Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 173 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 124 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 207 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 442 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

WithAnyone: Towards Controllable and ID Consistent Image Generation (2510.14975v1)

Published 16 Oct 2025 in cs.CV and cs.AI

Abstract: Identity-consistent generation has become an important focus in text-to-image research, with recent models achieving notable success in producing images aligned with a reference identity. Yet, the scarcity of large-scale paired datasets containing multiple images of the same individual forces most approaches to adopt reconstruction-based training. This reliance often leads to a failure mode we term copy-paste, where the model directly replicates the reference face rather than preserving identity across natural variations in pose, expression, or lighting. Such over-similarity undermines controllability and limits the expressive power of generation. To address these limitations, we (1) construct a large-scale paired dataset MultiID-2M, tailored for multi-person scenarios, providing diverse references for each identity; (2) introduce a benchmark that quantifies both copy-paste artifacts and the trade-off between identity fidelity and variation; and (3) propose a novel training paradigm with a contrastive identity loss that leverages paired data to balance fidelity with diversity. These contributions culminate in WithAnyone, a diffusion-based model that effectively mitigates copy-paste while preserving high identity similarity. Extensive qualitative and quantitative experiments demonstrate that WithAnyone significantly reduces copy-paste artifacts, improves controllability over pose and expression, and maintains strong perceptual quality. User studies further validate that our method achieves high identity fidelity while enabling expressive controllable generation.

Summary

  • The paper introduces WithAnyone, a diffusion-based model that overcomes copy‑paste artifacts using contrastive identity supervision and a large-scale paired dataset.
  • It presents MultiID-2M and MultiID-Bench, enabling robust training and evaluation that enhances identity fidelity while reducing unwanted replication of reference features.
  • The comprehensive training pipeline—from reconstruction pre-training to paired tuning—demonstrates improved controllability and consistent, high-quality image synthesis.

WithAnyone: Controllable and Identity-Consistent Image Generation

Introduction and Motivation

Identity-consistent image generation, particularly in text-to-image and reference-driven synthesis, has advanced rapidly, yet remains fundamentally constrained by the lack of large-scale, diverse, and paired datasets. Most prior approaches rely on reconstruction-based training with single reference images, which leads to the "copy-paste" artifact: models overfit to the reference, directly replicating facial features and suppressing natural variations in pose, expression, and appearance. This over-similarity undermines controllability and limits the expressive power of generative models, as illustrated by the observed decrease in face similarity due to natural variations (Figure 1). Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1: Natural variations in head pose, expression, and makeup can cause more face similarity decrease than expected; copying the reference image limits the model's ability to respond to prompts for expression and makeup adjustment.

MultiID-2M: Large-Scale Paired Multi-Person Dataset

To address the data bottleneck, the paper introduces MultiID-2M, a large-scale dataset comprising 500k group photos with 1–5 recognizable celebrities, each paired with hundreds of individual reference images capturing diverse expressions, poses, and viewpoints. The dataset construction pipeline involves: (1) collecting and clustering single-ID data, (2) targeted retrieval of multi-ID group photos, (3) identity assignment via ArcFace embedding matching, and (4) post-processing for quality control and stylization (Figure 2). Figure 2

Figure 2: Overview of WithAnyone. MultiID-2M is constructed through a four-step pipeline, and training proceeds in four stages from pre-training to quality tuning.

This dataset enables the development and evaluation of models capable of multi-identity generation and provides the foundation for the MultiID-Bench benchmark, which standardizes evaluation protocols for identity customization.

MultiID-Bench: Comprehensive Benchmark for Multi-Identity Generation

MultiID-Bench is designed to evaluate both identity fidelity and generation quality in multi-identity scenarios. Unlike prior works that report only reference similarity, MultiID-Bench introduces metrics that penalize excessive copying and reward faithful realization of the prompted scene. The primary metric is similarity to the ground-truth (GT) image, not the reference, and a novel copy-paste metric quantifies the degree to which the generated image is biased toward the reference versus the GT. This framework enables systematic assessment of the trade-off between identity fidelity and copy-paste artifacts.

WithAnyone: Model Architecture and Training Paradigm

WithAnyone is a diffusion-based model built on the FLUX architecture, designed for controllable, high-fidelity multi-identity generation. The architecture encodes each reference face using both a face-recognition network (ArcFace) and a general image encoder, yielding identity-discriminative and mid-level features. Face embeddings are injected via cross-attention, restricted to attend only to their corresponding face regions (Figure 3). Figure 3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Model Architecture. Reference images are encoded by both face-recognition and general image encoders, with cross-attention restricted to face regions.

