Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Effects of the May 2024 Solar Storm on the Earth's Radiation Belts Observed by CALET on the International Space Station

Published 3 Feb 2026 in physics.space-ph | (2602.03990v1)

Abstract: In May 2024, extraordinary solar activity triggered a powerful solar storm, impacting Earth and producing the extreme geomagnetic storm of May 10-11, the most intense since 2003. This had significant effects on the magnetosphere, leading to the creation of a new long-lasting component of relativistic electrons and to flux changes in the South-Atlantic Anomaly. Here we present radiation-belt observations made by the Calorimetric Electron Telescope (CALET) on the International Space Station. Specifically, we took advantage of the count rates from three layers of the CALET charge detector and imaging calorimeter. We show that the new electron storage ring extended to energies in the multi-MeV range and down to L=2.2, well below the nominal slot-region barrier of L=2.8, and persisted for several months, depending on energy. The evolution of the new radiation-belt configuration over time was characterized by estimating the decay rates as a function of energy and L.

Summary

  • The paper documents the formation and persistence of a new relativistic electron storage ring in Earth's slot region after the May 2024 superstorm.
  • It employs CALET/ISS energy-resolved measurements with cross-calibration from GOES, EPT, and REPTile-2 to capture an order-of-magnitude increase in electron fluxes.
  • The study provides critical insights for refining space weather models and risk assessments for satellites by elucidating energy- and L-dependent electron decay trends.

Effects of the May 2024 Solar Storm on the Earth's Radiation Belts: Insights from CALET/ISS Observations

Introduction

The May 2024 solar storm, driven by the merger of NOAA active regions 13664 and 13668, represents one of the most intense geomagnetic disturbances in recent decades, with a minimum Dst of 412-412 nT and a planetary K-index (Kp) of 9. This superstorm provided a critical opportunity to study the ring current and relativistic electron dynamics in Earth's inner magnetosphere. Leveraging the long-term, high-energy monitoring capacity of the Calorimetric Electron Telescope (CALET) aboard the International Space Station, this study systematically characterizes the unprecedented formation and persistence of a new relativistic electron storage ring in the aftermath of the event (2602.03990).

Experimental Overview and Instrumentation

CALET, residing in low Earth orbit (LEO) onboard the ISS, is equipped with the charge detector (CHD) and imaging calorimeter (IMC), enabling energy-resolved measurements of electrons and protons above key thresholds (>1.5>1.5, >3.4>3.4, >8.2>8.2 MeV for electrons). Despite the integral nature and species non-discrimination in CALET's channels, contextual cross-calibration with GOES, REPTile-2 (CIRBE), and PROBA-V/EPT allowed robust association of count rate enhancements to relativistic electrons, specifically within the L=2.2L = 2.2--$3.2$ shell domain.

Radiation Belt Response to the May 2024 Geomagnetic Superstorm

The sequence of CME impacts, culminating in the May 10--11 interval, produced a severe erosion of the plasmasphere and significant dayside compression of the magnetopause, triggering deep transport of outer radiation belt electrons into classical slot regions. CALET detected an intense, narrow enhancement in >1.5>1.5~MeV and mult-MeV electron fluxes, representing an order-of-magnitude increase in slot region intensity, most pronounced for LL between 2.2 and 3.2 and persisting up to five months post-event, depending on energy. This phenomenon was reminiscent of the exceptional "storage ring" episode observed during the 2003 Halloween storm, but with significantly greater longevity.

Of particular note, multi-MeV electron fluxes extended well below the canonical slot region boundary at L=2.8L=2.8, approaching the stable inner belt. Observational concurrence by EPT and CIRBE/REPTile-2 confirmed the spatial and energetic characteristics and the protracted presence of this population.

Temporal Evolution and Decay Analysis

The study provided a detailed exponential characterization of the post-storm slot-region electron population decay, revealing complex energy- and LL-dependent trends in effective lifetime. After the storm and prior to the next major disturbance, lifetimes were as follows for L=2.8L=2.8--3.2: 41.3±4.241.3 \pm 4.2 days for >1.5>1.5~MeV, 25.4±2.525.4 \pm 2.5 days for >3.4>3.4~MeV, and 19.0±1.619.0 \pm 1.6 days for >8.2>8.2~MeV electrons. Lower LL exhibited longer decay times for higher energies, e.g., the >8.2>8.2~MeV electron population at L=2.3L=2.3 showed a fitted lifetime of \sim72 days.

Contrastingly, for L2.7L\gtrsim2.7, the >1.5>1.5~MeV electron lifetimes plateaued at \sim38--40 days, while the higher-energy populations demonstrated a minimum around L=3L=3. These detailed decay profiles support the coexistence of collisional losses dominating at lower LL and energy-dependent wave-particle (notably hiss and EMIC) interactions controlling higher LL electron lifetime dynamics.

Furthermore, the persistence of the slot region population was modulated by subsequent geomagnetic storms; major events (e.g., June 28, August 4/12, September 12/17) produced abrupt dropouts and recoveries, with lower LL shells exhibiting more gradual and less pronounced variability compared to the higher LL.

