Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Higher-Order Knowledge Representations for Agentic Scientific Reasoning

Published 8 Jan 2026 in cs.AI, cond-mat.mtrl-sci, cs.CL, and cs.LG | (2601.04878v1)

Abstract: Scientific inquiry requires systems-level reasoning that integrates heterogeneous experimental data, cross-domain knowledge, and mechanistic evidence into coherent explanations. While LLMs offer inferential capabilities, they often depend on retrieval-augmented contexts that lack structural depth. Traditional Knowledge Graphs (KGs) attempt to bridge this gap, yet their pairwise constraints fail to capture the irreducible higher-order interactions that govern emergent physical behavior. To address this, we introduce a methodology for constructing hypergraph-based knowledge representations that faithfully encode multi-entity relationships. Applied to a corpus of ~1,100 manuscripts on biocomposite scaffolds, our framework constructs a global hypergraph of 161,172 nodes and 320,201 hyperedges, revealing a scale-free topology (power law exponent ~1.23) organized around highly connected conceptual hubs. This representation prevents the combinatorial explosion typical of pairwise expansions and explicitly preserves the co-occurrence context of scientific formulations. We further demonstrate that equipping agentic systems with hypergraph traversal tools, specifically using node-intersection constraints, enables them to bridge semantically distant concepts. By exploiting these higher-order pathways, the system successfully generates grounded mechanistic hypotheses for novel composite materials, such as linking cerium oxide to PCL scaffolds via chitosan intermediates. This work establishes a "teacherless" agentic reasoning system where hypergraph topology acts as a verifiable guardrail, accelerating scientific discovery by uncovering relationships obscured by traditional graph methods.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a hypergraph approach that captures multi-entity interactions to overcome the limits of traditional pairwise knowledge graphs.
  • A dual-pass strategy combined with embedding-based deduplication processes 1,100 manuscripts to produce a hypergraph with 161,172 nodes and 320,201 hyperedges.
  • The methodology empowers a multi-agent framework to generate mechanistic hypotheses, enhancing scientific reasoning in complex composite material studies.

Higher-Order Knowledge Representations for Agentic Scientific Reasoning

Abstract

The paper "Higher-Order Knowledge Representations for Agentic Scientific Reasoning" introduces a novel methodology for constructing hypergraph-based knowledge representations intended to advance agentic scientific reasoning. Traditional knowledge graphs typically rely on pairwise constraints, failing to encapsulate the complex higher-order interactions characteristic of emergent physical behavior. By employing hypergraphs, the authors aim to preserve multi-entity relationships, thereby overcoming the limitations of existing knowledge graph architectures. Specifically, the methodology has been applied to analyze a corpus of approximately 1,100 manuscripts on biocomposite scaffolds, resulting in a hypergraph consisting of 161,172 nodes and 320,201 hyperedges, exhibiting a scale-free topology organized around highly connected hubs.

Introduction

LLMs have shown remarkable proficiency in natural language processing and generation. However, the implicit encoding of knowledge in their parametric structure poses challenges for knowledge verification and updating. Retrieval-augmented generation methods only inject unstructured text, which lacks explicit relational semantics. Traditional knowledge graphs offer some structural semantics but fail to represent higher-order relationships essential for complex scientific reasoning. Figure 1

Figure 1: Comparison between traditional pairwise graph representations and hypergraph representations for higher-order relationships.

The proposed solution involves constructing hypergraph-based knowledge representations that capture multi-entity interactions more faithfully than standard pairwise graphs. This approach prevents combinatorial explosion typical of pairwise expansions and maintains the co-occurrence context of scientific formulations.

Methodology

Hypergraph Construction

The methodology involves preprocessing document corpus into manageable chunks, followed by extraction of multi-entity interactions using a dual-pass strategy. Each document yields a subgraph, featuring hyperedges that encapsulate n-ary relationships, which are subsequently integrated into a global hypergraph. The resultant hypergraph encompasses relationships that support the discovery of recurring motifs, communities, and mechanistic patterns directly encoded in the corpus. Figure 2

Figure 2: High-order multi-entity networks organized along two conceptual axes.

To address semantic variations across documents, embedding-based deduplication is employed. High-degree nodes are retained as canonical representations of concepts, ensuring central, well-established terms dominate the hypergraph structure.

Agentic Reasoning

A multi-agent framework is employed to conduct inference over the hypergraph. Agents collaborate by exploiting higher-order pathways to generate mechanistic hypotheses for novel composite materials. The GraphAgent identifies candidate paths for mechanistic chains, which are then refined into concrete hypotheses by specialized reasoning agents.

Results and Discussion

Structure of the Hypergraph

The hypergraph exhibits a scale-free topology, characterized by a small set of dominant conceptual hubs. The empirical node degree distribution indicates extreme hubs, confirming the presence of highly connected nodes shaping the corpus structure. Figure 3

Figure 3: Subgraphs of the Biocomposite Scaffold hypergraph generated with varying hyperedge counts, illustrating core-periphery structure.

In-depth analysis reveals substantial redundancy and overlap among hyperedges, underscoring the efficiency of hypergraph representation.

Practical Implications

The induced subhypergraphs from the complete hypergraph offer insights into how scientific knowledge is structurally organized. Multi-agent reasoning fosters the exploration of latent relationships that span broader scientific domains, enriching mechanistic conclusions derived from the hypergraph.

