Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Submodularity of mutual information in dynamic scenes

Determine whether mutual information retains submodularity for sequential sensor-location selection in temporally dynamic scenes or time-varying processes, as it does in static scenes, thereby establishing whether greedy (myopic) selection strategies admit near-optimality guarantees in such dynamic settings.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

In static environments, mutual information is known to be submodular for sensor placement, which implies that a greedy, sequential selection of sensing locations achieves performance provably close to optimal. This foundational result underpins many active perception and information-gathering algorithms by providing theoretical guarantees for myopic policies.

However, when the environment or the process of interest evolves over time, the same guarantees are not established. The temporal dynamics may break the submodularity structure or alter the objective in ways that invalidate the classic analysis, leaving open whether similar performance guarantees for greedy policies extend to dynamic scenes.

References

Whether adaptive or non-adaptive, mutual information satisfies submodularity which shows that selecting sequential sensors locations in a greedy fashion has a sensing quality that is provably close to the optimal sensing quality. This property holds for static scenes and has a flavor of the multi-agent sensor problem. It is unclear how this property holds for temporally dynamic scenes or processes of interest.

Active Scout: Multi-Target Tracking Using Neural Radiance Fields in Dense Urban Environments (2406.07431 - Hsu et al., 11 Jun 2024) in Section 2, Related Work