SAA Proton Dynamics

CALET also resolved notable changes in the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA), detecting morphology and intensity shifts—particularly on the eastern boundary—attributable to storm-induced deep SEP proton injection. These observations, corroborated by EPT and REPTile-2, highlight the coupled nature of electron and proton belt responses under extreme space weather conditions.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The extended durability of the relativistic electron storage ring challenges certain theoretical lifetimes derived from quasilinear diffusion models, which often predict shorter electron persistence, especially below L=3L=3. The observed energy and LL dependencies constrain diffusion coefficients, elucidate the operative balance between hiss/EMIC scattering and Coulombic interactions, and suggest potential gaps in current inner magnetospheric wave models. The contrast with historical events (2003, 1989, etc.) implies critical sensitivity to storm strength, plasmaspheric erosion, and subsequent wave environments.

From a practical perspective, the findings have significant implications for spacecraft mission risk assessment, since the previously quiescent slot region may become a high-radiation environment for extended periods after superstorms.

Outlook

Continued operation of CALET through at least 2030 ensures the potential for further capturing rare events and developing predictive models integrating microphysical (wave-particle/transport) and macrophysical (global convection, magnetopause dynamics) processes. Enhanced multi-point, multi-energy mapping remains essential for further constraining wave power distributions, cross-species precipitation rates, and finally, for improving inner zone and slot region energetic electron forecasts for space weather mitigation.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates, using CALET/ISS, that the May 2024 superstorm created an unprecedented, long-lived multi-MeV electron storage ring in the slot region (L=2.2L = 2.2--$3.2$), invalidating the classical notion of an impenetrable barrier below L2.8L\sim2.8 under extreme space weather. The persistence and decay of this population provide critical constraints on electron loss timescales, the operative role of hiss and EMIC waves, and the conditions leading to enhanced proton penetration into the SAA. These results necessitate both refinement of theoretical models and reassessment of radiation belt hazard protocols for LEO and MEO satellite operations (2602.03990).

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Explain it Like I'm 14

Overview

This paper explains what happened to Earth’s radiation belts during and after a huge solar storm on May 10–11, 2024. Using a space instrument called CALET on the International Space Station, the researchers saw a brand-new “ring” of very energetic electrons form much closer to Earth than usual. They watched how strong this ring was, how far it stretched, how long it lasted, and how later space-weather events changed it over the next several months.

What questions did the researchers ask?

  • Did the May 2024 superstorm push high‑energy electrons into the normally empty “slot” between Earth’s two radiation belts?
  • How far inward did these electrons go, and how energetic were they?
  • How long did these electrons stay trapped there (their “lifetimes”)?
  • Did the storm also change the South Atlantic Anomaly (a region where trapped protons make radiation stronger over the Atlantic)?
  • How did later storms in June–September affect this new electron population?

How did they study it? (Methods in everyday language)

CALET is a particle detector on the ISS. Think of it like a very fast, very sensitive counter that clicks when a particle passes through. It has several layers that are each good at noticing particles above certain energies. In this study, they used three layers that can detect:

  • electrons above about 1.5 MeV, 3.4 MeV, and 8.2 MeV (MeV is a unit of energy — higher MeV means a faster, more dangerous particle)
  • protons above higher thresholds (but these data can include both electrons and protons)

Because CALET’s count rates alone can’t perfectly tell electrons from protons, the team compared CALET’s measurements with other spacecraft data (like GOES satellites) and with where the ISS was over Earth’s magnetic field. That helped them decide when the signals were mostly electrons and when they were mostly protons.

They organized the data using “L‑shells,” which are like labels for magnetic distance from Earth. You can imagine Earth’s magnetic field as a stack of invisible hoops around the planet; each hoop has an L number (for example, L=2.2 is closer to Earth than L=3.0).

They also tracked how the counts changed over time and during later storms. To estimate how long the electrons stayed, they fit the decay of the counts to an exponential curve, similar to how a hot drink cools down fastest at first and then more slowly. This gave them “lifetimes” in days for different energies and L‑shells.

Here are a few simple definitions to make the terms clear:

  • Radiation belts: Two donut-shaped zones around Earth where charged particles (mostly electrons and protons) get trapped by Earth’s magnetic field.
  • Slot region: The gap between the inner and outer belts that usually has very few super‑energetic electrons.
  • L‑shell (L): A number that marks how far a magnetic field line is from Earth; smaller L is closer in.
  • Geomagnetic storm: A disturbance in Earth’s magnetic field caused by bursts of material and magnetic fields from the Sun.
  • SEP event: A burst of solar energetic particles (mostly protons) from the Sun.
  • South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA): An area over the South Atlantic where Earth’s magnetic field is weaker, so satellites get more radiation there.

What did they find, and why does it matter?

After the May 2024 superstorm, CALET saw a new, long‑lasting ring of very energetic electrons appear between L≈2.2 and L≈3.2 — this is well inside the usual “barrier” near L≈2.8 that normally stops the most energetic electrons from getting closer to Earth.

