Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Fukaya categories of Coulomb branches as unique deformations

Published 30 Jun 2026 in math.RT, math.RA, and math.SG | (2607.00146v1)

Abstract: The symplectic geometry of Coulomb branches is complicated and it is particularly difficult to determine their Fukaya categories. Relative Fukaya categories present an approach to circumvent these difficulties by first computing the Fukaya category of the complement of a divisor and then solving a deformation problem. In this paper, we apply this approach to the specific case of horizontal Hilbert schemes by removing their matter divisor and narrowing down the set of possible deformations through an additional Z<sup>2</sup> \mathbb{Z}<sup>2</sup> -grading. We utilize an existing description of the Fukaya category after removal of the matter divisor, in particular we use a specific generating Lagrangian and the identification between its endomorphism algebra and the NilHecke algebra. The core of this paper consists of solving the deformation problem, after which we recover the result of Aganagic et al.

Authors (1)

Summary

  • The paper proves that the relative Fukaya category of planar horizontal Hilbert schemes is equivalent to the NilHecke algebra, using deformation rigidity instead of explicit holomorphic disk counts.
  • A Z²-grading and Hochschild cohomology calculation show that the undeformed algebra has exactly one nontrivial deformation direction, parameterized by a scalar.
  • The result recovers the wrapped Fukaya category–KLRW algebra correspondence in this setting while highlighting open questions about extending deformation uniqueness to broader Coulomb branches.

The paper "Fukaya categories of Coulomb branches as unique deformations" by Jasper van de Kreeke (2607.00146) provides an alternative proof of the identification between the wrapped Fukaya category of a multiplicative Coulomb branch and a Khovanov–Lauda–Rouquier–Webb (KLRW) algebra, in the special case of planar horizontal Hilbert schemes. Rather than performing the explicit disk-counting computations of Aganagic–Danilenko–Li–Shende–Zhou [ADLSZ], the author recovers their result by showing that the relative Fukaya category is forced to be the NilHecke algebra because it is the unique non-trivial Z2\mathbb{Z}^2-graded deformation of a common base algebra.

Background and strategy

Coulomb branches of 3d N=4\mathcal{N}=4 gauge theories were given a rigorous mathematical definition as spectra of K-theoretic algebras by Braverman–Finkelberg–Nakajima. Aganagic et al. computed the Fukaya categories of multiplicative Coulomb branches of framed quiver settings via an explicit generating system of Lagrangians TθT_\theta indexed by strand diagrams, establishing an equivalence

TwKLRW(Γ,d)relFuk(M×(Γ,d),W).TwKLRW(\Gamma, d) \simeq relFuk(\mathcal{M}^\times(\Gamma,d), W).

This paper restricts to planar horizontal Hilbert schemes Y=Hilbk(C×C)Y = Hilb_k(\mathbb{C}^* \times \mathbb{C}), for which the relevant KLRW algebras are the classical NilHecke algebras NHkNH_k. The proof strategy follows Seidel's relative Fukaya technique: remove the matter divisor (the big diagonal where two yiy_i-coordinates coincide), compute the Fukaya category of the complement using the known description from ADLSZ, and then solve the resulting deformation problem. The key observation is that both the relative Fukaya category relFuk(YW)LrelFuk(Y_W)_L and the algebra NHkNH_k are deformations of the same base object—the =0\hbar = 0 specialization N=4\mathcal{N}=40—and that an additional N=4\mathcal{N}=41-grading leaves only one possible non-trivial deformation over N=4\mathcal{N}=42, forcing the two to be equivalent.

Graded deformation theory framework

A substantial portion of the paper develops a graded version of N=4\mathcal{N}=43-deformation theory. The author defines completed N=4\mathcal{N}=44-graded deformation bases—complete local Noetherian N=4\mathcal{N}=45-algebras whose quotients N=4\mathcal{N}=46 carry compatible N=4\mathcal{N}=47-gradings—and notes that such bases need not admit direct sum decompositions into homogeneous components (e.g., N=4\mathcal{N}=48 with N=4\mathcal{N}=49 is not itself TθT_\theta0-graded as a vector space). On this foundation, graded Maurer-Cartan elements and graded gauge equivalences are defined for TθT_\theta1-algebras and TθT_\theta2-categories, with the Hochschild DGLA controlling deformations.

Two technical results carry significant weight. First, a graded push-pull lemma establishes that any graded Maurer-Cartan element is homogeneously gauge equivalent to its image under the minimal model inclusion-composition TθT_\theta3. Second, the deformation theory of quiver algebras with reduction systems (following Chouhy–Solotar and Barmeier–Wang) is extended to the graded setting: when the quiver and reduction relations are TθT_\theta4-homogeneous, the projective bimodule resolution, the induced TθT_\theta5-structure on TθT_\theta6, and the quasi-isomorphism to the Hochschild DGLA are all TθT_\theta7-homogeneous. This allows infinitesimal deformations to be read off directly as deformed reduction rules that remain reduction-unique.

