Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Signless Laplacian Spectral Turán Problem

Updated 20 January 2026
  • The paper establishes the asymptotic bounds for the signless Laplacian spectral Turán function by linking graph structure with forbidden subgraphs.
  • It employs Rayleigh quotient, vertex deletion, and stability techniques to analyze extremal graphs like balanced complete multipartite graphs and split graphs.
  • The study extends classical results to hypergraphs and simplicial complexes, highlighting open challenges in the bipartite and multidimensional settings.

The Signless Laplacian Spectral Turán Problem seeks, for a given forbidden subgraph FF and integer nn, the explicit determination or sharp asymptotics of

exq(n,F):=max{q(G):V(G)=n, F⊈G},\mathrm{ex}_q(n,F) := \max\{ q(G) : |V(G)| = n,\ F \not\subseteq G \},

where q(G)q(G) is the largest eigenvalue (the Q-index, or signless Laplacian spectral radius) of Q(G)=D(G)+A(G)Q(G) = D(G) + A(G), with D(G)D(G) the degree matrix and A(G)A(G) the adjacency matrix. This problem generalizes classical Turán extremal graph theory into a spectral context and reveals structural and spectral analogues for graph families, cycles, color-critical graphs, and more, with further extensions to hypergraphs and simplicial complexes.

1. Formulation and Basic Definitions

Let GG be a simple nn-vertex graph. The signless Laplacian is defined as

Q(G)=D(G)+A(G),Q(G) = D(G) + A(G),

where nn0 is the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees and nn1 the adjacency matrix. The spectral radius—maximum eigenvalue of nn2—is denoted nn3. For a forbidden subgraph nn4, the signless Laplacian spectral Turán function is

nn5

The central question is to determine asymptotic or exact values for nn6 and identify all extremal graphs attaining this maximum.

2. General Theorems and Chromatic Threshold

The analogue of the Erdős–Stone–Simonovits theorem—i.e., the spectral Turán theorem—has been developed for nn7. For any nn8 with chromatic number nn9,

exq(n,F):=max{q(G):V(G)=n, F⊈G},\mathrm{ex}_q(n,F) := \max\{ q(G) : |V(G)| = n,\ F \not\subseteq G \},0

and the limit

exq(n,F):=max{q(G):V(G)=n, F⊈G},\mathrm{ex}_q(n,F) := \max\{ q(G) : |V(G)| = n,\ F \not\subseteq G \},1

holds. The extremal examples are balanced complete exq(n,F):=max{q(G):V(G)=n, F⊈G},\mathrm{ex}_q(n,F) := \max\{ q(G) : |V(G)| = n,\ F \not\subseteq G \},2-partite graphs exq(n,F):=max{q(G):V(G)=n, F⊈G},\mathrm{ex}_q(n,F) := \max\{ q(G) : |V(G)| = n,\ F \not\subseteq G \},3. This result extends both the classical extremal formula for the number of edges and Nikiforov’s spectral version for the adjacency matrix. Precise asymptotics and an explicit exq(n,F):=max{q(G):V(G)=n, F⊈G},\mathrm{ex}_q(n,F) := \max\{ q(G) : |V(G)| = n,\ F \not\subseteq G \},4-term (but not a named constant) are given for the error, and the case of bipartite exq(n,F):=max{q(G):V(G)=n, F⊈G},\mathrm{ex}_q(n,F) := \max\{ q(G) : |V(G)| = n,\ F \not\subseteq G \},5 (e.g., even cycles) is excluded due to known counterexamples (Zheng et al., 16 Feb 2025).

Class of exq(n,F):=max{q(G):V(G)=n, F⊈G},\mathrm{ex}_q(n,F) := \max\{ q(G) : |V(G)| = n,\ F \not\subseteq G \},6 Asymptotic exq(n,F):=max{q(G):V(G)=n, F⊈G},\mathrm{ex}_q(n,F) := \max\{ q(G) : |V(G)| = n,\ F \not\subseteq G \},7 Extremal Structure
exq(n,F):=max{q(G):V(G)=n, F⊈G},\mathrm{ex}_q(n,F) := \max\{ q(G) : |V(G)| = n,\ F \not\subseteq G \},8 exq(n,F):=max{q(G):V(G)=n, F⊈G},\mathrm{ex}_q(n,F) := \max\{ q(G) : |V(G)| = n,\ F \not\subseteq G \},9 Balanced complete q(G)q(G)0-partite graph
q(G)q(G)1 Not of above form; exceptions for bipartite q(G)q(G)2 Problem open

3. Special Families and Exact Results

Research has provided exact and asymptotic answers for various forbidden subgraphs:

  • Complete graphs and colors: Forbidding q(G)q(G)3 or any color-critical q(G)q(G)4 with q(G)q(G)5, the unique extremal graph maximizing q(G)q(G)6 is q(G)q(G)7, and q(G)q(G)8 (Zheng et al., 10 Apr 2025, Wu et al., 1 Dec 2025).
  • Odd and even cycles: For q(G)q(G)9 or Q(G)=D(G)+A(G)Q(G) = D(G) + A(G)0-free graphs, the extremal graph is Q(G)=D(G)+A(G)Q(G) = D(G) + A(G)1 (a Q(G)=D(G)+A(G)Q(G) = D(G) + A(G)2-clique joined to an independent set). For Q(G)=D(G)+A(G)Q(G) = D(G) + A(G)3, this structure optimizes Q(G)=D(G)+A(G)Q(G) = D(G) + A(G)4 for large Q(G)=D(G)+A(G)Q(G) = D(G) + A(G)5 but does not conform to the Turán-type density formula, highlighting a key deviation for bipartite Q(G)=D(G)+A(G)Q(G) = D(G) + A(G)6 (Chen et al., 2021).
  • Fans and intersecting triangles: For the Q(G)=D(G)+A(G)Q(G) = D(G) + A(G)7-fan (the graph Q(G)=D(G)+A(G)Q(G) = D(G) + A(G)8), the unique extremal is again Q(G)=D(G)+A(G)Q(G) = D(G) + A(G)9 for D(G)D(G)0, with

D(G)D(G)1

(Zhao et al., 2020).