Key findings:

  • A new “storage ring” of relativistic (very high‑energy) electrons formed quickly after the storm, reaching energies above 8 MeV.
  • This ring lasted a long time:
    • Electrons above 8.2 MeV stayed for well over a month.
    • Electrons above 1.5 MeV lasted more than 5 months.
  • The electron signal peaked about 10 days after the storm, then slowly faded. Later storms in late June and August caused sudden drop‑outs (sharp decreases) and partial refilling afterward.
  • Estimated lifetimes (for L between 2.8 and 3.2) were about:
    • 41 days for >1.5 MeV
    • 25 days for >3.4 MeV
    • 19 days for >8.2 MeV
  • Lifetimes changed with location:
    • Closer to Earth (lower L), higher‑energy electrons tended to last longer.
    • Farther out (around L≈3), higher‑energy electrons tended to disappear faster.
    • This “flip” in behavior shows different physical processes dominate closer in versus farther out.
  • The South Atlantic Anomaly also changed shape and intensity. During the storm, weaker magnetic shielding let more solar protons get trapped deeper than usual, sharpening one side of the SAA. There was also a temporary “hole” in proton counts just outside the SAA that slowly refilled over months.

Why this matters:

  • It shows that during extreme storms, the usual inner barrier isn’t impenetrable — very energetic electrons can be pushed deep toward Earth and hang around for months.
  • Long‑lasting high‑energy electrons can increase radiation risks for satellites and astronauts in low Earth orbit.
  • The measured lifetimes help scientists figure out which processes remove electrons (for example, certain types of electromagnetic waves that knock electrons into the atmosphere), improving models and forecasts.

What are the broader implications?

  • Space weather forecasting: Knowing that superstorms can create long‑lived, deep electron rings helps predict when and where satellites may face extra radiation, guiding safe operations, shielding, and mission planning.
  • Better physics models: The way lifetimes change with energy and L suggests that different “loss” processes dominate in different regions (for example, “hiss” waves closer in and EMIC waves farther out). Models must include these processes correctly to forecast hazards.
  • Satellite and astronaut safety: Operators can plan maneuvers, harden electronics, or schedule sensitive tasks when radiation is lower. Astronaut missions can account for these longer‑lasting hazards after big storms.
  • Ongoing monitoring: CALET’s continuous measurements from the ISS (approved through 2030) offer a valuable way to watch radiation belt changes over both short bursts (during storms) and long periods (months), improving our understanding and preparedness.

In short, the May 2024 superstorm didn’t just cause a short‑term spike — it reshaped Earth’s radiation environment for months. This study shows where, how energetic, and how long those changes lasted, giving scientists and satellite operators a clearer picture of what to expect after extreme solar events.

Knowledge Gaps

Knowledge gaps, limitations, and open questions

Below is a concise list of what remains missing, uncertain, or unexplored in the study, framed to guide actionable follow-on research:

  • Particle identification ambiguity: CALET count rates cannot distinguish electrons from protons; quantitative bounds on proton contamination (especially near the SAA and during SEP intervals) are not provided. Develop species-separation strategies (e.g., event reconstruction, coincidence/anticoincidence logic, comparison with directional information, or joint inversion with partner instruments).
  • Lack of absolute fluxes and spectra: Results rely on integral threshold count rates rather than differential/omnidirectional electron fluxes. Derive calibrated energy spectra (e.g., 1–20+ MeV) and their temporal evolution to enable mechanistic inference and model-data comparison.
  • Integral-channel lifetime bias: Electron lifetimes are fit with single exponentials from integral channels (>1.5, >3.4, >8.2 MeV), which conflate energy-dependent decays and can yield two-stage behaviors. Perform deconvolution/forward-folding with instrument response and piecewise/multi-exponential or time-varying decay fits.
  • Missing pitch-angle distributions: No pitch-angle information is used to separate mirroring vs loss-cone populations or quantify anisotropy. Extract PADs (if possible from CALET geometry) or combine with complementary measurements to determine whether counts are dominated by quasi-trapped or precipitating electrons.
  • No MLT/local-time dependence: The analysis aggregates over magnetic local time; slot-filling, losses, and dropouts can be strongly MLT-dependent. Bin by MLT/sector to characterize dawn–dusk, day–night asymmetries and link to wave/chorus/EMIC occurrence.
  • L-shell mapping uncertainties: The magnetic field model used for McIlwain L during extreme storm conditions is not specified; storm-time mapping errors can be non-negligible. Quantify L-mapping uncertainty (e.g., using TS07D/Tsyganenko/SWMF) and propagate it into lifetime estimates.
  • ISS sampling biases: The 51.6° inclination and variable altitude impose uneven L/MLT coverage and atmospheric loss sensitivities. Correct for dwell time, acceptance, livetime, and geographic sampling to avoid bias in L-dependent rates and lifetimes.
  • Wave–particle interaction diagnostics absent: The roles of hiss, EMIC, chorus, lightning-generated whistlers, and VLF transmitters are hypothesized but not tested. Correlate electron decay/enhancement intervals with in situ or ground-based wave power and transmitter activity to attribute dominant loss processes.
  • Plasmasphere/plasmapause state unmeasured: Storage-ring formation is attributed to plasmasphere erosion, but plasmapause location/refill rates are not constrained. Incorporate plasmapause estimates from models/TEC/whistler inversion to verify timing and location relative to the observed ring.
  • Mechanistic attribution unresolved: Contributions from local acceleration (chorus), radial diffusion (D_LL), magnetopause shadowing, and outward transport are not quantified. Use physics-based Fokker–Planck (e.g., VERB/DREAM) modeling constrained by CALET and partner data to partition processes.
  • Unexplained energy-dependence crossover near L≈2.5: Lifetimes increase with energy at low L but decrease with energy at higher L; this transition is not quantitatively reproduced. Test whether hiss- vs EMIC-dominated scattering and Coulomb collisions can explain the crossover via targeted diffusion coefficient modeling.
  • Why 2024 persistence exceeded 2003: The longer-lived post-2024 storage ring vs the 2003 Halloween event is noted but not explained. Conduct a controlled comparison including wave climatology, plasmasphere refilling, storm duration, solar-cycle phase, and seed populations.
  • Upper-energy extent unknown: IMC4X (>8.2 MeV) gives no upper bound on ultrarelativistic electrons (>10–20 MeV). Leverage CALET TASC or other missions to map the high-energy tail and test the integrity of the L≈2.8 “barrier” at higher energies.
  • Temporal resolution limitations: Four-day rolling averaging obscures short-timescale dynamics (rapid injections, microbursts, fast dropouts). Reanalyze with higher cadence and event-based windows to resolve sub-day processes.
  • Incomplete uncertainty budget: Only fit-parameter errors are provided; systematic uncertainties from species mixing, energy response, threshold stability, dead time, L-mapping, dwell-time weighting, and background are not quantified. Build and report a full error budget.
  • SEP contamination handling: SEP intervals (e.g., May 11–12, June 8) likely affect count rates at high L; explicit subtraction or modeling of SEP contributions using rigidity cutoffs, anisotropy, and spectral fits is not performed.
  • Atmospheric coupling effects: At LEO, observed decay may be modulated by thermospheric density changes (storm-time heating) affecting loss cones. Quantify the influence of varying atmospheric density on measured decay rates.
  • Geographic/drift-shell characterization: The new band appears southeast of the SAA but its drift-shell geometry is not fully mapped. Recast results in AACGM/magnetic equatorial coordinates to separate geographic from magnetic effects.
  • SAA proton dynamics quantified incompletely: SAA sharpening and slot depletion are described qualitatively; energy-resolved proton spectra, spatial evolution, and decay times are not derived. Combine CALET with EPT/REPTile-2 and proton transport modeling to quantify trapped SEP proton behavior.
  • Cross-instrument calibration: Aside from qualitative consistency, no quantitative cross-calibration with REPTile-2/EPT is presented for flux levels, spectra, or lifetimes. Perform joint analysis to harmonize measurements and reduce instrument-specific biases.
  • Barrier recovery not tracked: The timing/mechanism of re-establishing the L≈2.8 “impenetrable barrier” is not determined. Monitor the slot’s recovery and potential hysteresis, and compare with wave/plasmasphere recovery.
  • Post-storm storm impacts unparsed: Multiple subsequent storms produced dropouts/enhancements, but their distinct mechanisms (e.g., shadowing vs scattering) are not disentangled. Conduct causal, event-by-event analyses with solar-wind/IMF drivers and wave observations.
  • Model–data assimilation opportunity: CALET constraints are not assimilated into radiation belt models to refine diffusion coefficients and empirical lifetimes. Implement assimilation to improve predictive capability for slot-region dynamics.

Practical Applications

Overview

This paper reports ISS/CALET observations of the May 10–11, 2024 superstorm that (1) injected a long-lived population of relativistic electrons deep into the radiation-belt slot region (L≈2.2–3.2), well below the nominal L≈2.8 “impenetrable barrier,” (2) quantified multi-MeV electron persistence with L- and energy-dependent lifetimes (≈19–72 days depending on energy/L), and (3) documented storm-driven changes to South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) proton fluxes and morphology. These findings and methods have immediate implications for satellite operations, space-weather nowcasting, risk/pricing, and standards, and they inform long-term modeling, instrumentation, and mitigation strategies.

Immediate Applications

The following applications can be deployed now using the published results and publicly available data products.

