Test whether surplus compression results from the same layer shift

Determine whether the surplus compression observed in the additional Qwen3 and Llama-3.2 base/instruction-tuned model pairs arises through the same instruction-tuning-induced shift in the layer used for LM-head decoding that was identified in the mechanistic analyses of Qwen3 models.

Background

Activation patching shows that, in the examined Qwen3 instruction-tuned models, the layer producing the strongest causal rescue is approximately ten layers later than the probe-decoded layer. The paper also reports surplus compression in larger Qwen3 and Llama-3.2 base/instruction-tuned pairs, but those scaling extensions do not include comparable mechanistic analyses.

The unresolved issue is whether the same layer-shift mechanism explains surplus compression across those other model pairs, or whether the observed compression reflects different changes in encoding, readout geometry, or deployment.

References

Whether the surplus compression observed in the other pairs (Results~\S\ref{sec:rq3_instruction}) arises through the same layer shift remains untested.

— Encoded but Not Decoded: Layer-Localized Evidence for a Three-Level Gap in LLM Syntax  (2609.29848 - Lu et al., 24 Sep 2026) in Discussion, paragraph “The deployment gap as a layer shift”