Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Spectral Sum of Trees

Updated 22 January 2026
  • Spectral Sum of Trees is defined as the sum of the two largest eigenvalues of a tree’s adjacency matrix, elucidating its key structural properties.
  • Extremal results identify balanced double comets as maximizers and paths or stars as minimizers depending on the vertex count.
  • The analysis extends to spectral moments and functionals, linking closed walks to practical applications in chemistry, physics, and combinatorics.

The spectral sum of trees concerns fundamental questions about the extremal properties of adjacency matrix eigenvalues for trees. Let TT be a tree with nn vertices and adjacency matrix A(T)A(T), with spectrum λ1λ2λn\lambda_1 \geq \lambda_2 \geq \ldots \geq \lambda_n. The spectral sum S(T)S(T) is defined as S(T)=λ1+λ2S(T) = \lambda_1 + \lambda_2. This concept generalizes to spectral moments and other spectral functionals, underpinning several classical problems in algebraic graph theory with applications in chemistry, physics, and combinatorics.

1. Definitions and Core Notation

Given a simple undirected tree TT on nn vertices, the adjacency matrix A(T)A(T) has real eigenvalues λ1,,λn\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_n. The spectral sum is

S(T)=λ1+λ2,S(T) = \lambda_1 + \lambda_2,

where the eigenvalues are ordered nonincreasingly. The kkth spectral moment is

Mk(T)=i=1nλik,M_k(T) = \sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i^k,

coinciding with the trace tr(Ak)\mathrm{tr}(A^k) and, combinatorially, with the number of closed walks of length kk in TT (Andriantiana et al., 2013).

2. Extremal Spectral Sums Among Trees

2.1 Maximum of S(T)S(T)

Kumar, Mohar, Pragada, and Zhan established that for every n5n \geq 5, the maximum S(T)S(T) is achieved uniquely by the balanced double comet

DC(k1,k2,3)\operatorname{DC}(k_1, k_2, 3)

with k1=(n3)/2,k2=(n3)/2k_1 = \lfloor (n-3)/2 \rfloor, k_2 = \lceil (n-3)/2 \rceil, constructed by a path of length 3 and attaching k1k_1 leaves at one end and k2k_2 at the other. The two largest eigenvalues are the positive square roots of the largest two roots of the quartic equation

x4(n1)x2+(k1k2+k1+k2)=0.x^4 - (n-1)x^2 + (k_1 k_2 + k_1 + k_2) = 0.

Closed formulas exist for both even and odd nn, yielding

  • For n=2m+1n = 2m+1: λ1=(n+1)/2\lambda_1 = \sqrt{(n+1)/2}, λ2=(n3)/2\lambda_2 = \sqrt{(n-3)/2}
  • For n=2mn = 2m: λ1=12(n1+5)\lambda_1 = \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(n-1 + \sqrt{5})}, λ2=12(n15)\lambda_2 = \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}(n-1 - \sqrt{5})} (Kumar et al., 15 Jan 2026).

2.2 Minimum of S(T)S(T)

For every n16n \geq 16, the minimum spectral sum among nn-vertex trees is attained uniquely by the path PnP_n, whose spectral sum admits a closed form: λ1=2cos(πn+1),λ2=2cos(2πn+1),S(Pn)=2[cos(πn+1)+cos(2πn+1)].\lambda_1 = 2\cos\left(\frac{\pi}{n+1}\right), \quad \lambda_2 = 2\cos\left(\frac{2\pi}{n+1}\right), \quad S(P_n) = 2[\cos(\frac{\pi}{n+1}) + \cos(\frac{2\pi}{n+1})]. For n15n \leq 15, the star K1,n1K_{1,n-1} achieves the minimum, with S(K1,n1)=n1S(K_{1,n-1}) = \sqrt{n-1} (Kumar et al., 15 Jan 2026).

3. Spectral Sums, Moments, and Majorization

Spectral moments,

Mk(T)=i=1nλik,M_k(T) = \sum_{i=1}^n \lambda_i^k,

encode structural information about closed walks in TT. Given any prescribed degree sequence DD, the “greedy tree” G(D)G(D) is constructed via breadth-first attachment, always placing the largest available degrees closest to the root. The greedy tree is extremal: Mk(T)Mk(G(D))TTD,  k0.M_k(T) \leq M_k(G(D)) \quad \forall T \in \mathcal{T}_D,\;\forall k\geq 0. This is sharpened by majorization: if BDB \preccurlyeq D, then Mk(G(B))Mk(G(D))M_k(G(B)) \leq M_k(G(D)) for all kk. The proof relies on induction over walk structures and “branch-swapping” arguments (Andriantiana et al., 2013).

