Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Where Thermodynamics Meets Geometry: Critical-Radius Coincidences in Confining-NED Black Holes with Barrow Entropy

Published 5 Jul 2026 in gr-qc and hep-th | (2607.04173v1)

Abstract: We study a static, spherically symmetric black hole obtained from Einstein gravity coupled to a nonlinear electrodynamics model with a quark--antiquark confinement interaction. The metric extends Reissner--Nordström by a logarithmic correction controlled by ζζ, modifying both horizon structure and the near-singularity regime. The Hamilton--Jacobi tunneling method for Dirac fermions yields the Hawking temperature; the ζζ-dependent terms suppress the small-horizon divergence and signal a remnant. Quantum-gravitational fluctuations are incorporated through Barrow entropy with deformation index ΔΔ. Within the extended phase space we compute the internal energy, free energy, pressure, heat capacity, isothermal compressibility, and Joule--Thomson coefficient. The heat capacity locates ΔΔ-dependent stability regions; the compressibility stays negative across the domain analysed here, marking a mechanically rigid phase with no van der Waals criticality in this branch. The central result is a quadruple coincidence: the peak Hawking temperature, the heat-capacity divergence, the Joule--Thomson inversion, and the zero of the radial tidal force all sit at one radius rr_\star defined by $A''(r_\star)=0$, while the extremal horizon and the angular tidal-force zero coincide via $A'(r_h)=0$. These reduce the full critical-point analysis to two scalar equations on A(r)A(r). Geometric tidal accelerations are mapped against the thermodynamic critical curves. Event Horizon Telescope observations of Sgr~A* translate into a constraint ζ0.7ζ\lesssim 0.7 at Q/M=0.5Q/M=0.5, leaving a finite window open. The confinement term induces observable corrections to geodesic deviation.

Authors (2)

Summary

  • The paper identifies a coincidence of critical radii where thermodynamic singularities, such as heat capacity divergence and Joule–Thomson inversion, align with geometric features like tidal force peaks.
  • It employs a modified Reissner–Nordström metric with logarithmic corrections that model quark–antiquark confinement and incorporates quantum gravitational effects via Barrow entropy.
  • Key implications include predicting observable signatures in photon-sphere properties and providing constraints for horizon-scale imaging of black hole critical phenomena.

Critical-Radius Coincidences in Confining-NED Black Holes with Barrow Entropy

Introduction

The paper develops a comprehensive analysis of static, spherically symmetric black holes generated by Einstein gravity coupled to nonlinear electrodynamics (NED) of a confinement type, with a particular focus on the logarithmic deformation parameter ζ\zeta modeling quark–antiquark confinement. In addition to standard thermodynamic investigation, the framework incorporates quantum-gravitational horizon fluctuations via Barrow entropy, parameterized by a deformation index Δ\Delta. A distinctive aspect of this work is the revealed algebraic coincidence of thermodynamic and geometric critical radii in this class of spacetimes, and the direct connection to tidal forces and observable photon sphere properties.

Confining NED Geometry and Metric Deformation

The underlying black hole solution extends the standard Reissner–Nordström (RN) metric by a logarithmic correction, controlled by the parameter ζ\zeta, which introduces a confinement effect analogous to nonabelian gauge dynamics. The metric function A(r)A(r) for the solution is:

A(r)=12Mr+Q2r24QQζ3rlnrA(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{Q^2}{r^2}-\frac{4Q\sqrt{Q}\,\zeta}{3r}\ln r

where MM is the ADM mass and QQ is the electric charge. This correction modifies the horizon structure and regularizes the near-singularity regime.

Quantum Tunneling and Hawking Temperature

Hawking emission is derived via the Hamilton–Jacobi tunneling method for Dirac fermions. The surface gravity relation is recovered without ambiguity, and the emission temperature is given by:

TH=A(rh)4πT_H = \frac{A'(r_h)}{4\pi}

where rhr_h designates the horizon. The key finding is that the logarithmic ζ\zeta-dependent terms in Δ\Delta0 suppress the usual small-horizon divergence of Δ\Delta1, favoring the appearance of a black hole remnant.

