Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 74 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 55 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 109 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 212 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 464 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Does the radial-tangential macroturbulence model adequately describe the spectral line broadening of solar-type stars? (1703.02233v1)

Published 7 Mar 2017 in astro-ph.SR

Abstract: In incorporating the effect of atmospheric turbulence in the broadening of spectral lines, the so-called radial-tangential macroturbulence (RTM) model has been widely used in the field of solar-type stars, which was devised from an intuitive appearance of granular velocity field of the Sun. Since this model assumes that turbulent motions are restricted to only radial and tangential directions, it has a special broadening function with notably narrow width due to the projection effect, the validity of which has not yet been confirmed in practice. With an aim to check whether this RTM model adequately represents the actual solar photospheric velocity field, we carried out an extensive study on the non-thermal velocity dispersion along the line-of-sight (V_los) by analyzing spectral lines at various points of the solar disk based on locally-averaged as well as high spatial-resolution spectra, and found the following results. First, the center-to-limb run of V_los derived from ground-based low-resolution spectra is simply monotonic with a slightly increasing tendency, which contradicts the specific trend (an appreciable peak at theta~45 deg) predicted from RTM. Second, the V_los values derived from a large number of spectra based on high-resolution space observation revealed to follow a nearly normal distribution, without any sign of peculiar distribution expected for the RTM case. These two observational facts indicate that the actual solar velocity field is not such simply dichotomous as assumed in RTM, but directionally more chaotic. We thus conclude that RTM is not an adequate model at least for solar-type stars, which would significantly overestimate the turbulent velocity dispersion by a factor of ~2. The classical Gaussian macroturbulence model should be more reasonable in this respect.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube