. On how network architecture determines the dominant patterns of spontaneous neural activity. PLoS ONE, 3(5):e2148, 2008.
  44. Functional complexity emerging from anatomical constraints in the brain: the significance of network modularity and rich-clubs. Sci. Reps., 6:38424, 2016.
  45. K. J. Sharkey. A control analysis on katz centrality. Sci. Reps., 7:17247, 2017.
  46. P. Pons and M. Latapy. Computing communities in large networks using random walks. J. Graph Algorithms, 10:191, 2006.
  47. C. Piccardi. Finding and testing network communities by lumped markov chains. PLoS ONE, 6(11):e27028, 2011.
  48. Encoding dynamics for multiscale community detection: Markov time sweeping for the map equation. Phys Rev. E, 86:026112, 2012.
  49. M. E. J. Newman. A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social Networks, 27:39–54, 2005.
  50. H. Zhou. Network landscape from a brownian particle’s perspective. Phys Rev. E, 67:041908, 2003.
  51. H. Zhou. Distance, dissimilarity index, and network community structure. Phys Rev. E, 67:061901, 2003.
  52. H. Zhou and R. Lipowsky. Network brownian motion: A new method to measure vertex-vertex proximity and to identify communities and subcommunities. In Computational Science-ICCS 2004: 4th International Conference, Kraków, Poland, volume Part III, 4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004.
  53. R. I. Kondor and J. Lafferty. Diffusion kernels on graphs and other discrete structures. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on machine learning, volume 2002, pages 315–322, 2002.
  54. Mapping from structure to dynamics: A unified view of dynamical processes on networks. Phys. Rev. E, 82:026116, 2010.
  55. Node importance for dynamical process on networks: A multiscale characterization. Chaos, 21:016107, 2011.
  56. Seeding the kernels in graphs: toward multi-resolution community analysis. New J. Phys., 11:113003, 2009.
  57. The physics of communicability in complex networks. Phys. Reps., 514:89–119, 2012.
  58. Uncovering the community structure associated with the diffusion dynamics on networks. J. Stat. Mechs., 2010(4):P04024, 2010.
  59. Random walks, markov processes and the multiscale modular organization of complex networks. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci., 1(2):76–90, 2014.
  60. Whole-brain analyses indicate the impairment of posterior integration and thalamo-frontotemporal broadcasting in disorders of consciousness. Human Brain Mapping, 44(11):4352–4371, 2023.
  61. J. Gómez-Garde nes and V. Latora. Entropy rate of diffusion processes on complex networks. Phys Rev. E, 78:065102(R), 2008.
  62. Spatiotemporal signal propagation in complex networks. Nat. Phys., 15:403–412, 2019.
  63. Constructing minimal models for complex system dynamics. Nat. Comms., 6:7186, 2015.
  64. U. Harush and B. Barzel. Dynamic patterns of information flow in complex networks. Nat. Comms., 8:2181, 2017.
  65. Impact of basic network motifs on the collective response to perturbations. Nat. Comms., 13:5301, 2022.
Citations (5)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 4 tweets with 61 likes about this paper.