Figure 1

Figure 1: Hawking temperature Δ\Delta2 as a function of the horizon radius Δ\Delta3 for various values of Δ\Delta4; the emission peak coincides with the critical radius Δ\Delta5.

As Δ\Delta6 increases, the temperature maximum shifts to larger Δ\Delta7 and the amplitude decreases, pointing to a more massive, longer-lived remnant, as evidenced by modulation of the endpoint mass and peak temperature.

Barrow Entropy and Extended Thermodynamic Potentials

Quantum-gravitational fluctuations of the event horizon are incorporated through Barrow entropy:

Δ\Delta8

where Δ\Delta9. All core thermodynamic potentials—internal energy ζ\zeta0, Helmholtz free energy ζ\zeta1, pressure ζ\zeta2, heat capacity ζ\zeta3, isothermal compressibility ζ\zeta4, and the Joule–Thomson coefficient ζ\zeta5—are explicitly computed with both ζ\zeta6 and ζ\zeta7 dependencies.

Figure 2

Figure 2: Internal energy ζ\zeta8 as a function of ζ\zeta9 at fixed A(r)A(r)0, A(r)A(r)1, and A(r)A(r)2 for varying A(r)A(r)3.

Barrow deformation increases the effective heat storage capacity. For all thermodynamic variables, the quantum (A(r)A(r)4) corrections become negligible at large A(r)A(r)5, where semiclassical Bekenstein–Hawking thermodynamics is restored.

Figure 3

Figure 3: Helmholtz free energy A(r)A(r)6 against A(r)A(r)7 for selected A(r)A(r)8, illustrating monotonic behavior and absence of first-order phase transition.

Figure 4

Figure 4: Pressure A(r)A(r)9 as a function of A(r)=12Mr+Q2r24QQζ3rlnrA(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{Q^2}{r^2}-\frac{4Q\sqrt{Q}\,\zeta}{3r}\ln r0 for different Barrow indices A(r)=12Mr+Q2r24QQζ3rlnrA(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{Q^2}{r^2}-\frac{4Q\sqrt{Q}\,\zeta}{3r}\ln r1.

The heat capacity A(r)=12Mr+Q2r24QQζ3rlnrA(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{Q^2}{r^2}-\frac{4Q\sqrt{Q}\,\zeta}{3r}\ln r2, given by Barrow-modified expressions, encodes the phase structure: stability, divergence loci, and transition points.

Figure 5

Figure 5: Heat capacity A(r)=12Mr+Q2r24QQζ3rlnrA(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{Q^2}{r^2}-\frac{4Q\sqrt{Q}\,\zeta}{3r}\ln r3 as a function of A(r)=12Mr+Q2r24QQζ3rlnrA(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{Q^2}{r^2}-\frac{4Q\sqrt{Q}\,\zeta}{3r}\ln r4 for multiple A(r)=12Mr+Q2r24QQζ3rlnrA(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{Q^2}{r^2}-\frac{4Q\sqrt{Q}\,\zeta}{3r}\ln r5, showing the transition from unstable to stable regimes.

Joule–Thomson and Compressibility

The Joule–Thomson coefficient A(r)=12Mr+Q2r24QQζ3rlnrA(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{Q^2}{r^2}-\frac{4Q\sqrt{Q}\,\zeta}{3r}\ln r6 exhibits sign changes marking thermodynamic inversion points that coincide precisely with the second-order phase transition (heat capacity divergence). The isothermal compressibility A(r)=12Mr+Q2r24QQζ3rlnrA(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{Q^2}{r^2}-\frac{4Q\sqrt{Q}\,\zeta}{3r}\ln r7 remains negative for all analyzed parameters, indicating mechanical rigidity and suppression of van der Waals-like criticality.

Figure 6

Figure 6: Joule–Thomson coefficient A(r)=12Mr+Q2r24QQζ3rlnrA(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{Q^2}{r^2}-\frac{4Q\sqrt{Q}\,\zeta}{3r}\ln r8 vs. A(r)=12Mr+Q2r24QQζ3rlnrA(r)=1-\frac{2M}{r}+\frac{Q^2}{r^2}-\frac{4Q\sqrt{Q}\,\zeta}{3r}\ln r9, with inversion points tracking MM0 divergence.