  • Stronger post-storm LEO radiation operations playbooks (Sector: aerospace/satellite operations, human spaceflight)
    • Action: Update post-G5 storm procedures to reflect months-long persistence of multi-MeV electrons at L≈2.2–3.2 and sharpened SAA edges (e.g., longer-duration safe modes, delayed instrument restarts, extended EVA blackout windows).
    • Tools/workflows: CALET count-rate feeds (DARTS/JAXA), SWPC/OMNI indices (Dst, Kp), mission planning scripts that re-compute L-shell and SAA masks daily.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: CALET integral channels infer but don’t separate e–/p+; use contextual GOES/REPTile-2/EPT to resolve species when needed; ISS latitude limit (±51.6°) bounds coverage.
  • Dynamic SAA geofencing and duty-cycling for LEO constellations (Sector: Earth observation, communications)
    • Action: Regenerate SAA polygons weekly after extreme storms to reflect the observed east-edge sharpening and slot-region proton depletion, adjusting instrument power, detector HV, and memory scrubbing schedules.
    • Tools/workflows: Automated SAA map updater that ingests CALET/EPT spatial counts, propagates to per-satellite attitude/orbit timelines.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: SAA morphology evolves over months; cross-calibration with PROBA-V/EPT improves proton/electron attribution.
  • Radiation hazard “Slot Region Alert” product (Sector: space weather services, satellite ops)
    • Action: Stand up an alert that flags L=2.2–3.2 as hazardous for multi-MeV electrons for weeks to months after G4–G5 storms, with L- and energy-specific decay timescales.
    • Tools/workflows: L-shell hazard index derived from CALET counts and fitted lifetimes (this paper), integrated into SWx portals (e.g., SWx TREC) and mission dashboards via an API.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Exponential decay fits are storm-phase dependent and bounded by subsequent storms; refresh upon new disturbances.
  • Post-storm anomaly forensics and triage (Sector: satellite operations, insurance/finance)
    • Action: Use the paper’s L- and energy-dependent lifetimes to attribute late-onset anomalies (weeks after storm) to persistent slot-region MeV electrons vs other causes.
    • Tools/workflows: Anomaly correlation engine that overlays event timelines with L-shell occupancy and CALET-derived hazard indices; insurer underwriting models parameterized by persistence.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Requires satellite ephemerides-to-L mapping and exposure modeling; integral channels imply energy bands, not spectra.
  • Rapid updates to radiation environment models used in design and ops (Sector: aerospace engineering, standards)
    • Action: Patch AE9/AP9/SPM user workflows to include a “post-superstorm slot-fill” option for L=2.2–3.2 using CALET persistence and dropout behavior (June 28, Aug 4/12 storms).
    • Tools/workflows: Model post-processing layer or plugin with CALET-derived lifetimes; design margin calculators for SEE/SEU rates over months-long windows.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Generalization from one extreme storm; validate against historical (e.g., 2003 Halloween) and concurrent (REPTile-2, EPT) datasets.
  • EVA and crew exposure scheduling on the ISS (Sector: human spaceflight)
    • Action: Extend EVA no-go periods and dosimetry vigilance following G4–G5 storms, reflecting longer-lived MeV electron enhancements in ISS-accessible L-shells.
    • Tools/workflows: EVA planner integrating L-shell hazard index and station ground track; crew dosimeter alerts tuned to extended decay.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: ISS altitude/inclination-bound exposure; electron/proton discrimination via contextual sensors.
  • Adaptive onboard fault-protection tuning (Sector: satellite avionics/software)
    • Action: Increase memory scrubbing frequency, error-correction thresholds, and watchdog sensitivity dynamically during identified high-risk L-shell passes post-storm.
    • Tools/workflows: Onboard or ground uplinked “radiation state” flags keyed to L-shell and time since storm recovery (Dst threshold).
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Requires real-time or predictive L-shell and hazard state; mission-specific margins.
  • Aviation space-weather advisories refinement for GLEs (Sector: aviation)
    • Action: While GLEs drove high-latitude dose alerts, include a note on prolonged satellite hazard that can impact aviation-dependent services (GNSS, comms), aiding contingency planning.
    • Tools/workflows: SWPC SIGMETs/AIREPs appended with satellite service risk context; airline ops playbooks for navigation redundancy.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Indirect aviation impact via space-based service reliability; not a direct cabin dose change from slot-region electrons.
  • Research-grade validation dataset for wave-particle loss processes (Sector: academia)
    • Action: Use the observed energy-dependent lifetime crossover (lifetimes ↑ with energy at L≈2.2, ↓ with energy at L≈3) to constrain hiss vs EMIC scattering rates in models.
    • Tools/workflows: Data assimilation into global radiation-belt models; side-by-side with Van Allen Probes legacy datasets; CALET DARTS archive.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Integral energy channels; requires forward-modeling to compare integrated vs differential lifetimes.
  • Mission concept trades for medium-inclination LEO (Sector: mission design)
    • Action: Re-evaluate detector survivability and maintenance windows for payloads repeatedly transiting L=2.2–3.2 (e.g., 50–60° inclinations), adding months-long post-storm hazard to ops concepts.
    • Tools/workflows: Exposure mapping across constellation shells; life-cycle SEE/TID budgets including persistent slot-fill episodes.
    • Assumptions/dependencies: Slot filling is episodic and storm-intensity dependent; risk-weighted across solar cycle.

