Character-Based Dialogue Research

• Character-based dialogue research is a field focused on designing computational methods and datasets to generate and evaluate dialogues that consistently reflect detailed character personas and evolving interactions.
• It employs diverse architectures, from LSTM to transformer-based models, alongside multimodal approaches to achieve tailored and contextually grounded character expressions.
• Recent advances emphasize explicit persona conditioning, dynamic adaptation, and robust evaluation benchmarks to address challenges in maintaining character consistency and accurate relationship modeling.

Character-based dialogue research is concerned with computational methods, datasets, architectures, and evaluation methodologies for generating, understanding, and evaluating dialogues in which system responses are tailored to specific, well-defined character profiles. Characters in this context possess attributes such as persona, relationships, style, goals, and knowledge, which must be maintained and expressed through both the surface form and the underlying semantic or pragmatic content of the dialogue. The field encompasses modalities ranging from text generation and multi-turn narrative to expressive speech synthesis and grounded, multimodal storytelling.

1. Character Modeling and Representation

A core challenge is the explicit and implicit representation of character attributes in dialogue agents. Multiple approaches have emerged:

• Explicit persona conditioning: Agents are conditioned on structured profiles that may include biographies, personality types (e.g., MBTI, Big Five), and communication styles, often introduced as additional tokens or prompts during input encoding. PRODIGy (Occhipinti et al., 2023), for example, concatenates fields like <|id|>, MBTI types, and bios to structure inputs for generative models.
• Human-level attributes and tropes: Detailed “human-level attributes” (HLAs) are derived from cultural repositories such as TV Tropes, mapping characters not just to psychological traits but to trope-derived, interpretable attributes (e.g., “the genius,” “socially awkward”) to guide language production and retrieval tasks (Li et al., 2019).
• Dynamic profile learning: Some frameworks dynamically update or learn persona features from the aggregated dialogue context or interleaved annotation (for example, as with persona clusters and community detection modules in ALOHA (Li et al., 2019)).
• Latent character spaces: Several systems learn high-dimensional latent spaces that relate characters, personality traits, and style attributes, via collaborative filtering or matrix factorization.
• Contextual dynamic attributes: Recent datasets, such as HPD (Chen et al., 2022) and CharacterBench (Zhou et al., 16 Dec 2024), annotate dynamic relationships and attributes at the dialogue or chapter level to track the evolution of character state throughout a narrative.

A key implication is that the granularity and specificity of character representation materially affect the agent’s ability to maintain consistency, style, and believability across multi-turn or multi-scene narratives.

2. Dialogue Generation Architectures and Customization

Dialogue agents employ diverse architectures tailored for character consistency and adaptability:

• Seq2Seq and LSTM-based models: Early approaches used LSTM encoder-decoder architectures with cross-entropy–based training, extended with fine-tuning and active learning mechanisms (Asghar et al., 2016). These systems are capable of adapting to customized personas through supervised and online human-in-the-loop reinforcement.
• Transformer-based LLMs: Modern approaches fine-tune or prompt LLMs with additional persona, relationship, or style information. For instance, Neeko (Yu et al., 21 Feb 2024) uses dynamic, non-overlapping LoRA (low-rank adapter) modules, one per character, activated via a Mixture-of-Experts–style gating mechanism for efficient multi-character role adaptation, supporting seamless role transitions and incremental learning.
• Multi-task and hybrid architectures: In multi-character story continuation, models may perform multi-task learning, jointly considering next utterance ranking and next-character prediction using explicit persona and relationship state vectors (Si et al., 2021).
• Prompt engineering and dialogue filtering: End-to-end pipelines like PSYDIAL (Han et al., 1 Apr 2024) generate personality-specific conversations from LLMs using multi-stage, structured prompting and iterative filtering, emphasizing the need to circumvent generic “AI” outputs and enforce stylistic compliance.
• Knowledge-constrained and ontology-grounded generation: Task formulations in interactive storytelling or games often require dialogues faithful to lore, quests, and entity relationships. Tree-structured dialogue generation with constraints (as in KNUDGE (Weir et al., 2022)) ensures utterances are both ontologically consistent and reveal specific quest details.
• Mask-guided and attention-driven story visualization: For multi-character visual stories, bounded attention per object mask, identity-consistent self-attention, and region-aware cross-attention mechanisms are employed to ensure consistent rendering and alignment of depicted and verbalized character features across frames, as in TaleDiffusion (Banerjee et al., 4 Sep 2025).

Key technical innovations include custom attention mechanisms for identity persistence, dynamic adapter-based transfer for efficient multi-character modeling, and procedural or retrieval-augmented pipelines for controlling dialogue attributes at generation time.

3. Character Consistency, Relationship, and Interaction Modeling

High-fidelity character-based dialogue requires modeling not only persona but also inter-character relationships and evolving interactional contexts:

• Explicit relationship annotation and clustering: Datasets extend with pairwise relationship labels (friend-enemy-neutral) and their temporal evolution, derived from narrative or crowd-sourced descriptions and clustered/sentiment-labeled (CRD3 extended (Si et al., 2021); HPD (Chen et al., 2022)).
• Multi-dimensional extraction: Recent extraction systems, such as CREDI (Yan et al., 7 Jul 2025), employ dialogue structure (“A said to B”) and context for extracting relationships along axes of polarity, type (kinship/affiliative), and generational hierarchy, using parameter-efficient LLM fine-tuning.
• Dialogue memory and recursive narrative banks: To enable long-term consistency, narrative systems accumulate and condition on rolling histories of utterances (Recursive Narrative Bank in Action2Dialogue (Kang et al., 22 May 2025)), allowing characters to reference evolving events and maintain persistent goals and affective states.
• Strategic adaptation of dialogue moves: Analytical models quantify the trade-off between maintaining one’s persona (Big Five vector similarity), accommodating the perceived traits of interlocutors, and conforming with the expected conversational norms, expressed as a weighted sum in the move selection function (Abulimiti, 2023).