The paper also includes supporting lemmas on perfect modules over deformed algebras, showing that flat deformations lift generators, kernels, images, and projective resolutions—establishing that TθT_\theta8 is a loose object-cloning deformation of TθT_\theta9.

Geometry of the horizontal Hilbert scheme

The horizontal Hilbert scheme TwKLRW(Γ,d)relFuk(M×(Γ,d),W).TwKLRW(\Gamma, d) \simeq relFuk(\mathcal{M}^\times(\Gamma,d), W).0 is realized as the symmetrized variety of points TwKLRW(Γ,d)relFuk(M×(Γ,d),W).TwKLRW(\Gamma, d) \simeq relFuk(\mathcal{M}^\times(\Gamma,d), W).1 with TwKLRW(Γ,d)relFuk(M×(Γ,d),W).TwKLRW(\Gamma, d) \simeq relFuk(\mathcal{M}^\times(\Gamma,d), W).2, together with slope data TwKLRW(Γ,d)relFuk(M×(Γ,d),W).TwKLRW(\Gamma, d) \simeq relFuk(\mathcal{M}^\times(\Gamma,d), W).3 satisfying TwKLRW(Γ,d)relFuk(M×(Γ,d),W).TwKLRW(\Gamma, d) \simeq relFuk(\mathcal{M}^\times(\Gamma,d), W).4. Three Liouville structures are constructed:

  • TwKLRW(Γ,d)relFuk(M×(Γ,d),W).TwKLRW(\Gamma, d) \simeq relFuk(\mathcal{M}^\times(\Gamma,d), W).5: the full Hilbert scheme with pullback Liouville form from an affine embedding.
  • TwKLRW(Γ,d)relFuk(M×(Γ,d),W).TwKLRW(\Gamma, d) \simeq relFuk(\mathcal{M}^\times(\Gamma,d), W).6: TwKLRW(Γ,d)relFuk(M×(Γ,d),W).TwKLRW(\Gamma, d) \simeq relFuk(\mathcal{M}^\times(\Gamma,d), W).7 cut along the locus TwKLRW(Γ,d)relFuk(M×(Γ,d),W).TwKLRW(\Gamma, d) \simeq relFuk(\mathcal{M}^\times(\Gamma,d), W).8 for the potential TwKLRW(Γ,d)relFuk(M×(Γ,d),W).TwKLRW(\Gamma, d) \simeq relFuk(\mathcal{M}^\times(\Gamma,d), W).9, forming a Liouville sector via chimney attachment.
  • Y=Hilbk(C×C)Y = Hilb_k(\mathbb{C}^* \times \mathbb{C})0: obtained by removing a neighborhood of the big diagonal, truncating ends in the Y=Hilbk(C×C)Y = Hilb_k(\mathbb{C}^* \times \mathbb{C})1- and Y=Hilbk(C×C)Y = Hilb_k(\mathbb{C}^* \times \mathbb{C})2-directions, smoothing corners, quotienting by Y=Hilbk(C×C)Y = Hilb_k(\mathbb{C}^* \times \mathbb{C})3, and applying the same potential cut.

A simplified model expresses Y=Hilbk(C×C)Y = Hilb_k(\mathbb{C}^* \times \mathbb{C})4 as the symmetric product of Y=Hilbk(C×C)Y = Hilb_k(\mathbb{C}^* \times \mathbb{C})5 base rectangles (with two stops each) and Y=Hilbk(C×C)Y = Hilb_k(\mathbb{C}^* \times \mathbb{C})6 fiber cylinders (one stop each), which facilitates explicit Floer-theoretic computation. The standard Lagrangian Y=Hilbk(C×C)Y = Hilb_k(\mathbb{C}^* \times \mathbb{C})7 is a product of radial segments in the annuli and vertical segments in the rectangles; its wrappings Y=Hilbk(C×C)Y = Hilb_k(\mathbb{C}^* \times \mathbb{C})8 wind positively around the fiber cylinders. The key input from ADLSZ is the identification

Y=Hilbk(C×C)Y = Hilb_k(\mathbb{C}^* \times \mathbb{C})9

where generators NHkNH_k0 correspond to self-intersections in the fiber direction and NHkNH_k1 to crossings of adjacent strands.

The NHkNH_k2-grading and relative Fukaya category

The central innovation is the introduction of two independent winding-number gradings via grading functions

NHkNH_k3

For contractible Lagrangians avoiding the zero loci of these functions, degrees of intersection points and holomorphic disks are defined by integrals of NHkNH_k4 along boundary paths. Non-negativity of disk degrees follows from the argument principle applied to NHkNH_k5. Applying the construction twice yields a NHkNH_k6-graded deformation NHkNH_k7 over NHkNH_k8; setting NHkNH_k9 produces the desired deformation over yiy_i0.