Training Objectives

The training objective is a weighted sum of three losses:

  • Diffusion Loss: Standard flow-matching loss for denoising diffusion models.
  • Ground-Truth-Aligned ID Loss: Cosine distance between ArcFace embeddings of the generated and GT images, using GT landmarks for alignment. This enables supervision at all noise levels and provides more accurate identity measurement.
  • ID Contrastive Loss (InfoNCE): Pulls the generated image closer to its reference in embedding space while pushing it away from negatives (other identities), leveraging the large negative pool enabled by the dataset.

The overall loss is:

L=Ldiff+λIDLID+λCLLCL\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{diff}} + \lambda_{\text{ID}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{ID}} + \lambda_{\text{CL}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{CL}}

with λID\lambda_{\text{ID}} and λCL\lambda_{\text{CL}} set to 0.1.

Training Pipeline

Training proceeds in four phases:

  1. Reconstruction Pre-training (Fixed Prompt): Initialize the backbone using all available data with a dummy prompt.
  2. Reconstruction Pre-training (Full Captions): Align identity learning with text-conditioned generation.
  3. Paired Tuning: Replace 50% of samples with paired (reference, GT) instances, breaking the shortcut of direct duplication and compelling the model to rely on high-level identity embeddings.
  4. Quality Tuning: Fine-tune on a curated high-quality subset to enhance perceptual fidelity and style robustness.

Experimental Results

Quantitative Evaluation

WithAnyone is evaluated against state-of-the-art general customization and face customization models on MultiID-Bench. Most existing methods exhibit a clear trade-off: higher face similarity to the reference coincides with stronger copy-paste artifacts. WithAnyone breaks this trade-off, achieving the highest GT similarity while maintaining a markedly lower copy-paste score (Figure 4). Figure 4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Trade-off between face similarity and copy-paste. WithAnyone achieves high GT similarity with low copy-paste, deviating from the trade-off curve of other models.

On the single-person subset, WithAnyone achieves a Sim(GT) of 0.460 and a copy-paste score of 0.144, outperforming all baselines in identity fidelity while suppressing copy-paste. On the multi-person subset, WithAnyone maintains superior performance in both identity and generation quality metrics.

Qualitative Results

Qualitative comparisons demonstrate that WithAnyone generates flexible, controllable faces that faithfully preserve identity, while general customization models and VAE-based approaches either exhibit copy-paste artifacts or deviate from the target identity (Figure 5). Figure 5

Figure 5: Qualitative results of different generation methods. WithAnyone achieves both high identity fidelity and controllability.

Ablation Studies and User Studies

Ablation studies confirm the necessity of each component: paired-data fine-tuning reduces copy-paste without diminishing GT similarity; GT-aligned ID loss provides more accurate and informative gradients; extended negatives in InfoNCE accelerate convergence and improve ID similarity. User studies with 10 participants show that WithAnyone consistently achieves the highest average ranking across identity similarity, copy-paste, prompt adherence, and aesthetics (Figure 6). Figure 6

Figure 6: User paper results. Larger bubbles indicate higher ranking; WithAnyone consistently ranks highest across all criteria.

Implementation Considerations

  • Computational Requirements: Training WithAnyone requires 8 NVIDIA H100 GPUs, with a global batch size of 32. The full training pipeline spans approximately 100k steps.
  • Data Requirements: The effectiveness of the model is contingent on access to large-scale, paired multi-ID data. The MultiID-2M dataset is critical for both training and evaluation.
  • Deployment: The model architecture is compatible with standard diffusion backbones (e.g., DiT, FLUX) and can be integrated into existing pipelines for face customization, editing, and multi-identity generation.
  • Limitations: The model's performance may degrade for identities with insufficient reference diversity or in out-of-distribution scenarios. The reliance on ArcFace for identity supervision may introduce bias toward the embedding space.

Implications and Future Directions

WithAnyone demonstrates that the long-standing trade-off between identity fidelity and copy-paste artifacts is not fundamental, but rather a consequence of data and training limitations. By leveraging large-scale paired data and contrastive objectives, it is possible to achieve both high identity consistency and controllable variation. This has direct implications for applications in personalized content creation, entertainment, and digital avatars, where both fidelity and flexibility are required.

Future work may explore:

  • Extending the approach to video and 3D avatar generation.
  • Incorporating more robust and disentangled identity representations.
  • Reducing data requirements via semi-supervised or synthetic data augmentation.
  • Further improving controllability over fine-grained attributes (e.g., accessories, lighting) without sacrificing identity.

