Sequential multiple-break procedures for nonlinear multivariate and panel models

Develop sequential sup-F-type or analogous tests and associated asymptotic theory for detecting and estimating multiple structural breaks in nonlinear multivariate regression models and nonlinear panel data models, extending beyond single-equation nonlinear least squares settings.

Background

Sequential multiple-break procedures based on nonlinear least squares exist for single-equation models, but extensions to nonlinear multivariate and panel data models have not been developed. Establishing such procedures would broaden applicability to a wider class of macroeconomic nonlinear systems.

References

For nonlinear multivariate and panel data models, equivalent procedures are not currently available to the best of our knowledge.

— Testing for multiple change-points in macroeconometrics: an empirical guide and recent developments  (2507.22204 - Boldea et al., 29 Jul 2025) in Section 6, Testing for change-points in nonlinear models (Nonlinear regression models)

Several extensions remain open. First, the present formal theory concerns a single change. Recursive, interval-based, or penalized segmentation provides a natural route to multiple-change analysis, but uniform recovery guarantees for the resulting procedure require separate theoretical development. Second, the vocabulary dimension and retained projection dimensions are treated as fixed. A growing-vocabulary theory would require dimension-dependent concentration, degree-stability conditions, and control of the pilot projection maps. Third, oracle equivalence requires the finite-document representation error to vanish sufficiently quickly relative to the number of time periods. A noise-aware limit theory is needed when finite-document error remains first-order rather than asymptotically negligible. Fourth, the present default WCO targets linear cross-view covariance. Developing and calibrating a richer family of nonlinear concordance operators could extend diagnostic sensitivity while preserving a clear population interpretation. Finally, extending the framework from offline analysis to sequential monitoring, in the spirit of \citet{Xie2013} and \citet{Leung2017}, is an important direction for future work.