Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Log-Rigid Analytic Classes

Updated 15 December 2025
  • Log-rigid analytic classes are a framework in p-adic Hodge theory that encode cohomological phenomena using rigid-analytic and logarithmic structures.
  • They facilitate explicit computation and comparison isomorphisms in Hyodo–Kato theory and the construction of syntomic cohomology for semistable schemes.
  • These classes extend to group cohomology with applications in computing p-adic regulators, special values of L-functions, and arithmetic duality.

Log-rigid analytic classes constitute a framework within pp-adic Hodge theory and arithmetic geometry for encoding and analyzing cohomological phenomena via rigid-analytic and logarithmic structures. Their chief utility is the explicit computation and comparison of pp-adic cohomology theories such as Hyodo–Kato, syntomic, and crystalline cohomologies, particularly for varieties with semistable (log\log) structure and in settings susceptible to bad reduction. They also manifest in the study of special values of pp-adic LL-functions and arithmetic regulator maps, framing group cohomological and analytic invariants in a rigid-analytic context.

1. Definitions and Foundational Structures

The formalism of log-rigid analytic classes emerges from the theory of log-rigid cohomology for proper strictly semistable log schemes. Given a prime pp, a complete discrete valuation ring VV of mixed characteristic (0,p)(0,p) with residue field kk and fraction field KK, the standard bases in weak formal geometry are

S=Spwf  W[k],W0=Spf  W,V#=Spf  V,S = \mathrm{Spwf}\;W[k],\quad W^0 = \mathrm{Spf}\;W,\quad V^\# = \mathrm{Spf}\;V,

where W=W(k)W = W(k) is the ring of Witt vectors.

For a strictly semistable log scheme Y/k0Y/k^0 with horizontal divisor DD, and any unipotent log-overconvergent isocrystal (E,Φ)F-Isoc(Y/W0)unip(\mathcal{E}, \Phi) \in \mathrm{F\text{-}Isoc}^\dagger(Y/W^0)_{\mathrm{unip}}, the log-rigid cohomology is defined as

RΓlog-rig(Y/W0,E):=RΓrig,MD(Y/(W0),E), Hlog-rigi(Y/W0,E):=Hi(RΓlog-rig(Y/W0,E)),\begin{aligned} \mathrm{R}\Gamma_{\log\text{-}\mathrm{rig}}(Y/W^0,\mathcal{E}) &:= \mathrm{R}\Gamma_{\mathrm{rig},M_D}(Y/(W^0),\mathcal{E}), \ H^i_{\log\text{-}\mathrm{rig}}(Y/W^0,\mathcal{E}) &:= H^i(\mathrm{R}\Gamma_{\log\text{-}\mathrm{rig}}(Y/W^0,\mathcal{E})), \end{aligned}

with the compact-support variant

RΓlog-rig,c(Y/W0,E):=RΓrig,MD,c(Y/(W0),E), Hlog-rig,ci(Y/W0,E):=Hi(RΓlog-rig,c(Y/W0,E)).\begin{aligned} \mathrm{R}\Gamma_{\log\text{-}\mathrm{rig},c}(Y/W^0,\mathcal{E}) &:= \mathrm{R}\Gamma_{\mathrm{rig},M_D,c}(Y/(W^0),\mathcal{E}), \ H^i_{\log\text{-}\mathrm{rig},c}(Y/W^0,\mathcal{E}) &:= H^i(\mathrm{R}\Gamma_{\log\text{-}\mathrm{rig},c}(Y/W^0,\mathcal{E})). \end{aligned}

These groups are computed by Čech-type complexes on dagger spaces associated to semistable charts and universal formal enlargements, with the resulting complexes inheriting Frobenius and monodromy operators and functoriality. The approach allows for explicit cohomological calculations with arithmetic significance (Ertl et al., 2020).