Conclusion

WithAnyone provides a principled solution to the copy-paste artifact in identity-consistent image generation by introducing a large-scale paired dataset, a comprehensive benchmark, and a novel training paradigm with contrastive identity supervision. Empirical results demonstrate that WithAnyone achieves state-of-the-art identity fidelity while enabling expressive, controllable generation, establishing a new standard for multi-identity image synthesis.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Explain it Like I'm 14

A simple explanation of “WithAnyone: Towards Controllable and ID Consistent Image Generation”

Overview

This paper is about teaching AI to create images of real people that look like them (keep their identity) while still letting the person change naturally—like turning their head, smiling, or being in different lighting. The authors build a new dataset and new training methods so the AI doesn’t just “copy-paste” the reference photo, but can generate varied, controllable, and realistic pictures of the same person or even groups of people.

Key questions the paper asks

  • Can we make an AI that keeps someone’s identity consistent across different poses, expressions, and scenes, not just a direct copy of the original photo?
  • How do we fairly measure identity accuracy without encouraging “copy-paste” behavior?
  • What kind of training data and training tricks help the AI balance “looking like the person” with “being flexible and controllable”?

How they approached it (in everyday terms)

To solve the problem, the authors did three main things:

  • Built a big dataset called MultiID-2M:
    • Imagine a giant photo album of group pictures of celebrities, plus hundreds of different reference photos for each person (smiling, different angles, different hair, different makeup).
    • This gives the AI many examples of how the same person can look naturally different from photo to photo.
  • Created a fair test called MultiID-Bench:
    • Instead of only measuring how similar the AI’s picture is to the single reference photo, they compare it to the actual scene it’s supposed to match (the “ground truth” image and prompt).
    • They add a “copy-paste” score to detect when the AI is just copying the reference face too closely, instead of making a fresh, natural image.
  • Trained a new model called WithAnyone using smarter rules:
    • The model is built on a strong image-generation backbone (FLUX) that turns random noise into a picture step by step (you can think of it like sculpting a face from static).
    • It uses “face embeddings” (like a compact fingerprint of a face) to understand identity.
    • It adds a contrastive identity loss: this is like teaching the AI to pull the generated face closer to the correct person and push it away from other people—using lots of “negative” examples, which are faces of different identities.
    • It uses “ground-truth–aligned” identity checks: when the model is learning, it uses landmarks (like eyes, nose, mouth positions) from the real target image to better judge whether the generated image matches the person, even while the image is still being formed.

Training happened in four gentle steps:

  1. Learn basics by reconstructing faces from simple prompts (like “two people”) to warm up the model.
  2. Keep reconstructing but now with full captions to tie identity to language and scenes.
  3. Use paired training: give the model one photo of a person as input and a different photo of the same person as the target. This breaks the “copy-paste” shortcut and forces the model to learn the true identity rather than copying pixels.
  4. Fine-tune on high-quality images to improve style, lighting, and overall look.

Technical terms explained simply:

  • Identity consistency: making the generated face clearly look like the same person across different situations.
  • Copy-paste artifact: when the AI basically traces the reference photo instead of creating a new, natural image of the same person.
  • Embedding: a compact number-based “summary” of a face; like a digital fingerprint that helps the AI compare identities.
  • Contrastive loss: a training rule that says “get closer to the correct person, farther from wrong ones.”
  • Diffusion/FLUX: a method that starts from noise and gradually shapes it into a realistic image.

Main findings and why they’re important

  • WithAnyone reduces “copy-paste” while keeping identity accuracy high:
    • In tests, other models often face a trade-off: to look more like the person, they copy the reference too closely. WithAnyone breaks that trade-off and stays both accurate and flexible.
  • Better control of pose and expression:
    • The model responds well to prompts like “smiling” or “looking left” without losing who the person is.
  • Works for multiple people in one image:
    • WithAnyone can keep the identities of multiple people consistent in the same picture (like group photos) while still allowing natural differences between them.
  • Strong scores in both numbers and user studies:
    • Metrics and human evaluations agree: the model looks good and preserves identity without obvious copying.

What this means going forward

  • More natural, customizable portraits:
    • Think of making a family photo or a movie poster where everyone looks like themselves, but you can choose poses, expressions, styles, and scenes.
  • Better benchmarks and data for the field:
    • MultiID-2M and MultiID-Bench give researchers fairer tests and richer data to improve identity-aware generation.
  • Safer, more controllable generation:
    • Reducing copy-paste lowers the risk of awkward or unrealistic results and supports responsible, high-quality use.
  • Broad applications but also responsibility:
    • Useful for creative industries, social media, and photo editing. At the same time, the authors’ focus on celebrities and standardized evaluation highlights the need for ethical, respectful use of identity-based AI.
Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Knowledge Gaps

Below is a concise list of the paper’s key knowledge gaps, limitations, and open questions that remain unresolved.