Figure 7

Figure 7: Isothermal compressibility MM1 vs. MM2; MM3 is always negative, supporting the absence of mechanical instability.

Critical-Radius Coincidences and Scalar Reductions

A central analytical result is the identification of quadruple and pairwise coincidence of critical radii. The following four physically independent phenomena all occur at the same radius MM4 determined by MM5:

  • Maximum of Hawking temperature
  • Divergence of heat capacity
  • Joule–Thomson inversion
  • Zero-crossing of radial tidal force

Similarly, the extremal horizon (MM6) and angular tidal-force zero coincide at MM7.

Figure 8

Figure 8: The three characteristic radii—unified critical radius MM8, extremal horizon MM9, and remnant radius QQ0—as functions of QQ1.

The ordering QQ2 and the nearly linear dependence on QQ3 is clear. The remnant mass increases by up to QQ4 compared to the extremal RN value at maximal confinement.

Geodesic Deviation and Tidal Forces

The geometric nature of the critical points is established by radial and angular tidal accelerations, computed in the orthonormal frame of infalling observers. The radial acceleration QQ5 peaks at QQ6, while the angular component QQ7 vanishes at the extremal horizon.

Figure 9

Figure 9: Radial tidal acceleration QQ8 vs. QQ9 for varying TH=A(rh)4πT_H = \frac{A'(r_h)}{4\pi}0; the peak occurs at TH=A(rh)4πT_H = \frac{A'(r_h)}{4\pi}1.

Figure 10

Figure 10: Angular tidal acceleration TH=A(rh)4πT_H = \frac{A'(r_h)}{4\pi}2 vs. TH=A(rh)4πT_H = \frac{A'(r_h)}{4\pi}3; zero-crossing matches the extremal horizon.

This correspondence aligns thermodynamic phase structure with concrete, observer-measurable geometric features.

Observational Consequences

The CNED correction influences photon-sphere and shadow observables. The photon-sphere radius TH=A(rh)4πT_H = \frac{A'(r_h)}{4\pi}4 and the corresponding shadow size TH=A(rh)4πT_H = \frac{A'(r_h)}{4\pi}5 both increase with TH=A(rh)4πT_H = \frac{A'(r_h)}{4\pi}6, producing an effect TH=A(rh)4πT_H = \frac{A'(r_h)}{4\pi}7 in the relevant parameter regime. Event Horizon Telescope measurements of Sgr~A* constrain TH=A(rh)4πT_H = \frac{A'(r_h)}{4\pi}8 at TH=A(rh)4πT_H = \frac{A'(r_h)}{4\pi}9.

This links the phase and geometric criticalities to potential constraints via current or future horizon-scale interferometry and quasi-periodic oscillation data.

Theoretical Implications and Outlook

The algebraic collapse of thermodynamic and geometric criticalities to two equations—rhr_h0 and rhr_h1—uniquely characterizes the extended confining-NED class, irrespective of the detailed entropy framework (Barrow, R\'enyi, Sharma–Mittal, Tsallis-Cirto). The effect of Barrow (fractal) deformation is mainly to alter the mechanical and thermal response, not the location of critical phenomena.

Future directions include generalization to axisymmetric/rotating black holes and evaluation of quasinormal spectra to connect observable ringdown to the critical topology. The sensitivity of shadow features to rhr_h2 motivates targeted astrophysical analyses as data quality from next-generation horizon-scale facilities improves.

Conclusion

This work provides a detailed mapping between the thermodynamic, quantum, and geometric structures of confining-NED black holes with Barrow entropy. The coincidence of critical radii for diverse physical effects reduces the analysis to the properties of the metric function and its derivatives, setting a structure that is both computationally expedient and physically transparent. The predicted observable signatures and their quantitative connection to the confinement parameter support the viability of using horizon-scale imaging to probe strong-field quantum and nonabelian corrections to GR backgrounds.


Essay based on "Where Thermodynamics Meets Geometry: Critical-Radius Coincidences in Confining-NED Black Holes with Barrow Entropy" (2607.04173).

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 2 likes about this paper.