These results extend to analytic spectral sums Ef(T)=i=1nf(λi)E_f(T) = \sum_{i=1}^n f(\lambda_i) where the even Taylor coefficients aka_k of ff are nonnegative. As corollaries, the greedy tree maximizes invariants such as the Estrada index

EE(T)=i=1neλi=k=0Mk(T)k!EE(T) = \sum_{i=1}^n e^{\lambda_i} = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{M_k(T)}{k!}

and the graph energy λi\sum |\lambda_i|.

4. Convex Combination of Leading Eigenvalues

For α[0,1]\alpha \in [0,1], the functional

Ψ(T,α)=αλ1(T)+(1α)λ2(T)\Psi(T, \alpha) = \alpha\lambda_1(T) + (1-\alpha)\lambda_2(T)

is maximized, over all nn-vertex trees, by a double comet whose parameters interpolate between balanced and unbalanced forms as α\alpha varies. Precisely,

  • For 0α120 \leq \alpha \leq \tfrac{1}{2}, the balanced double comet DC(k,k,3)DC(k,k,3) or variants remain extremal.
  • For 12<α<1\tfrac{1}{2} < \alpha < 1, the extremal double comet moves leaves asymmetrically between branches.
  • For α1\alpha \to 1, the star K1,n1K_{1,n-1} is the unique maximizer.

Asymptotic analysis for large nn gives: Ψn(α)/n1{1/2if α1/2, α2+(1α)2if α1/2.\Psi_n(\alpha) / \sqrt{n-1} \to \begin{cases} \sqrt{1/2} & \text{if}~\alpha \leq 1/2,\ \sqrt{\alpha^2 + (1-\alpha)^2} & \text{if}~\alpha \geq 1/2. \end{cases} (Kumar et al., 15 Jan 2026).

5. Small nn and Explicit Spectra

For lower orders, the extremal trees shift depending on nn:

nn S(K1,n1)S(K_{1,n-1}) S(Pn)S(P_n) Maximizer Minimizer
4 3\sqrt{3} 2[cos(π/5)+cos(2π/5)] ≈ 2.236 P4P_4 K1,3K_{1,3}
5 2.000 2[cos(π/6)+cos(2π/6)] = 2.732 P5P_5 K1,4K_{1,4}
6 ≈ 2.236 λ11.8019,λ21.2469\lambda_1 ≈ 1.8019, \lambda_2 ≈ 1.2469 DC(1,2,3)DC(1,2,3) K1,5K_{1,5}

The double comet structure becomes strictly extremal for n5n \geq 5, and the path is minimal for n16n \geq 16 (Kumar et al., 15 Jan 2026).

6. Applications and Generalizations

Spectral sums and moments quantify closed walks and relate to diverse invariants. In chemistry, these connect to indices such as the Estrada index (protein folding) and graph energy (molecular stability) (Andriantiana et al., 2013). Extremal results for spectral sums identify trees maximizing or minimizing walk-richness or related substructure counts under degree constraints.

For fixed maximum degree Δ\Delta, the Volkmann tree—a maximally balanced Δ\Delta-ary tree—achieves maximal even spectral moments and Estrada index, confirming conjectures of Ilić–Stevanović and Gutman–Furtula–Marković–Glišić (Andriantiana et al., 2013).

These techniques extend beyond trees with a fixed degree sequence to trees with majorized degree sequences, and may be adapted for broader classes, including unicyclic or bipartite graphs and beyond.

7. Proof Techniques and Theoretical Significance

Extremal spectral sums are established via:

  • Inequalities on the sum of squares of leading eigenvalues, combined with the trace bound λ12+λ222(n1)\lambda_1^2 + \lambda_2^2 \leq 2(n-1) for trees.
  • “Kelmans operations” and “rotation” arguments to control and optimize eigenvalue placement in double comets.
  • Majorization, induction on walk structures, and branch-swapping to demonstrate maximality of greedy trees in spectral moments.
  • Analysis of eigenvector structures, especially of λ2\lambda_2, to rule out branching and confirm path minimality.

The unified framework highlights the deep relationship between tree topology, degree sequences, spectral moments, and walk counts, bridging combinatorial, analytic, and algebraic aspects of spectral graph theory (Kumar et al., 15 Jan 2026, Andriantiana et al., 2013).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Spectral Sum of Trees.