On the algebraic side, yiy_i1 carries the yiy_i2-grading yiy_i3, yiy_i4, and all defining relations (yiy_i5, dot-passing relations with coefficient yiy_i6, braid relations) are homogeneous. Graphically, the yiy_i7-degree of yiy_i8 equals 1 because yiy_i9 makes a half-turn around zero, while the relFuk(YW)LrelFuk(Y_W)_L0-degree of relFuk(YW)LrelFuk(Y_W)_L1 equals relFuk(YW)LrelFuk(Y_W)_L2 because relFuk(YW)LrelFuk(Y_W)_L3 winds negatively around the origin. The existing identification relFuk(YW)LrelFuk(Y_W)_L4 is verified to respect this relFuk(YW)LrelFuk(Y_W)_L5-grading.

Hochschild cohomology computation

Presenting relFuk(YW)LrelFuk(Y_W)_L6 as a quiver algebra with a reduction-unique reduction system, the author computes the degree-relFuk(YW)LrelFuk(Y_W)_L7 component of Hochschild cohomology. The space relFuk(YW)LrelFuk(Y_W)_L8 has basis elements determined by values on the ambiguity paths relFuk(YW)LrelFuk(Y_W)_L9, NHkNH_k0, and NHkNH_k1 (NHkNH_k2), with all other ambiguities mapping to zero. A lengthy but systematic evaluation of NHkNH_k3 on 1-ambiguities forces NHkNH_k4 for all off-diagonal indices and NHkNH_k5 for a single scalar NHkNH_k6. The result is:

NHkNH_k7

where NHkNH_k8, NHkNH_k9, and =0\hbar = 00 vanishes on all other degree-=0\hbar = 01 ambiguities. Moreover, =0\hbar = 02 for =0\hbar = 03. Consequently,

=0\hbar = 04

and distinct values of =0\hbar = 05 yield pairwise non-gauge-equivalent Maurer-Cartan elements. All deformations and functors are automatically locally algebraic (defined over =0\hbar = 06 rather than requiring formal power series).

Classification and main theorem

Every non-trivial =0\hbar = 07-graded deformation is classified up to gauge equivalence by a scalar =0\hbar = 08, extracted concretely as the coefficient satisfying =0\hbar = 09. Explicit representatives N=4\mathcal{N}=400 are given by deformed reduction rules N=4\mathcal{N}=401 on the ambiguities N=4\mathcal{N}=402. Using the graded push-pull lemma and a substitution automorphism of the deformation base, any non-trivial deformation is shown to be N=4\mathcal{N}=403-isomorphic (though not necessarily N=4\mathcal{N}=404-linearly isomorphic) to the standard deformation N=4\mathcal{N}=405.

Since ADLSZ established that N=4\mathcal{N}=406 has nonzero scalar N=4\mathcal{N}=407—i.e., it is a non-trivial deformation—the uniqueness result immediately yields the main theorem:

Theorem. There is an isomorphism of N=4\mathcal{N}=408-categories

N=4\mathcal{N}=409

Specializing at N=4\mathcal{N}=410 recovers the ADLSZ result N=4\mathcal{N}=411 without performing their final disk-counting assembly. The functor N=4\mathcal{N}=412 may involve a rescaling N=4\mathcal{N}=413, so it is not canonical over the deformation base.

Limitations and open questions

Several caveats qualify the scope of the result. First, the argument relies on the prior computation of N=4\mathcal{N}=414 from ADLSZ section 7, so the paper does not eliminate dependence on earlier work entirely—it circumvents only the disk-counting of ADLSZ section 8. Second, the non-triviality of the deformation N=4\mathcal{N}=415 (nonzero scalar N=4\mathcal{N}=416) is invoked from ADLSZ rather than proven intrinsically here; the appendix offers a partial geometric approach via three explicitly constructed Lagrangians with intersection products N=4\mathcal{N}=417, but this is presented as indicative rather than complete. Third, several technical points are flagged as incomplete in the source: the definition of Liouville manifolds-with-boundary is deferred, order conventions in the Barmeier–Wang resolution require correction, and the claim that every completed graded deformation base arises as a completion of a graded noetherian algebra is left unresolved. Fourth, the generalization beyond planar horizontal Hilbert schemes—to arbitrary framed quivers or non-planar Coulomb branches—is not addressed; whether the corresponding KLRW algebras also admit unique N=4\mathcal{N}=418-graded deformations remains open. Finally, the appendix observes empirically that certain families of twisted complexes appear uncurvable in N=4\mathcal{N}=419, but no general criterion is established.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates that for horizontal Hilbert schemes, the equivalence between Fukaya categories of Coulomb branches and NilHecke algebras can be obtained through rigidity of graded deformations rather than explicit holomorphic disk enumeration. The essential mechanism—an additional N=4\mathcal{N}=420-grading collapsing the deformation space to a one-parameter family with a unique non-trivial class—provides a template that may extend to other Coulomb branch settings where generating Lagrangians and divisor complements are understood, though confirming this requires resolving the open questions identified above.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.