Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Characterizing Idempotency of Lazy Cellular Automata

Characterize the idempotency of a lazy cellular automaton τ: A^G → A^G in terms of its unique active transition p ∈ A^S and writing symbol a ∈ A \ {p(e)}. Provide necessary and sufficient conditions, expressed purely via the pattern p and the symbol a, that determine when τ is idempotent.

Information Square Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Background

The paper studies lazy cellular automata—maps τ: AG → AG that act as the identity except on a unique active transition p ∈ AS, where they write a fixed symbol a ∈ A \ {p(e)}. Earlier work showed that certain forms of p (constant, symmetric, quasi-constant) ensure idempotency, and the present paper provides a general upper bound on order and sufficient idempotency conditions (Corollary 3).

In one dimension with interval neighborhoods, a conjecture suggested a self-overlapping criterion for non-idempotency, but the direct implication fails for some cases, motivating a complete characterization. The authors therefore explicitly pose the problem of characterizing idempotency of lazy cellular automata via p and a.

References

In this section, we propose two open problems related to the study of lazy CAs. Characterize the idempotency of a lazy cellular automaton τ : AG \to AG in terms of its unique active transition p \in AS and writing symbol a \in A \setminus {p(e)}.

On the order of lazy cellular automata (2510.14841 - Alcalá-Arroyo et al., 16 Oct 2025) in Problem, Section 4 (Open problems)