Equivalences via twisted hyperholomorphic sheaves from transverse Lagrangian fibrations
Abstract: Following ideas of Kapustka-Kapustka, we use Lagrangian fibrations to construct twisted hyperholomorphic sheaves on products of hyperkähler manifolds of K3<sup>[n]- and OG10-type. As applications, we prove the Lefschetz standard conjecture and the D-equivalence conjecture for hyperkähler manifolds of OG10-type.
- The D-equivalence conjecture for hyper-Kähler varieties via hyperholomorphic bundles (2024)
- Autoequivalences of Derived Categories of Bielliptic Surfaces (2026)
- Deformation Theory and Torus-Fixed Geometry of the Nested Hilbert Scheme of Points (2026)
- Rigidity theorems for cone structures (2026)
- On Toeplitz determinants with slow Fourier decay (2026)
- The quantum Hikita conjecture via quasimaps (2026)
- Quot scheme of points on torus knot singularities (2026)
- Quantized Volume Comparison for Fano Manifolds, II (2026)
- Disproof of the Yau--Tian--Donaldson conjecture (2026)
- Spectral Viterbo isomorphism: complex-oriented versus framed (2026)
Summary
- The paper constructs twisted hyperholomorphic vector bundles of rank n!k^n by convolving twisted Poincaré sheaves associated with transverse Lagrangian fibrations on K3^[n]- and OG10-type hyperkähler manifolds.
- The paper uses Hodge theory, LLV-equivariant deformations, stability, and Tate–Shafarevich twists to extend Fourier–Mukai equivalences across moduli spaces and establish universal twisted derived equivalences for these deformation types.
- The paper proves the Lefschetz standard conjecture and D-equivalence conjecture for projective OG10-type hyperkähler varieties, while also producing twisted equivalences between Fano varieties of lines on related cubic fourfolds.
The paper "Equivalences via twisted hyperholomorphic sheaves from transverse Lagrangian fibrations" (2608.13403) by Moritz Hartlieb and Saket Shah develops a new construction of twisted hyperholomorphic vector bundles on products of hyperkähler manifolds of K-type (K3[n]) and of OG-type (OG10). The construction follows a strategy proposed by Kapustka–Kapustka and yields two principal applications: proofs of the Lefschetz standard conjecture and the D-equivalence conjecture for projective hyperkähler varieties of OG10-type.
Overview of the construction
The starting point is a projective hyperkähler manifold Y of K- or OG-type admitting two transverse Lagrangian fibrations π1,π2:Y→Pn, meaning each fiber of π1 meets every fiber of π2 in finitely many points. Via Hodge-theoretic input, each fibration realizes Y as a Tate–Shafarevich twist of a compactified abelian scheme: in the K case this uses Markman's work on Lagrangian fibrations, while in the OG case it relies on Dutta–Mattei–Shinder's characterization of Tate–Shafarevich twists of Laza–Saccà–Voisin (LSV) fibrations associated to cubic fourfolds. This produces a diagram
X→Pn←Y→Pn←Z,
where K3[n]0 realizes K3[n]1 as a Tate–Shafarevich twist of K3[n]2 and K3[n]3 as a twist of K3[n]4. Work of Arinkin on compactified Jacobians, its twisted generalization by Bottini, and Yu's analogue for LSV fibrations supply Brauer classes K3[n]5, K3[n]6 together with twisted Poincaré sheaves inducing derived equivalences K3[n]7. The Fourier–Mukai kernel K3[n]8 of the composition is the central object: the paper's main structural result states that K3[n]9 is a twisted hyperholomorphic vector bundle of rank Y0 on Y1.
Hodge-theoretic framework
The deformation argument rests on Markman's theory of hyperholomorphic sheaves, adapted to the twisted setting. The authors formulate an assumption requiring that the Brauer classes be topologically trivial with B-field lifts such that the induced Hodge isometry Y2 between rational twisted Hodge structures is LLV-equivariant. Using Taelman's results identifying LLV-equivariant isometries with isometries of rational extended Mukai lattices Y3, they show that under this assumption the untwisted arguments of Markman carry over verbatim: a slope-stable kernel deforms over generic twistor paths in the moduli space Y4 of pairs, and any two points of a connected component can be joined by generic twistor paths. A technical point handled explicitly is that the Kapustka–Kapustka argument that a hyperholomorphic kernel induces a derived equivalence extends to twisted kernels; the only nontrivial modification concerns polystability of Hom bundles between fibers, resolved via polystability of endomorphism bundles and an indecomposability argument. The Brauer classes of the deformed kernels are controlled by a twisted variant of Čaldăraru's theorem, proved here by comparing topological twisting classes at the level of smooth transition functions.