Accurate modeling of both self and relational context is essential for controlling dialogue move appropriateness and supporting coherent, evolving narrative interaction.

4. Datasets, Benchmarks, and Evaluation Methodologies

Progress in character-based dialogue has been enabled by the development of diverse, annotated datasets and robust, multi-dimensional evaluation protocols:

• Large-scale, richly annotated corpora: Key resources include HPD (bilingual Harry Potter Dialogue) (Chen et al., 2022), PRODIGy (profile-rich movie scripts) (Occhipinti et al., 2023), DialStory (Yao et al., 2022), and MultiTalk (emotionally expressive bilingual speech for multiple speakers) (Li et al., 20 Apr 2025). These datasets feature speaker attribution, persona/attribute tagging, scenario and scene annotation, dynamic relationship and emotion trajectories, and, in some cases, detailed knowledge graphs.
• Benchmarking character expressivity and customization: CharacterBench (Zhou et al., 16 Dec 2024) dissects role-playing ability across 11 dimensions (memory, knowledge, persona, emotion, morality, believability) using targeted, dimension-specific prompts and introduces automated evaluation via CharacterJudge.
• Profiling and fairness in evaluation: Tasks measure attribute consistency, alignment with dynamic scene cues, recall of personalized facts, and moral robustness. Evaluation combines automatic metrics (BLEU, ROUGE, Distinctness, Perplexity, Conditional Perplexity) with model-based scoring (e.g., CharacterJudge and GPT-4) and human preference studies, often revealing that LLMs remain substantially below skilled human outputs for certain nuanced dimensions.
• Dialogue act recognition at the character level: Context-sensitive, character-level models improve dialogue act identification by encoding subtle orthographic and pragmatic cues (e.g., mLSTM-based models (Bothe et al., 2018)).

The creation of high-coverage, multi-dimensional, and multilingual benchmarks is an active area, vital for robustly tracking progress in dialogue agent role-playing fidelity.

5. Multi-Modality, Dialogue Rendering, and Interactive Editing

Character-based dialogue systems increasingly extend beyond text to multimodal expressions:

• Speech synthesis with paralinguistic and emotional features: DialogueAgents (Li et al., 20 Apr 2025) integrates script generation, speech synthesis (emotionally nuanced, with explicit paralinguistic markers), and iterative script refinement through a critic agent, resulting in the MultiTalk speech dataset.
• Visual grounding in storytelling: Systems such as Action2Dialogue (Kang et al., 22 May 2025) and TaleDiffusion (Banerjee et al., 4 Sep 2025) produce visually grounded, frame-aligned dialogue grounded in frame-level visual features and scene context, with rendered speech/text bubbles assigned to characters using segmentation approaches (CLIPSeg).
• Interactive 3D character editing via dialogue: The ICE framework (Wu et al., 19 Mar 2024) parses user instructions over multiple dialogue rounds to iteratively adjust high-dimensional character model parameters (bone, makeup) via a semantic-guided low-dimensional solver, maintaining naturally rendered appearances and supporting direct control from progressive natural language commands.

The synergy between dialogue, vision, and speech synthesis raises new research challenges in cross-modal alignment and consistent persona expression across modalities.

6. Limitations, Challenges, and Emerging Directions

Recent work identifies several recurring challenges and suggests directions for future research:

• Subtlety of personality traits: Even state-of-the-art LLMs can capture overt traits (e.g., timidity) but often fail with subtler attributes (e.g., maturity or brooding affect), leading to overly generic or positive outputs (Nananukul et al., 29 Jul 2024).
• Long-term state and memory: Maintaining coherency of persona, relationships, and goal evolution across extended narratives or multi-party interactions remains problematic, despite progress in narrative memory banking and profile tracking (Kang et al., 22 May 2025, Zhou et al., 16 Dec 2024).
• Dynamic adaptation and scalability: Efficient support for large numbers of characters and on-the-fly persona adjustment without catastrophic interference is facilitated by approaches like dynamic LoRA adapters (Yu et al., 21 Feb 2024), but further innovations are needed to extend scalability, modularity, and efficiency.
• Evaluation bottlenecks and benchmarking gaps: Sparse manifestation of character features in responses complicates generative evaluation; thus, “targeted” dimension-specific prompts are becoming key to trigger explicit behaviors required for robust automatic evaluation (Zhou et al., 16 Dec 2024).
• Multilinguality and cross-cultural expressivity: Though several datasets are bilingual or non-English (e.g., Chinese DialStory (Yao et al., 2022), PSYDIAL Korean (Han et al., 1 Apr 2024)), systematic paper of cross-cultural persona expression is only emerging.

Future work will likely focus on more dynamic persona modeling, deeper narrative memory integration, automated evaluation across richer modalities and languages, and optimization for nuanced, context-sensitive character role-play.

---

Character-based dialogue research spans representation, architecture, multimodal storytelling, and rigorous evaluation. Recent advances point toward increasingly robust, adaptable, and contextually grounded dialogue agents, but multiple technical and conceptual challenges remain in the quest for truly consistent, engaging, and human-like character-centric conversations.