Identify the hardware modality best suited for large-scale, problem-solving quantum computers
Determine which quantum computing hardware modalities—such as superconducting circuits, trapped ions, neutral Rydberg atoms, photonic qubits, or spin qubits—are best suited to scale to large systems that can solve computationally hard problems, taking into account connectivity, gate fidelities, cycle times, error-correction overheads, and architectural constraints.
References
We do not know yet which quantum computing modalities will be best suited for scaling to large systems that solve hard problems.
Whether this milestone will be achieved first via a CV cluster state leveraging GKP encoding, a DV protocol utilizing fusion gates and percolation theory, or an entirely novel hybrid approach, remains an open question.
What remains unclear is how much reliability is gained by moving beyond the lower bound, and how that gain trades off against quantum error correction (QEC) absorption and compiler makespan.
Fault-tolerant quantum computing requires not only reliable logical qubit storage, but also the ability to perform high-fidelity logical operations between error-corrected qubits at scale. While much of the existing literature focuses on optimizing syndrome extraction for a single logical qubit, the co-design of physical architectures that support both robust error correction and efficient logical computation remains an open challenge.
Whether such constructions can be implemented efficiently on neutral-atom hardware, and what architectural advantages 3D would provide in that setting, remain open questions.