Long-Term Applications

These opportunities require further research, scaling, or development before operational deployment.

  • Predictive, L- and energy-resolved slot-region electron persistence forecasting (Sector: space weather modeling)
    • Vision: A forecast that predicts whether, how deep, and how long L≈2–3 will be filled post-storm, using multi-mission data assimilation and physics-based wave-particle models.
    • Tools/products: Operational model coupling plasmasphere erosion, chorus/hiss/EMIC climatology, and radial diffusion; ML emulators trained on CALET/REPTile-2/EPT.
    • Dependencies: Expanded in situ measurements below L≈3 with spectral resolution; real-time plasmapause location.
  • Standards and certification updates for post-storm radiation exposure (Sector: policy/standards, aerospace)
    • Vision: Incorporate months-long, post-superstorm slot-region MeV electron environments into ECSS/NASA/ISO environment standards and SEE/TID qualification profiles.
    • Tools/products: New design environment annexes (“Extreme-slot-fill scenario”), test spectra and dwell-time profiles for component qualification.
    • Dependencies: Community consensus on representativeness across storms; differential flux reconstructions.
  • Automated SAA morphology nowcast/forecast service (Sector: space weather services, satellite ops)
    • Vision: A routinely updated SAA map with confidence bounds that reflects SEP-driven injections, storm-time erosion, and recovery timescales.
    • Tools/products: Data fusion of CALET, EPT, SAMPEX-heritage, and magnetic field models; API supplying polygons and risk levels to flight software.
    • Dependencies: Sustained multi-sensor coverage; improved proton/electron discrimination in LEO monitors.
  • Radiation-belt remediation concept maturation (Sector: space infrastructure resilience)
    • Vision: Evaluate targeted VLF transmitter campaigns to hasten post-storm slot-region electron loss, reducing months-long hazard to satellites.
    • Tools/products: Decision support that schedules transmitter operations based on predicted lifetimes and L-shell occupancy; on-orbit validation metrics.
    • Dependencies: Regulatory approvals, transmitter capabilities, quantified side effects on HF/VLF users and ionosphere.
  • Design and deployment of a dedicated L-shell 2–3 monitoring constellation (Sector: instrumentation, public–private partnerships)
    • Vision: Small-sat network in LEO with electron/proton spectrometers and wave sensors to monitor slot-region dynamics continuously at multiple MLTs.
    • Tools/products: Open data streams feeding operational models; cross-calibration with ISS/CALET and future sensors.
    • Dependencies: Funding, rideshare opportunities, sensor miniaturization, data latency constraints.
  • End-to-end satellite insurance risk models incorporating persistence (Sector: finance/insurance)
    • Vision: Pricing models that explicitly account for weeks-to-months elevated failure rates after extreme storms, conditioned on L-shell distributions and constellation geometry.
    • Tools/products: Stochastic exposure simulators using slot-fill lifetimes and dropout statistics; parameterization for portfolio-level risk.
    • Dependencies: Access to anomaly and exposure data; regulatory acceptance of model changes.
  • Artemis/Gateway transit and surface mission radiation margins (Sector: human exploration)
    • Vision: Use updated worst-case belt transit conditions (including deep slot fill) when planning timelines, shielding, and abort windows for lunar missions.
    • Tools/products: Trajectory planners that avoid peak post-storm persistence windows; dose allocation tools including electron contributions.
    • Dependencies: Translation of CALET integral rates to dose-equivalent models; validation across geometries.
  • Root-cause analytics for delayed-onset anomalies and aging (Sector: reliability engineering)
    • Vision: Forensic frameworks that tie long-tailed anomaly distributions to persistent radiation environments, separating wear-out from post-storm effects.
    • Tools/products: Bayesian causality tools ingesting L-shell exposure histories, CALET-based hazard indices, and onboard telemetry.
    • Dependencies: High-fidelity operations logs; operator consent to share data for model training.
  • Educational and training curricula for operators (Sector: workforce development)
    • Vision: Training modules on extreme-storm slot filling, electron lifetimes, and SAA evolution to improve operator decision-making.
    • Tools/products: Scenario-based simulators reflecting the May 2024 sequence (injection, decay, dropouts, re-enhancements).
    • Dependencies: Curated datasets and replay tools; collaboration with SWPC/CCMC for dissemination.
  • Enhanced GNSS and MEO resilience planning (Sector: navigation, PNT)
    • Vision: Though GNSS primarily sits at higher L, planning for rare low-L intrusion events informs redundancy and anomaly response across MEO assets that traverse L≈2–3.
    • Tools/products: L-shell-aware risk dashboards for MEO operators; firmware modes for heightened radiation.
    • Dependencies: Empirical evidence of intrusion frequency at MEO; cross-constellation coordination.

