Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Filtration on the de Rham–Witt Complex

Updated 24 January 2026
  • Filtration on the de Rham–Witt complex is a framework that encodes key arithmetic and geometric data in p-adic and positive characteristic settings.
  • Different filtrations—canonical, p-adic, Nygaard, and logarithmic—offer explicit tools for analyzing ramification, cohomological dualities, and class field theory.
  • The compatibility with Witt complex operators and functorial properties underpins robust applications in higher displays, p-adic Hodge theory, and ramification control.

Filtrations on the de Rham–Witt complex are a central tool for analyzing ramification phenomena, duality, and canonical structures in pp-adic and positive characteristic geometry. These filtrations, ranging from canonical and pp-adic variants to log and Nygaard filtrations, encode subtle arithmetic and geometric data. They are used to define ramification filtrations (in the sense of Kato, Brylinski, Matsuda, and Abbes–Saito), to express cohomological dualities, and to realize structures such as higher displays and strongly divisible lattices. The main types of filtrations on the de Rham-Witt complex—especially those controlling ramification along divisors—play a foundational role in modern pp-adic cohomology and arithmetic geometry.

1. The de Rham–Witt Complex and its Canonical Filtrations

Let XX be a regular scheme over a perfect field kk of characteristic p>0p>0, and WmΩXW_m\Omega_X^\bullet the pp-typical de Rham–Witt complex. This complex arises as a universal Witt complex with operators: Frobenius FF, Verschiebung VV, restriction RR, and the de Rham differential dd; their relations codify the underlying pp-typical structure (Davis, 2017).

Three principal internal filtrations appear for WmΩXW_m\Omega_X^\bullet when A=W(k)A=W(k):

  • Canonical ("Hodge") filtration: FilcanrWnΩAd=ker(Rr:WnΩAdWnrΩAd)\mathrm{Fil}_{\mathrm{can}}^r W_n\Omega^d_A = \ker(R^r: W_n\Omega^d_A \to W_{n-r}\Omega^d_A) or equivalently as a sum of ViV^i and dVid V^i-generated terms with iri\geq r.
  • pp-adic filtration: FilpmWnΩA=pmWnΩA\mathrm{Fil}^m_p W_n\Omega^*_A = p^m W_n\Omega^*_A, a standard pp-adic valuation decreasing filtration.
  • Nygaard filtration: NrWnΩA={xF(x)prWn1ΩA}N^r W_n\Omega^*_A = \{x \mid F(x) \in p^r W_{n-1}\Omega^*_A\}, yielding a decreasing sequence N0N1N^0 \supset N^1 \supset \ldots (Davis, 2017, Gregory et al., 2017).

Each filtration is preserved, up to predictable changes in level, by the Witt complex operators—FF, VV, RR, and dd—which is essential for their arithmetic utility.

2. Logarithmic de Rham–Witt Sheaves and the log-Witt Filtration

In the presence of a divisor with normal crossings DD on a semistable XX, the log-structure induces the logarithmic de Rham–Witt sheaf WnΩX,logrW_n\Omega_{X,\log}^r. Locally on the étale site, this sheaf is generated by "pure" logarithmic forms dlog[x1]ndlog[xr]nd\log[x_1]_n \wedge \cdots \wedge d\log[x_r]_n where [x]n[x]_n is the Teichmüller representative in Wn(OX)W_n(\mathcal{O}_X) (Zhao, 2016).

For D=miDiD = \sum m_i D_i, the "relative" log-Witt sheaf WnΩXmD,logrW_n\Omega^r_{X|mD,\log} is defined as the subsheaf of jWnΩU,logrj_*\bigl.W_n\Omega^r_{U,\log}\bigr. generated by forms whose residues along each DiD_i have pole order at most mim_i. This construction induces a filtration on H1(U,Z/pn)H^1(U,\mathbb{Z}/p^n) by images of cohomology with coefficients in WnΩXmD,log0W_n\Omega^0_{X|mD,\log}: FilmH1(U,Z/pn):=Im(H1(X,WnΩXmD,log0)H1(U,Z/pn)).\mathrm{Fil}^m H^1(U, \mathbb{Z}/p^n) := \operatorname{Im}\Big(H^1(X, W_n\Omega^0_{X|mD,\log}) \to H^1(U, \mathbb{Z}/p^n)\Big). On the abelianized étale fundamental group, a corresponding decreasing filtration arises, measuring wild ramification, and in relative dimension zero recovers the Matsuda–Brylinski–Kato filtration (Zhao, 2016).

3. Filtrations Controlling Ramification: Kato, Brylinski, Matsuda

For XX regular, EXE \subset X a simple normal crossings divisor, and D=niEiD=\sum n_i E_i an effective modulus, the filtered de Rham–Witt complex refines ramification theory (Krishna et al., 17 Jan 2026, Majumder, 1 Jan 2025):

  • Krishna–Majumder filtration: The subcomplex DWmΩU_D W_m\Omega^\bullet_U is generated by Witt vectors with prescribed pole orders along EE, and its components DWmU_D W_m U, DWmΩUq_D W_m\Omega^q_U have explicit local and expansion-theoretic descriptions.
  • For XX the spectrum of a henselian DVR and D=n(π)D=n\cdot(\pi), the filtration on Wm(K)W_m(K) coincides with Brylinski's filtration: nWm(K)={(am1,,a0)aiπn/piA}_n W_m(K) = \{(a_{m-1},\dots,a_0) \mid a_i \cdot \pi^{-\lfloor n/p^i \rfloor} \in A\}.
  • The Kato ramification filtration on étale cohomology groups Hq(K,Qp/Zp(q1))H^q(K,\mathbb{Q}_p/\mathbb{Z}_p(q-1)) admits a cohomological description via the filtered de Rham–Witt complex, and the structure of the filtration aligns with the jump in Swan conductors (Krishna et al., 17 Jan 2026, Majumder, 1 Jan 2025).