2. Hyodo–Kato Theory and Comparison Isomorphisms

A central role of log-rigid analytic classes is the explicit realization of Hyodo–Kato theory and its comparison isomorphisms. For a proper semistable scheme X/V#X/V^\# with special fiber YY, the rigid Hyodo–Kato cohomology is given by

RΓHK(Y,E):=RΓrig,MD(Y/W0,E),\mathrm{R}\Gamma_{\mathrm{HK}}(Y,\mathcal{E}) := \mathrm{R}\Gamma_{\mathrm{rig},M_D}(Y/W^0,\mathcal{E}),

with HHKi(Y,E)=Hi(RΓHK(Y,E))H^i_{\mathrm{HK}}(Y,\mathcal{E}) = H^i(\mathrm{R}\Gamma_{\mathrm{HK}}(Y,\mathcal{E})).

The Hyodo–Kato comparison isomorphism, constructed canonically on the rigid-analytic site and independent of uniformizer (modulo the choice of a branch of the pp-adic logarithm), asserts an equivalence between Hyodo–Kato and log-rigid compact-support cohomology: ψHK,π:HHK,ci(Y)FK    Hlog-rig,ci(Y/V#).\psi_{\mathrm{HK},\pi}: H^i_{\mathrm{HK},c}(Y) \otimes_F K \xrightarrow{\;\cong\;} H^i_{\log\text{-}\mathrm{rig},c}(Y/V^\#). This isomorphism is Frobenius- and monodromy-equivariant and respects log structures (Ertl et al., 2020, Ertl et al., 2019). Explicit Čech and de Rham complexes realize these theories, enabling concrete calculations and comparisons with log-crystalline cohomology.

3. Poincaré Duality and Cup Product Structures

Log-rigid analytic classes accommodate a canonical Poincaré duality theory for log-rigid cohomology with and without compact support. For dimY=d\dim Y = d, and dual overconvergent isocrystal E=Hom(E,OY)\mathcal{E}^\vee = \underline{\mathrm{Hom}}(\mathcal{E}, \mathcal{O}_Y), the duality is formulated as: RΓlog-rig,c(Y/W0,E)FLRΓlog-rig(Y/W0,E)    RΓlog-rig,c(Y/W0)  Tr  F(d)[2d],\mathrm{R}\Gamma_{\log\text{-}\mathrm{rig},c}(Y/W^0,\mathcal{E}) \otimes^{\mathbb L}_{F} \mathrm{R}\Gamma_{\log\text{-}\mathrm{rig}}(Y/W^0,\mathcal{E}^\vee) \xrightarrow{\;\cup\;} \mathrm{R}\Gamma_{\log\text{-}\mathrm{rig},c}(Y/W^0) \xrightarrow{\;\mathrm{Tr}\;} F(-d)[-2d], where the cup product is induced by the bigraded Čech–de Rham complex and the trace is rigid-analytic, reflecting the geometry of the weak formal model. This duality establishes explicit cohomological pairings, with compatibility for the (φ,N)(\varphi, N)-module structure, and extends analogously to rigid Hyodo–Kato cohomology (Ertl et al., 2020).

4. Role in Syntomic Cohomology and Extension Groups

Log-rigid analytic classes underpin the construction of log-rigid syntomic cohomology for strictly semistable schemes over pp-adic integer rings. The construction involves a diagram of comparison maps among rigid, KK-specialization, and de Rham complexes: RΓrig  α  RΓK  β  RΓdR (ϕ,N)(F)\begin{array}{ccccc} R\Gamma_{\mathrm{rig}} &\xrightarrow{\;\alpha\;}&R\Gamma_K &\xleftarrow{\;\beta\;}&R\Gamma_{\mathrm{dR}} \ (\phi,N) &&&& (F^\bullet) \end{array} with the log-rigid syntomic complex defined as the totalization of a mapping-fiber diagram: Cone[MrigFnMdRMrigMK][1],\operatorname{Cone}[M_{\mathrm{rig}} \oplus F^n M_{\mathrm{dR}} \to M_{\mathrm{rig}} \oplus M_K][-1], yielding cohomology groups

Hsyni(X,n)=Hi(Tot[]).H^i_{\mathrm{syn}}(X, n) = H^i(\operatorname{Tot}[\cdots]).

