Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Reliability of LLMs for Navigating and Summarizing Neuroscience Literature

Determine whether large language models, including BrainGPT and related systems, can be used to reliably navigate and summarize existing scientific knowledge in neuroscience without unacceptable rates of hallucination, enabling their deployment for literature navigation and summarization tasks.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper discusses emerging applications of LLMs such as OntoGPT and BrainGPT for interacting with neuroscientific data and literature, highlighting promising results like BrainGPT’s performance on the BrainBench benchmark.

However, the authors emphasize a key limitation: hallucinations remain a critical concern for deploying LLMs to autonomously summarize and navigate scientific literature. Consequently, BrainGPT is not currently enabled for this functionality, leaving open the question of whether such use can be made reliable.

References

It is important to note, however, that LLMs are subject to hallucinations. For this reason, BrainGPT is not currently enabled to perform this type of task, and this potential use remains a matter of conjecture for the moment.

ODIN: Open Data In Neurophysiology: Advancements, Solutions & Challenges (2407.00976 - Gillon et al., 1 Jul 2024) in Section 4.2: Harnessing Large Language Models (LLMs)