Complete a matched distributed comparison of negative-valence affective directions

Complete a matched distributed comparison between fear/threat and sadness affective directions in the Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct building-damage assessment pipeline to determine whether the observed decision-criterion shift is specific to threat appraisal or generalizes to negative valence.

Background

The study compares a fear/threat direction with a happiness direction and finds a large hazard-decision effect only for fear/threat. Sadness is included in the sparse-neuron analyses, but no tested distributed sadness-steering strength satisfied the source-task non-degeneracy criterion. Consequently, the experiments cannot determine whether the transfer effect is specifically threat-related or could arise from another form of negative-valence affect.

A matched comparison would require a usable, non-degenerate distributed sadness direction and equivalent target-task intervention conditions. This would clarify the specificity of the affective mechanism and test whether the fear/threat result reflects threat appraisal rather than negative valence more generally.

References

Because no sadness distributed strength passed the source usability criterion, the study cannot complete a matched distributed comparison between two negative-valence classes.

— FearCaut-Qwen: Affective Steering in a Vision-Language Model Shifts the Decision Criterion for Hazard Assessment  (2610.11986 - Zhou, 8 Oct 2026) in Sections 4.7 and 5.3, Limitations and future work