There is a canonical interpretation of these groups as extension groups in the derived category of admissible filtered (ϕ,N)(\phi,N)-modules (Fontaine's category), with explicit complexes and differentials constructed from log-rigid data (Yamada, 2015). This realizes log-rigid syntomic cohomology as absolute pp-adic Hodge cohomology, connecting syntomic regulators, KK-theoretic Chern classes, and cycles to analytic classes.

5. Representation in Arithmetic and Group Cohomology

A recent development is the construction of log-rigid analytic classes in the group cohomology of arithmetic groups. For SLn(Z)\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{Z}), "log-rigid analytic classes" are defined as group cohomology classes with values in modules of log-rigid analytic functions on Drinfeld's pp-adic symmetric domain Ωp\Omega_p: JE,cHn1(SLn(Z),Acrig,log(Ωp)).J_{E,c} \in H^{n-1}\left(\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{Z}), A_c^{\mathrm{rig}, \log}(\Omega_p)\right). The module Acrig,logA_c^{\mathrm{rig}, \log} consists of functions admitting (finite) sums of rigid-analytic functions and pp-adic logarithms of coordinate ratios, with a natural SLn(Qp)\mathrm{SL}_n(\mathbb{Q}_p)-action. These classes arise through a pp-adic Poisson transform applied to topological Eisenstein cocycles, establishing a bridge between topological, group-theoretic, and analytic perspectives (Roset et al., 12 Dec 2025).

A key phenomenon is that such classes, when evaluated at special pp-adic points associated to totally real fields F/QF/\mathbb{Q} where pp is inert, yield values conjecturally related to pp-adic logarithms of Gross–Stark units. For Galois fields, it is shown that the evaluations recover logp(uσa)\log_p(u^{\sigma_a}) exactly in Qp\mathbb{Q}_p, confirming the conjecture in this case.

6. Computational Methods and Explicit Examples

Log-rigid analytic classes are amenable to explicit Čech, de Rham, or spectral sequence computations. In the context of strictly semistable schemes, compact-support log-rigid cohomology can be computed from the combinatorics of the irreducible components: E1p,q=Hlog-rigq(Y(p),MD)    Hlog-rig,cp+q(Y),E_1^{p,q} = H^q_{\log\text{-}\mathrm{rig}}(Y^{(p)}, M_D) \implies H^{p+q}_{\log\text{-}\mathrm{rig},c}(Y), where Y(p)Y^{(p)} is the pp-fold intersection locus, each a dagger-affinoid space. Calculations yield explicit descriptions of pp-adic regulator maps and cycle classes, with applications to pp-adic Beilinson and Bloch–Kato conjectures (Ertl et al., 2020).

A prototypical example is the Tate curve, whose log-rigid cohomology yields canonical basis classes for which the Frobenius and monodromy operators, as well as comparison maps to de Rham cohomology, have explicit analytic and arithmetic formulas (Ertl et al., 2019).

7. Connections and Applications in pp-adic Arithmetic

Log-rigid analytic classes encode deep arithmetic invariants relevant to the study of pp-adic LL-functions, Stark-type conjectures, and the arithmetic of pp-adic regulators. Their explicit character enables effective calculation of syntomic and motivic regulators in settings with semistable reduction, and offers tools for constructing and analyzing pp-adic polylogarithms, Eisenstein classes, and arithmetic cycles in both the local and global pp-adic contexts (Roset et al., 12 Dec 2025, Yamada, 2015, Ertl et al., 2020).

Their relationship with extension groups of filtered (ϕ,N)(\phi,N)-modules underpins structural bridges between pp-adic Hodge theory, algebraic KK-theory, and the values of motivic LL-functions, establishing log-rigid analytic classes as pivotal objects in modern arithmetic geometry.

Topic to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Log-Rigid Analytic Classes.