Decouple representation, visualisation, and interaction effects
Determine whether the cognitive benefits observed when comparing GraphXplore with a slide-based review setup are caused by the layered three-dimensional graph representation, the immersive stereoscopic head-mounted display, or the natural three-dimensional spatial interaction mechanism.
References
Consequently, it is difficult to definitively isolate whether the observed improvements in usability and reduced cognitive workload are primarily attributable to the representation format (the layered 3D graph itself), the visualisation device (the immersive stereoscopic HMD), or the interaction mechanism (natural 3D spatial manipulation). While these confounding variables could have been avoided by using the same interaction and visualisation devices for both groups (e.g., testing the 3D graph on a standard 2D desktop monitor), doing so would fail to represent how these immersive MBSE tools are actually intended to be used in practice, thereby compromising the ecological validity of the study. Nevertheless, future experimental designs must attempt to systematically decouple these variables to pinpoint the precise source of the cognitive benefits.
For networks comparable to those we studied, we therefore recommend prioritizing 3D layouts in immersive environments. For substantially smaller or sparser networks, where occlusion matters less, simpler 2D layouts may suffice or even be preferable, a trade-off that remains to be verified.