Sufficiency of non-deterministic ε-complete automata for positionality
Ascertain whether the existence of a non-deterministic ε-complete parity automaton recognising an objective W implies that W is positional over all games.
References
We do not know whether the existence of a "non-deterministic" "$\ee$-complete" automaton suffices to prove "positionality".
                — Positional $ω$-regular languages
                
                (2401.15384 - Casares et al., 27 Jan 2024) in Section 3: Positionality of ω-regular objectives; around Proposition on ε-completable automata