Notes on feasibility across applications:

  • Electron/proton discrimination: CALET’s integral channels require contextual sensors for species separation; future instruments should add spectral separation.
  • Generalization: The May 2024 superstorm was extreme; model updates should be validated across multiple events.
  • Coverage: ISS latitude and altitude limit sampling; multi-mission fusion reduces blind spots.
  • Uncertainty: Exponential decay fits can be multi-stage and storm-interrupted; operational products should expose uncertainty bands and refresh triggers.

Glossary

  • Active region (AR): A magnetically active area on the Sun, often producing flares and CMEs, cataloged by NOAA. "Early May 2024 featured extreme solar activity related to NOAA active regions (ARs) 13664 and 13668."
  • Bz (IMF Bz component): The north–south (z-axis) component of the interplanetary magnetic field in GSM coordinates, critical for geomagnetic coupling. "panel f) displays the IMF Bz component in GSM coordinates (black) along with the Dst index (red)."
  • CALET (Calorimetric Electron Telescope): A high-energy astroparticle instrument on the ISS used to monitor cosmic rays and the radiation environment. "CALET, a Japanese-US-Italy high-energy astrophysics instrument, was launched to the ISS in August 2015 (Torii S., 2016)."
  • CHDX: The X-layer of CALET’s charge detector with a threshold sensitive to >1.5 MeV electrons and >17 MeV protons. "The thresholds of the CHDX, CHDY, and IMC4X respectively are >1.5. MeV, >3.4. MeV, and >8.2. MeV for electrons, and >17. MeV, >37. MeV, and >52. MeV for protons."
  • CHDY: The Y-layer of CALET’s charge detector with a threshold sensitive to >3.4 MeV electrons and >37 MeV protons. "The thresholds of the CHDX, CHDY, and IMC4X respectively are >1.5. MeV, >3.4. MeV, and >8.2. MeV for electrons, and >17. MeV, >37. MeV, and >52. MeV for protons."
  • CME (Coronal mass ejection): A large ejection of plasma and magnetic field from the Sun that can drive geomagnetic storms. "several accompanied by Earth-directed coronal mass ejections (CMEs) based on the Space Weather Database Of Notifications, Knowledge, Information (DONKI)"
  • Coulomb collisions: Interactions between charged particles that cause scattering and energy loss, affecting electron lifetimes. "Electron lifetimes in this slot region are believed to be driven by losses due to wave-particle interactions as well as Coulomb collisions"
  • Dayside magnetosphere: The part of Earth’s magnetosphere facing the Sun, where solar wind impacts are first felt. "impacted the dayside magnetosphere late on May 10 triggering an extreme G5 geomagnetic storm"
  • Dst index: A global measure of geomagnetic storm intensity based on the ring current; more negative values indicate stronger storms. "Characterized by a planetary K-index (Kp) of 9 and a minimum disturbed storm-time (Dst) index of -412 nT"
  • Dynamic pressure (solar-wind dynamic pressure): The pressure exerted by the solar wind flow, which can compress Earth’s magnetosphere. "The extreme solar-wind dynamic pressure caused a strong compression and erosion of the geomagnetic field"
  • Electron storage ring: A confined band of enhanced relativistic electron population persisting in the radiation belts. "the formation of a highly-energetic electron 'storage ring' can be ascribed to the extreme erosion of the plasmasphere"
  • EMIC waves (Electromagnetic ion cyclotron waves): Low-frequency plasma waves that can scatter and precipitate energetic electrons and ions. "Hiss waves, electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves, VLF transmitters, and lightning-generated whistlers can all contribute to electron loss in this region"
  • EPT (Energetic Particle Telescope): An instrument measuring energetic particles; here on PROBA‑V used to monitor radiation belts. "as previously reported by missions such as PROBA-V/Energetic Particle Telescope (EPT; Pierrard et al., 2024)"
  • G5 geomagnetic storm: The most severe category in NOAA’s geomagnetic storm scale. "triggering an extreme G5 geomagnetic storm according to the NOAA's space-weather scale."
  • Geomagnetic shielding: The protection provided by Earth’s magnetic field against charged particle penetration. "resulted in a significantly-weaker geomagnetic shielding, allowing solar protons to penetrate deeper into the magnetosphere"
  • GLE (Ground-level enhancement): An event where solar energetic particles are strong enough to be detected by ground-based instruments. "it was classified as the 74th ground-level enhancement (GLE 74), the second of solar cycle 25."
  • GOES (Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite): A series of satellites monitoring space weather and energetic particles near Earth. "Panel a) is the 5-min resolution integral proton intensities measured by the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-18 (GOES- 18)"
  • GSM coordinates (Geocentric Solar Magnetospheric coordinates): A coordinate system used in space physics aligned with Earth’s magnetic field and the Sun–Earth line. "panel f) displays the IMF Bz component in GSM coordinates (black) along with the Dst index (red)."
  • ICME (Interplanetary CME): A CME that has propagated into interplanetary space, often as a coherent magnetic structure. "This resulted in a interplanetary CME (ICME) structure propagating to Earth"