The key operational compatibilities with FF, VV, and dd and the functoriality in (X,E,D)(X,E,D) allow for robust ramification-theoretic applications, including generalized higher-dimensional class field theory.

4. Nygaard Filtration, Displays, and Slope Theory

The Nygaard filtration, NrWΩX/RN^r W\Omega^*_{X/R}, is fundamental for encoding Frobenius-divisible structures on crystalline cohomology, leading to "higher displays"—algebro-geometric analogues of strongly divisible lattices in pp-adic Hodge theory (Gregory et al., 2017). Explicitly, NrWnΩiN^r W_n\Omega^i is defined as ker(F:WnΩiWn1Ωi)\ker(F: W_n\Omega^i \to W_{n-1}\Omega^i) for i<ri<r, and as WnΩiW_n\Omega^i otherwise, with graded pieces GrrGr^r. The filtration is strictly compatible with base-change and functorial in XX, and flows naturally into the construction of displays and crystals associated with lifts or PD-thickenings.

This filtration is quasi-isomorphic to filtrations derived from Fontaine–Messing theory and underlies relative and absolute display structures (as in the work of Langer–Zink), thereby structurally governing the slope pieces in pp-adic cohomological theories (Gregory et al., 2017).

5. Duality, Cohomological Descriptions, and Applications

Filtrations on the de Rham–Witt complex provide the foundation for new duality theorems for ramified covers and étale sheaves. For proper semistable XX over a base, Zhao establishes a canonical perfect pairing between Hi(X,WnΩX,logr)H^i(X, W_n\Omega^r_{X,\log}) and Hd+2i(X,WnΩX,logd+1r)H^{d+2-i}(X, W_n\Omega^{d+1-r}_{X,\log}), culminating in a trace isomorphism (Zhao, 2016). Throughout, filtered versions of the two-term complexes WmFXDqW_mF^q_{X|D} mediate between geometric, arithmetic, and cohomological viewpoints, manifesting in class field theory correspondences, ramified dualities, and explicit descriptions of Picard and Brauer group filtrations (Majumder, 1 Jan 2025, Krishna et al., 17 Jan 2026).

Concrete applications include:

  • Lefschetz hyperplane theorems for ramification subgroups and Brauer groups with modulus,
  • Explicit graded descriptions (e.g., for X=Pk1X=\mathbb{P}_k^1, divisor D=nD=n\cdot\infty, the graded pieces relate to xnx^{-n} expansions),
  • Generalizations of the classical results of Serre, Ekedahl, and Milne to the filtered setting.

6. Functoriality, Structural Properties, and Exact Sequences

The compatibility of the various filtrations on the de Rham–Witt complex with the Witt complex operations is essential for the structural theory. Key properties include:

  • Functoriality: The assignments XfilDWmΩXqX \mapsto \mathrm{fil}_D W_m\Omega_X^q are contravariantly functorial for snc-pairs, and smooth pull-back and excision are compatible.
  • Filtered exact sequences: For example, 0V(filDWm1ΩXq)+dV(filDWm1ΩXq1)filDWmΩXqRfilD/pWm1ΩXq00 \to V(\mathrm{fil}_D W_{m-1}\Omega_X^q) + d V (\mathrm{fil}_D W_{m-1}\Omega_X^{q-1}) \to \mathrm{fil}_D W_m\Omega_X^q \xrightarrow{R} \mathrm{fil}_{\lfloor D/p\rfloor} W_{m-1}\Omega_X^q \to 0 (Majumder, 1 Jan 2025).
  • Filtered Cartier isomorphisms and devissage: These provide technical tools for cohomological calculations and triangles connecting different levels of the filtration.

7. Context, Comparison, and Outlook

Filtrations on the de Rham–Witt complex—especially in the logarithmic and Nygaard contexts—unify and extend the ramification-theoretic approaches of Kato, Brylinski, and Matsuda. In relative dimension zero, the constructions recover classical Swan conductors and ramification theory; in higher dimensions, they provide a multi-parameter conductor framework and effective tools for higher-dimensional class field theory (Zhao, 2016, Krishna et al., 17 Jan 2026, Majumder, 1 Jan 2025). Possible generalizations include the incorporation of torsion coefficients prime to pp, the study of mixed characteristic analogues (via syntomic or prismatic theory), and comparison with deeper ramification theories of Abbes, Saito, and Vojta.

Fundamentally, the study of filtrations on the de Rham–Witt complex continues to bridge pp-adic Hodge theory, ramification, and duality, with explicit computational frameworks and broad applications in modern arithmetic geometry.

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Filtration on the de Rham-Witt Complex.