Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Rocks, Pebbles and Sand: Modality-aware Scheduling for Multimodal Large Language Model Inference

Published 27 Mar 2026 in cs.DC and cs.AI | (2603.26498v1)

Abstract: Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) power platforms like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot, enabling richer interactions with text, images, and videos. These heterogeneous workloads introduce additional inference stages, such as vision preprocessing and encoding, that inflate latency and memory demand. Existing LLM serving systems, optimized for text-only workloads, fail under multimodality: large requests (e.g., videos) monopolize resources, causing severe head-of-line blocking and performance degradation. Our key insight is that multimodal requests differ by orders of magnitude in resource demands, which we capture through a simple abstraction: videos behave like rocks, images like pebbles, and text like sand. We design RPS-Serve, a modality-aware scheduler that lets sand flow quickly through pebbles and rocks, ensuring interactive responsiveness while avoiding starvation. RPS-Serve classifies requests, prioritizes them dynamically, and applies aging to avoid starvation. Evaluation across state-of-the-art MLLMs shows that RPS-Serve reduces, on average, time-to-first-token (TTFT) by 54% overall, and by 78.5% for latency-critical requests, compared to current systems. RPS-Serve delivers LLM-like responsiveness for MLLMs, with modality-aware scheduling and by making the most efficient use of the available resources.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.