- The paper proves that every $C_n$-submodule of the trivial component of canonically graded $\mathrm{M}_n(\mathbb{F})$ occurs as the image of a multilinear graded polynomial when $\operatorname{char}\mathbb{F}\nmid n$.
- Using character-based polynomials and Galois descent, the authors realize irreducible components and their sums over arbitrary fields, disproving Centrone and de Mello’s conjecture.
- For $n=3$ over fields containing a primitive cube root of unity, the image of every multilinear graded polynomial studied is a vector subspace, while the general case remains open.
Context and motivation
The L'vov–Kaplansky problem asks whether the image of a multilinear polynomial evaluated on a matrix algebra is necessarily a vector subspace. Positive answers are known for 2×2 matrices [Kanel-Belov, Malev, Rowen], with partial results for 3×3 matrices, and the question has been studied for many classes of algebras including upper triangular matrices and Lie algebras. A graded variant of the problem was pursued by Centrone and de Mello, who studied multilinear polynomials in graded variables evaluated on Mn(Q) equipped with the canonical (Vasilovsky) Cn-grading. They described the linear span of such images over Q and conjectured that their description holds over an arbitrary base field. The paper under review, by da Silva and Yasumura, refutes that conjecture by proving a stronger structural statement: every Cn-submodule of the trivial component of the grading arises as the image of some multilinear polynomial in graded variables.
Setup
Throughout, Cn=⟨α⟩ is cyclic of order n, and F is a field with charF=p∤n. The canonical grading on 3×30 assigns to each 3×31 the span of matrix units 3×32 with 3×33. Identifying 3×34 with the cycle 3×35, the algebra becomes a 3×36-module via 3×37, an action compatible with the grading. Evaluations take place in the free 3×38-graded associative algebra 3×39, with Mn(Q)0 denoting variables of homogeneous degree Mn(Q)1.
For each character Mn(Q)2, the authors introduce the element
Mn(Q)3
which spans a one-dimensional irreducible Mn(Q)4-submodule Mn(Q)5 of the trivial component Mn(Q)6, and the multilinear polynomial
Mn(Q)7
Realizing irreducible submodules as images
The core technical observation is that, setting Mn(Q)8 (indices modulo Mn(Q)9), the polynomial Cn0 vanishes on all Cn1-tuples of the Cn2 except cyclic permutations of Cn3, on which it takes values in Cn4; since Cn5 is one-dimensional, this yields Cn6. Orthogonality is achieved via the elements Cn7: one has Cn8, where Cn9. Consequently, when Q0 contains a primitive Q1-th root of unity, any sum Q2 has image exactly Q3.
Dropping the roots-of-unity hypothesis
The general case is handled via Galois descent. Letting Q4 be a splitting field of Q5 over Q6, the group algebra decomposes as Q7 into simple components, and after scalar extension each primitive central idempotent Q8 corresponds to a Galois orbit Q9. The key point is that the orbit-summed polynomial
Cn0
has coefficients fixed by Cn1, hence lies in Cn2, and its image equals the submodule Cn3. Since every Cn4-submodule of the regular representation — identified here with Cn5 — is a direct sum of such components, summing the corresponding Cn6 gives the main theorem: every Cn7-submodule of Cn8 is the image of some multilinear polynomial in graded variables.
This immediately refutes Conjecture 1 of Centrone and de Mello: if all images were as conjectured, the attainable images would be restricted, whereas the theorem shows that arbitrary submodules — including proper subspaces of the spans they predicted — occur as images. The negative answer holds over any field whose characteristic does not divide Cn9.
Images as vector spaces: the Cn=⟨α⟩0 case
The authors also revisit the original L'vov-type question in the graded setting: is the image of a multilinear graded polynomial always a vector subspace? The polynomials Cn=⟨α⟩1, indexed by Cn=⟨α⟩2 and Cn=⟨α⟩3, form a basis of the degree-Cn=⟨α⟩4 multilinear polynomials in the Cn=⟨α⟩5. For Cn=⟨α⟩6 over a field containing a primitive cube root of unity, they prove that the image of any such polynomial is indeed a vector subspace. The proof splits into cases: evaluations at combinations of the Cn=⟨α⟩7 settle most coefficient configurations directly, while the remaining case — where coefficients Cn=⟨α⟩8 and Cn=⟨α⟩9 are both nonzero with vanishing sum — is handled by two explicit evaluations showing closure under scalar multiples and sums. Notably, this positive result is established only for n0; the general case remains open.
Limitations and open questions
Several restrictions should be noted. The main theorem concerns only submodules of the trivial component n1; whether analogous realization results hold for other homogeneous components is not addressed. The characteristic assumption n2 is essential to the semisimple representation theory used throughout, and the case n3 is left untreated. The positive answer on images being vector spaces requires n4 and a primitive cube root of unity in the base field; the authors explicitly leave open whether the image of a multilinear graded polynomial is a vector subspace in general.
Conclusion
This note establishes that the n5-module structure induced on the trivial component of the canonically graded matrix algebra is fully realized by images of multilinear graded polynomials: every submodule occurs as such an image. This yields a definitive negative answer to the 2023 conjecture of Centrone and de Mello and demonstrates that the graded version of the L'vov problem exhibits strictly richer behavior than its ungraded counterpart. The positive result for n6 suggests that the vector-subspace question in the graded setting may have a more delicate answer depending on n7 and the base field.