Tate–Shafarevich twists of LSV systems
A key geometric input for the OG case is a Torelli-type theorem: if Y5 is a hyperkähler manifold of OG10-type with a primitive isotropic class Y6 such that Y7 is Hodge-isometric to Y8 for a very good cubic fourfold Y9, then K0 is birational to a Tate–Shafarevich twist of the LSV fibration K1; moreover, if K2 is nef, the birational map commutes with the Lagrangian fibrations. The proof combines the explicit period computation for K3, the identification of degenerate twistor deformations with Tate–Shafarevich families due to Abasheva–Rogov and Abasheva, and the birational Torelli theorem for OG10 manifolds. The nef case requires ruling out that reflections along prime exceptional divisors move the isotropic class, using a hyperbolic reflection group argument parallel to Markman's K4-type proof.
The authors note a genuine limitation of this characterization: when the period of K5 lies in the Hassett divisors K6 or K7, the cubic fourfold is not determined, and they can only conjecture the geometry — desingularized Beauville–Mukai systems K8 for K9 in the π1,π2:Y→Pn0 case, and π1,π2:Y→Pn1 birational to intermediate Jacobian fibrations of singular cubics in the π1,π2:Y→Pn2 case.
Cohomological action of the Poincaré sheaf
On the rank-four sublattice π1,π2:Y→Pn3 of the extended Mukai lattice spanned by the base class π1,π2:Y→Pn4, a generalized theta divisor π1,π2:Y→Pn5, and the hyperbolic plane generators, the Poincaré sheaf acts by an explicit formula involving half-integers π1,π2:Y→Pn6. The crucial complementary result is that on the Lagrangian primitive cohomology π1,π2:Y→Pn7, the Poincaré isometry restricts to multiplication by π1,π2:Y→Pn8 integrally. The proof deforms to Noether–Lefschetz divisors where the primitive cohomology has a unique Hodge class, then propagates the sign using a lattice lemma stating that any vector in an indefinite lattice is a difference of two primitive vectors of arbitrarily large negative square. The restriction to large negative square is essential: obtaining a Poincaré sheaf requires avoiding finitely many Noether–Lefschetz divisors (in the K3 case) or the Hassett divisors π1,π2:Y→Pn9 plus a codimension-two locus (in the cubic fourfold case).
Transverse fibrations from MBM classes
The examples with transverse fibrations are produced lattice-theoretically. Fixing π10 inside π11 or π12, surjectivity of the period map guarantees existence, and in the OG case one arranges that both quotients π13 correspond to very good cubic fourfolds. Since every integral algebraic class has square divisible by π14, choosing π15 larger than the uniform bound π16 on squares of MBM classes forces π17 to have no MBM classes at all; hence the Kähler cone equals the positive cone, all birational maps are biregular, and both boundary classes are nef, yielding Lagrangian fibrations whose product morphism is finite because π18 is ample. A Fujiki-formula computation gives the precise intersection number: transverse fibers meet in π19 points up to multiplicity, which also computes the rank of the convolution kernel π20.
Stability of π21 is established fiberwise: each restriction π22 is π23-stable with respect to a suitable polarization, by Bottini's proposition producing twisted locally free sheaves from finite covers, and stability is then extended from ample to Kähler classes via a lemma observing that stability depends only on pairings with rational Hodge classes, hence is insensitive to transcendental perturbations of the polarization. Combining with Markman's deformation criterion yields hyperholomorphicity, and consequently: for any hyperkähler manifold π24 of π25- or OG-type there exists another manifold π26 of the same type and a twisted vector bundle on π27 realizing a twisted derived equivalence. This universality statement is what powers the applications.