  • Linear forests and theta graphs: For certain linear forests (forests with at most two odd paths) and forbidden theta graphs D(G)D(G)2, the extremal graphs are split graphs D(G)D(G)3, D(G)D(G)4, their slight modifications, or friendship graphs depending on forbidden pattern (Liu et al., 2024, Chen et al., 2020).
  • Trees and the Erdős–Sós context: Forbidding all trees of order D(G)D(G)5 (or D(G)D(G)6), the extremal graph is D(G)D(G)7 (D(G)D(G)8) or its variant D(G)D(G)9, the latter adding an edge within the independent set, generalizing spectral analogues of classical tree extremal theory (Chen et al., 2022).
Forbidden Structure Extremal Graph Exact A(G)A(G)0/Formula
A(G)A(G)1-free, A(G)A(G)2 A(G)A(G)3 A(G)A(G)4
A(G)A(G)5-free or A(G)A(G)6-free A(G)A(G)7 Closed form in A(G)A(G)8
Tree of order A(G)A(G)9 forbidden GG0 GG1
Trees of order GG2 forbidden GG3 Real root of associated cubic
GG4-minor free (large GG5) GG6 Polynomial for GG7

4. Proof Techniques and Methodology

Most proofs employ a combination of:

  • Rayleigh quotient maximization and explicit Perron vector construction/analysis.
  • Vertex deletion and eigenvector minimality (removing the smallest coordinate to perform induction or contradiction).
  • Degree threshold/stability reduction: Forbidding GG8 or imposing a high GG9 forces "almost" nn0-partite or split structure through degree sum/Cauchy interlacing arguments.
  • Structure theorems from extremal combinatorics (e.g., complete bipartite subgraphs must contain all large trees).
  • Equitable partition and quotient matrix reductions for computation of Q-index.
  • Monotonicity and local perturbation arguments: Any deviation from the extremal construction decreases nn1.
  • Spectral stability theorems: If nn2 is near the extremal value, nn3 is close in edit distance to an extremal configuration (Zheng et al., 10 Apr 2025, Chen et al., 2021, Zheng et al., 16 Feb 2025, Zheng et al., 3 Jul 2025).

5. Extensions: Hypergraphs and Simplicial Complexes

Recent advances extend the signless Laplacian spectral Turán problem to:

  • nn4-uniform hypergraphs: Formulated with nn5-order tensors nn6, where spectral extremality is obtained through reduction to “degree-stable” families. For example, for the Fano plane, the extremal nn7-graph is the balanced bipartite nn8-graph nn9, with Q(G)=D(G)+A(G),Q(G) = D(G) + A(G),0 exactly computed (Lu et al., 13 Jan 2026).
  • Simplicial complexes: The signless Laplacian is extended as Q(G)=D(G)+A(G),Q(G) = D(G) + A(G),1 for the Q(G)=D(G)+A(G),Q(G) = D(G) + A(G),2-th up Laplacian on Q(G)=D(G)+A(G),Q(G) = D(G) + A(G),3-faces of a complex Q(G)=D(G)+A(G),Q(G) = D(G) + A(G),4. The extremal spectral radius, for pure Q(G)=D(G)+A(G),Q(G) = D(G) + A(G),5-dimensional, Q(G)=D(G)+A(G),Q(G) = D(G) + A(G),6-hole-free complexes, is attained by the tented complex Q(G)=D(G)+A(G),Q(G) = D(G) + A(G),7, with

Q(G)=D(G)+A(G),Q(G) = D(G) + A(G),8

yielding bounds for both hypergraph and simplicial complex Turán numbers (Fan et al., 30 Jul 2025).

6. Open Problems and Current Directions

Key open questions and conjectures include:

  • Sharp Q(G)=D(G)+A(G),Q(G) = D(G) + A(G),9 asymptotics and stability for exnn00 beyond color-critical, non-bipartite cases.
  • Bipartite forbidden subgraphs (e.g., even cycles nn01, nn02): The classical Turán density formula fails; extremal value and structure remain open except for some cases such as nn03.
  • Higher-dimensional and operator generalizations: For p-Laplacians, other normalized variants, and further combinatorial structures.
  • Comparison and exact coincidence with edge-Turán extremals: Conjectures propose spectral and classical extremals always coincide for nn04 with nn05 for large nn06.
  • Hypergraph and complex stability: Extension of “degree-stable” and spectral removal lemmas.

7. Survey and Synthesis

A synthesis of the known results demonstrates a dichotomy:

  • For color-critical, non-bipartite nn07, the spectral Turán problem behaves identically to its classical extremal analogue, with Turán graphs as unique extremals.
  • For bipartite nn08, linear forests, trees, and theta-graphs, the extremal structures become split graphs, stars, or other special constructions.

Research continues toward:

  • Sharper understanding for bipartite nn09,
  • Extensions to hypergraphs and complexes,
  • Stability and uniqueness of spectral extremals,
  • Identification of signless Laplacian extremals for complex or non-Zykov-symmetric forbidden families.

The field leverages deep interplay between combinatorial extremality, stability methods, and spectral theory, pushing the boundary of extremal and spectral combinatorics (Li et al., 2021, Zheng et al., 16 Feb 2025, Zheng et al., 10 Apr 2025, Fan et al., 30 Jul 2025, Lu et al., 13 Jan 2026).

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Signless Laplacian Spectral Turán Problem.