  • IMC4X: The bottommost X-layer of CALET’s imaging calorimeter used here as a high-threshold integral channel. "Panels b), c) and d) display the 6-hour resolution count rates (color code) recorded by the CHDX, CHDY and IMC4X detectors as a function of L."
  • IMF (Interplanetary magnetic field): The magnetic field carried with the solar wind through the heliosphere. "panel e) shows the IMF magnitude (black) and the solar-wind speed (red)"
  • Impenetrable barrier: A region near L≈2.8 historically observed to block ultrarelativistic electron penetration. "the so-called impenetrable barrier of L=2.8 (Baker et al., 2014)."
  • Interplanetary shock: A fast, shock-like disturbance in the solar wind that can abruptly change magnetospheric conditions. "CALET CHD rates show a peak at L>4.5 associated with passage of an interplanetary shock"
  • ISS (International Space Station): A low-Earth orbit platform hosting instruments like CALET for continuous space environment monitoring. "CALET, a Japanese-US-Italy high-energy astrophysics instrument, was launched to the ISS in August 2015"
  • Kp index (planetary K-index): A global geomagnetic activity index based on mid-latitude magnetic field variations. "Characterized by a planetary K-index (Kp) of 9"
  • LASCO (Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph): A coronagraph on SOHO used to observe CMEs. "the Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph (LASCO) onboard the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) spacecraft"
  • LEO (low-Earth orbit): Orbits at altitudes of a few hundred kilometers, where ISS and CALET operate. "the radiation environment at low-Earth orbit (LEO)"
  • Lightning-generated whistlers: VLF electromagnetic waves from lightning that can scatter radiation-belt electrons. "Hiss waves, electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves, VLF transmitters, and lightning-generated whistlers can all contribute to electron loss in this region"
  • L-shell (McIlwain's L): A parameter labeling magnetic field lines (by equatorial crossing distance in Earth radii). "down to Mcllwain's L=2.2, well below the nominal slot-region barrier of L=2.8"
  • Magnetic curvature scattering: A particle loss mechanism where field-line curvature causes pitch-angle scattering, leading to precipitation. "this depletion was caused by rapid proton losses (e.g., magnetic curvature scattering) at the outer boundary of the SAA"
  • Magnetopause: The boundary between the solar wind and Earth’s magnetosphere. "pushing the magnetopause inside the geosynchronous orbit"
  • Magnetosphere: Earth’s magnetic environment shaped by the interaction with the solar wind. "This had significant effects on the magnetosphere"
  • Plasmasphere: A dense, cold plasma region co-rotating with Earth inside the magnetosphere. "the extreme erosion of the plasmasphere"
  • Plasmaspheric hiss: Broadband VLF noise in the plasmasphere that efficiently scatters lower-energy electrons. "Plasmaspheric hiss can then act to efficiently scatter relatively-low-energy (≤1. MeV) electrons into the atmosphere"
  • Quasi-trapped electrons: Electrons that are temporarily confined by Earth’s magnetic field but eventually precipitate. "quasi-trapped and precipitating electrons from the outer radiation belt"
  • REPTile-2: The Relativistic Electron and Proton Telescope integrated little experiment-2 instrument used to monitor radiation belts. "the Relativistic Electron and Proton Telescope integrated little experiment-2 (REPTile-2; Li et al., 2025)"
  • SAA (South Atlantic Anomaly): A region where Earth’s inner radiation belt dips closest to Earth, enhancing trapped particle fluxes. "flux changes in the South-Atlantic Anomaly"
  • SAMPEX: A satellite mission that measured energetic particles and radiation belts. "based on the 2-6. MeV measurements made by SAMPEX (Baker et al., 2004)."
  • SEP event (Solar energetic particle event): An episode of high-energy particle emission from the Sun, often associated with flares/CMEs. "A high-energy SEP event occurred on May 11"
  • Slot region: The low-intensity region between the inner and outer radiation belts. "Between the two is a slot region mostly devoid of relativistic (≥1. MeV) electrons."
  • SOHO (Solar and Heliospheric Observatory): A solar observatory spacecraft hosting instruments like LASCO for CME monitoring. "onboard the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) spacecraft"
  • Sudden storm commencement: The abrupt onset of a geomagnetic storm marked by a sharp rise in ground magnetic fields. "The sudden storm commencement on May 10 at 17:05UT was marked by a substantial increase in GOES >10MeV protons"
  • TASC (Total absorption calorimeter): CALET’s deep calorimeter used to fully absorb and measure high-energy particle energy. "and a total absorption calorimeter (TASC)."
  • VLF transmitters: Very-low-frequency radio transmitters whose waves can interact with and scatter radiation-belt electrons. "Hiss waves, electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) waves, VLF transmitters, and lightning-generated whistlers can all contribute to electron loss in this region"
  • Wave-particle interactions: Processes where plasma waves exchange energy and momentum with charged particles, altering their motion and lifetimes. "due to wave-particle interactions (e.g., Shprits et al., 2006; Thorne et al., 2013)"

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 6 tweets with 88 likes about this paper.