Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Prism: Structural Symmetry Scanning via Duality-Constrained Laplacian Projection

Published 18 May 2026 in cs.SI and cs.LG | (2605.20245v1)

Abstract: We introduce \textbf{Prism}, a framework for structural symmetry diagnosis in complex networks. Given a graph Laplacian $L$ and a duality operator $P$ (a symmetric involution), Prism computes the \emph{duality defect} $δ(L,P) = |LP - PL|_F / |L|_F$ -- a scalar measuring how far the network deviates from structural self-consistency. When $P$ encodes the network's true symmetry, $δ$ starts near zero and rises monotonically as structure degrades; an arbitrary $P$ gives noise. We prove that the optimal $L'$ satisfying $[L', P] = 0$ is given by a closed-form block-diagonal projection, and provide an unsupervised alternating optimization that learns $P$ from the graph's own Fiedler vector. Experiments on synthetic networks show the true-$P$ defect is $3.38\times$ more sensitive to structural degradation than an index-reversal baseline and more sensitive than modularity. On Zachary's Karate Club with edge noise, Prism achieves $94.5\%$ community detection accuracy at $5\%$ noise versus $76.6\%$ for the raw Laplacian baseline. Applied to live S&P~500 data (2026-05-17), Prism detects rising structural stress (defect $0.43 \to 0.73$ over 90 days) while surface correlations remain low -- a signal invisible to correlation-based methods. In a historical backtest spanning five major stress events (2011--2020), the duality defect exhibits a consistent pattern: it reaches elevated levels \emph{before} the correlation spike that accompanies each crisis, and sustains high readings during periods of structural fragility that conventional metrics classify as calm. The duality defect is a first-principles structural admissibility condition, requiring no training data and computable in milliseconds.

Authors (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.