Speculative Future Developments

The methodology sets the stage for potential advancements in LLM integration with complex data structures. Anticipated implementations include enhanced data retrieval augmented by hypergraph contexts and improved multi-domain reasoning capability. Figure 4

Figure 4: Node degree statistics and power-law behavior in the scientific hypergraph.

Conclusion

This paper establishes hypergraphs as a superior representation model for encoding complex scientific relationships, transcending traditional binarized graphs. By leveraging hypergraph structures in agentic reasoning frameworks, the authors demonstrate an innovative approach to accelerating scientific discovery through robust, intricate reasoning mechanisms supported by higher-order knowledge representations.

The explored framework not only accommodates a large corpus efficiently but also opens pathways to integrate LLMs with hypergraph-based reasoning, presenting an avenue towards evolving AI systems endowed with robust structural semantics essential for advanced scientific inquiry.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

Explain it Like I'm 14

Simple Explanation of the Paper

What is this paper about?

This paper shows a new way for AI to “think” like a scientist by organizing knowledge as groups of things that go together, not just pairs. The authors use a structure called a “hypergraph” to help AI connect ideas across many research papers and come up with new, testable scientific ideas, especially in materials science.

What questions are the authors trying to answer?

The paper focuses on a few clear questions:

  • How can we represent scientific knowledge so it captures real “group” relationships (like several ingredients working together in one experiment), not just one-to-one links?
  • Can this representation help AI reason more reliably and avoid making things up?
  • Will this help AI generate useful, grounded scientific hypotheses (new ideas that could be tested in the lab)?

How did they do it? (Methods in everyday language)

Think of scientific knowledge like a big map of ideas. Most maps used today connect ideas two at a time (A–B, B–C). That’s called a graph. But science often happens in groups: a formula may involve three chemicals together; a paper may study five factors at once. If you break that into pairs, you lose the full picture.

  • Hypergraph: Instead of drawing only one-to-one connections (like handshakes), a hypergraph lets you draw a single “group link” that connects many items at once (like a group hug). One “hyperedge” can tie together several entities that belong together in the same statement or experiment.
  • Building the hypergraph: The authors collected about 1,100 research papers on biocomposite scaffolds (materials used to support tissue growth). An AI read the papers and pulled out multi-entity facts, such as “material X and material Y were used together to make scaffold Z for purpose P.” Each of these facts became one hyperedge that connects all involved items together.
  • Two-pass reading strategy: 1) First, the AI captured clear, grammatical facts straight from sentences (who did what with what). 2) Then, it carefully added implied facts that were hinted at (like turning “fabrication of X” into “fabricate(X)” or “X for Y” into “X is used for Y”), without being too loose.
  • Cleaning up names: Different papers use different names for the same thing (like “PLA” vs. “polylactic acid”). The team used a tool that measures how similar words are in meaning (embeddings) to merge synonyms, while keeping the most common term.
  • Multi-agent reasoning: Think of a team of AI helpers.
    • One “map-reader” agent can walk the hypergraph (the group-based map) to find paths that connect distant ideas.
    • Other “expert” agents focus on the science details, checking and improving suggestions.
    • Together, they propose and refine new material designs backed by evidence found in the hypergraph.
  • A key trick: node-intersection constraints. This is like finding students who are in both the “math club” and the “robotics club” at the same time. In the hypergraph, it means the AI looks for concepts that show up together with multiple targets, helping bridge distant topics in a grounded way.

What did they find, and why does it matter?

Here are the main results and why they’re important:

  • They built a very large hypergraph from the literature: about 161,000 nodes (things like materials, methods, purposes) and 320,000 hyperedges (multi-entity facts from the papers). This kept the original “who-appeared-with-whom” context from each paper, instead of breaking it into many pair links that can distort meaning.
  • The hypergraph had a “scale-free” pattern: a few big hubs (very common concepts) and many smaller ones. That’s like airline networks where a few airports have flights to many places. This structure helps the AI jump efficiently from known ideas to new ones.
  • It avoided the mess of pairwise graphs. If you turn every group into all possible pairs, you get way too many lines and lose the identity of the original group (like which exact paper or experiment tied them together). The hypergraph kept that context intact.
  • It improved reasoning. Using hypergraph paths and overlaps, the AI could discover new, plausible material combinations. For example, it linked cerium oxide to PCL (a polymer) using chitosan as a bridge—suggesting a concrete, testable materials recipe, with explanations grounded in the literature.
  • Built-in guardrails. Because every step runs along real group relationships pulled from papers, the AI’s ideas are easier to trace and verify. This reduces “hallucinations” (made-up facts).

Why is this important for science?

This approach helps AI act more like a careful scientist:

  • It sees group relationships as they truly appear in experiments and papers.
  • It can connect far-apart ideas through shared groups, revealing hidden links.
  • It speeds up hypothesis generation—creating new material designs that could be tried in the lab.
  • It’s “teacherless” in the sense that the structure of the hypergraph itself guides the AI’s reasoning, without needing constant human retraining or special tuning for each task.
  • It’s update-friendly: as new papers come out, you can add them to the hypergraph without retraining the AI model.

Bottom line

By switching from pairwise graphs to hypergraphs, the authors give AI a better map of scientific knowledge—one that respects how experiments and ideas actually come in groups. This helps AI explore more safely and creatively, generating realistic, testable scientific hypotheses faster, with clearer evidence trails.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 1 like about this paper.