Sobolev–Lorentz Embedding Theorems
- Sobolev–Lorentz embedding is a refined theorem that characterizes the optimal inclusion of Sobolev spaces into Lorentz and rearrangement-invariant spaces with precise constants.
- It quantitatively describes non-compactness—particularly at critical scaling—using notions like Bernstein numbers and mass concentration near the cone vertex.
- Extensions of these embeddings include weighted settings, vector differential operators, and non-Euclidean geometries, linking Hardy inequalities with spectral theory.
Sobolev-Lorentz embedding refers to the class of optimal and refined embedding theorems for Sobolev spaces where the target space is a Lorentz or allied rearrangement-invariant function space. These theorems provide a quantitative and often sharp characterization of how smoothness quantities (measured by gradients or derivatives in Sobolev–type norms) control function space membership at critical scaling—often specifying norm constants, optimality, non-compactness, and extremal profiles. Considerations of weights, cone domains, group structures, non-Euclidean geometries, and various generalizations (Zygmund, Morrey, Besov, Triebel–Lizorkin) are central.
1. Foundational Definitions and Weighted Setting
Let and be an open convex cone with vertex at the origin. For and , define the homogeneous weight . The associated weighted measure is on .
Weighted Lorentz spaces consist of measurable with finite quasi-norm
where is the nonincreasing rearrangement of w.r.t. . For this recovers the weighted Lebesgue norm.
The corresponding weighted Sobolev-Lorentz space is
equipped with
The “Sobolev critical” exponent is
The optimal embedding theorem states for and ,
with the sharp constant
No smaller constant is possible (Gurka et al., 2023).
2. Quantitative Non-Compactness and Singular Structures
When , the embedding
is continuous but never compact—the property fails especially at critical scaling. Quantitative descriptions use:
- The measure of non-compactness:
for operator .
- Bernstein (strict -) numbers:
where is the unit sphere of .
For the embedding operator ,
i.e., the embedding is maximally non-compact. In contrast to translation-invariant scenarios, the non-compactness arises purely from mass concentration near the cone vertex and cannot be addressed by simple shifts (Gurka et al., 2023, Chuah et al., 7 Feb 2025).
3. Extremal Functions and Hardy-Type Optimality
Functions which saturate the embedding are radially symmetric, nonincreasing rearrangements of Euler–Lagrange extremals for associated Hardy inequalities:
As , , this recovers the profile .
Key properties:
- Homogeneous of degree outside the origin.
- Support shrinks toward the cone vertex in the extremal limit, illustrating localization-driven non-compactness.
- These functions realize equality in the one-dimensional Hardy inequality after using the cone’s Pólya–Szegő principle (Gurka et al., 2023).
4. Extensions: Vector Differential Operators and Other Settings
Lorentz-refined Sobolev inequalities extend to general vector-valued operators satisfying ellipticity and “canceling” conditions. Spector–Van Schaftingen proved for such operators , the embedding
holds if is elliptic and -canceling. For , this recovers Alvino's sharp Sobolev–Lorentz inequality; for , , etc., similar endpoint Lorentz embeddings follow (Spector et al., 2018).
In non-Euclidean and geometric contexts, optimal Sobolev–Lorentz embeddings persist under suitable isoperimetric and Pólya–Szegő hypotheses on Cartan–Hadamard manifolds, with the sharp constant:
(Banerjee et al., 20 Jan 2026). No smaller rearrangement-invariant space than admits a bounded embedding in this regime.
5. Generalizations: Lorentz-Zygmund, Besov, Morrey, and Campanato Spaces
Sobolev–type embeddings extend beyond classical Lorentz targets to generalized Lorentz-Zygmund (GLZ) spaces :
where , .
Optimal r.i. targets for Sobolev-type spaces on a John domain are specified:
- For $1 < p < n/m$, , .
- At critical scaling (), targets may be Zygmund-type or .
Similarly, precise criteria for Hölder, Morrey, and Campanato embeddings are delineated: holds with explicit modulus , which may include logarithmic corrections in the critical regime (Cavaliere et al., 20 Aug 2025).
6. Strict Singularity, Operator Theory, and Spectral Consequences
A mapping is strictly singular if it is not an isomorphism on any infinite-dimensional subspace. In the non-translation-invariant, weighted cone scenario, one can produce infinite orthogonal sequences of extremal functions such that the embedding
is not strictly singular (Gurka et al., 2023). Operator-theoretically, all injective s- and Bernstein numbers attain the maximum —no compactness improvement or finite-rank approximability occurs. Spectrally, this manifests as a nontrivial essential spectrum for the corresponding weighted -Laplacian.
7. Optimality, Failure of Compactness, and Further Directions
All sharp Sobolev–Lorentz embeddings in weighted, unweighted, and generalized function space settings are optimal in their respective rearrangement-invariant scales. Compactness fails precisely at the Lorentz endpoint (, or at critical logarithmic cases). As soon as target spaces are strictly larger, one quantitatively gains strict singularity (Bernstein numbers decay polynomially), and these exponents are sharp (Chuah et al., 7 Feb 2025).
The paradigm generalizes to group settings and fractional embedding—embedding theorems align with capacity/Hardy/perimeter inequalities and symmetrization techniques. This broad and deep theory, built on Lorentz spaces, rearrangement, Hardy and Pólya–Szegő principles, and operator-theoretic methods, remains central to modern analysis in PDE, functional analysis, geometric measure theory, and spectral theory.
Key References:
- Quantitative analysis for optimal weighted Sobolev–Lorentz embeddings (Gurka et al., 2023)
- Non-compactness and strict singularity (Bernstein numbers) for Sobolev–Lorentz embeddings (Chuah et al., 7 Feb 2025)
- Extension to vector differential operators (Spector et al., 2018)
- Sharp embeddings on Cartan–Hadamard manifolds (Banerjee et al., 20 Jan 2026)
- Generalizations to Lorentz-Zygmund and Besov–Morrey–Campanato spaces (Cavaliere et al., 20 Aug 2025)