Applications
Lefschetz standard conjecture. For projective hyperkähler manifolds of OG10-type, the degree-reversing Hodge isometry induced by the positive-rank Fourier–Mukai kernel, combined with Markman's Lemma 1.6, proves Grothendieck's Lefschetz standard conjecture. This strictly generalizes earlier results of LSV-based and FFZ-type papers that covered lower-dimensional strata of the moduli space.
π28-cyclic isometries and Fano varieties. With explicit markings, the B-fields of the convolution kernel are computed exactly: π29 and Y0. The resulting isometry Y1 restricts on Lagrangian primitive cohomology to a Y2-cyclic isometry in Buskin's sense, realized as reflection across Y3 composed with an integral isometry. Via the Beauville–Donagi isometry Y4, this produces a Y5-cyclic Hodge isometry between the second cohomologies of the Fano varieties of lines Y6 and Y7, which by Markman's criterion yields a twisted derived equivalence Y8.
D-equivalence conjecture. Following the strategy of Maulik–Shen–Yin–Zhang, the paper proves that birational projective hyperkähler manifolds of OG10-type are derived equivalent. The proof reduces to adjacent chambers separated by an MBM class wall. Two lattice-theoretic lemmas replace their Y9-type analogues: an Eichler-criterion argument producing a divisibility-one class K0 with prescribed pairing against the MBM class K1 (using that the discriminant of K2 is K3), and a construction modifying K4 by a multiple of a transcendental-direction vector to obtain an isotropic divisibility-one class K5. Choosing the model manifold with K6 and transporting along an isometry sending K7 to K8, the B-field component K9 transports to X→Pn←Y→Pn←Z,0, which represents the trivial Brauer class since X→Pn←Y→Pn←Z,1 is algebraic and X→Pn←Y→Pn←Z,2 integral. Chaining equivalences through the auxiliary manifold gives X→Pn←Y→Pn←Z,3.
The authors remark that a fully twisted version of the MSYZ theorem should hold, contingent on whether a Brauer class admits a B-field lift isotropic for the BBF form — a question left open.
Limitations and open questions
Several caveats qualify the results. The construction requires the parameter X→Pn←Y→Pn←Z,4 to exceed the deformation-type-dependent MBM bound X→Pn←Y→Pn←Z,5, so the initial models are special points of the moduli space; the passage to arbitrary manifolds proceeds by twistor deformation rather than by direct construction. The identification of Tate–Shafarevich twists with LSV fibrations fails over the Hassett divisors X→Pn←Y→Pn←Z,6 and X→Pn←Y→Pn←Z,7, where the geometry is only conjectural. The paper also leaves open the comparison with Markman's original construction: is the twisted hyperholomorphic bundle X→Pn←Y→Pn←Z,8 deformation equivalent along diagonal twistor lines to the bundle X→Pn←Y→Pn←Z,9? Finally, the twisted strengthening of the MSYZ theorem remains unproven, tied to the isotropic B-field lift question noted above.
Conclusion
The paper establishes that transverse Lagrangian fibrations on hyperkähler manifolds of K3[n]00- and OG-type produce twisted hyperholomorphic vector bundles on products, via convolution of twisted Poincaré sheaves on compactified abelian fibrations. The construction transfers the known K3[n]01-type technology — Lefschetz standard conjecture, cyclic Hodge isometries, and the D-equivalence conjecture — to OG10-type, resolving both conjectures in that deformation type and yielding new twisted derived equivalences between Fano varieties of lines on related cubic fourfolds.
Paper to Video (Beta)
No one has generated a video about this paper yet.
Whiteboard
No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper.
Top Community Prompts
Continue Learning
- How does the twisted hyperholomorphic kernel Q relate to Markman’s original hyperholomorphic bundle construction?
- Why are the Hassett divisors C2 and C6 exceptional in the characterization of Tate–Shafarevich twists of LSV fibrations?
- How does the rank n!k^n of the Fourier–Mukai kernel arise from the intersection theory of transverse Lagrangian fibers?
- What conditions would prove the fully twisted version of the Maulik–Shen–Yin–Zhang derived-equivalence theorem?
- Find recent papers about twisted derived equivalences of hyperkähler manifolds.
Tweets
Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.