  • Copy-Paste metric validity and robustness:
    • The mathematical definition of M_CP (including the ε stabilization and normalization by θ_tr) lacks sensitivity analysis; how do different ε values or near-zero θ_tr cases affect the metric?
    • Correlation with human judgments was reported as “moderate” without effect sizes or formal validation across diverse scenarios; stronger psychometric validation is needed.
    • The metric is tied to ArcFace embeddings; does its performance hold under alternative face encoders (e.g., AdaFace, MagFace) or multi-encoder ensembles?
  • ArcFace-centric evaluation bias:
    • Identity similarity and losses rely heavily on ArcFace; the paper does not quantify how biases in ArcFace (race, age, gender, makeup, occlusion) propagate to training and evaluation.
    • No cross-demographic breakdowns of Sim(GT), CP, and blending are reported; subgroup fairness and performance stratification remain unexplored.
  • Ground-truth–aligned ID loss assumptions:
    • Using GT landmarks to align generated faces during training may bias the learned representation toward GT geometry; impact when GT landmarks are unavailable (real-world inference) is not examined.
    • The method’s behavior when GT and generated poses differ significantly (e.g., profile vs. frontal) is not analyzed; does the alignment introduce pose-dependent distortions?
  • Face detection and region-restricted attention:
    • Identity embeddings are restricted to attend only to detected face regions, but the effect of mis-detections, partial faces, extreme poses, heavy occlusions, masks, or profile views on identity fidelity is not quantified.
    • No ablation on different face detectors or segmentation strategies (quality thresholds, multi-face conflicts) is provided.
  • Dataset construction quality and label noise:
    • Identity assignment via ArcFace clustering and cosine threshold (0.4) lacks empirical estimates of false-match/false-miss rates and cluster purity; how noisy are the identity labels?
    • The paper claims “diverse nationalities and ethnicities,” but provides no distributional statistics or fairness audits across demographic groups.
  • Benchmark coverage and representativeness:
    • MultiID-Bench contains 435 cases with up to 4 identities; performance for larger groups (≥5), crowded, or highly occluded scenes is not evaluated despite MultiID-2M including such cases.
    • Prompts are derived from GT images; generalization to free-form, compositional, or ambiguous prompts is not assessed.
    • Reported anomalies for VLMs (prior knowledge about TV series) reveal potential contamination/overlap with foundation model training data; mitigation and decontamination strategies are not discussed.
  • Scalability and efficiency:
    • Extended negative pools (up to thousands per sample) can be memory- and compute-intensive; the paper does not report training/inference costs, throughput, or memory footprints.
    • No systematic sensitivity studies on loss weights (λ_ID, λ_CL), temperature τ, negative pool size, or hard-negative mining strategies are presented.
  • Controllability granularity:
    • While improved prompt-based control for pose and expression is claimed, the paper does not expose attribute-level controllers (e.g., explicit yaw/pitch/roll, smile intensity, gaze) or quantify control accuracy against target attributes.
    • Spatial control (placement of multiple identities via boxes/keypoints) is not formally supported or evaluated; current control is text-only.
  • Style and domain generalization:
    • Robustness across non-photorealistic styles (sketch, anime, oil painting), extreme lighting, low-resolution inputs, and heavy image degradations is not measured.
    • The impact of strong stylization on identity fidelity and copy-paste is not studied in a controlled manner.
  • Generalization beyond celebrities:
    • MultiID-2M focuses on celebrities; generalization to ordinary individuals (no public image banks, fewer references per identity) and domain shift to non-celebrity photos remains an open question.
  • Multi-ID composition and interactions:
    • Identity blending and co-occurrence metrics are reported, but compositional correctness (relative positions, occlusions, gaze interactions, body overlaps) is not rigorously evaluated.
    • Failure cases for multi-person arrangement (identity swaps, duplicated faces, incorrect pairing of references to generated faces) are not systematically analyzed.
  • Evaluation protocol dependencies:
    • Rankings of CP are conditioned on Sim(GT) thresholds (e.g., >0.35 or >0.40); the sensitivity of conclusions to these thresholds is not explored.
    • The paper mixes closed-source baselines and heterogeneous backbones (FLUX, VAE, DiT) without compute budget normalization; fairness of comparisons is unclear.
  • User paper limitations:
    • Only 10 participants evaluated 230 groups; statistical power, inter-rater reliability, and detailed effect sizes are not reported.
    • No blinded or counterbalanced protocol details; potential anchoring or model-recognition biases remain.
  • Safety, ethics, and legal considerations:
    • The dataset uses celebrity imagery scraped from the web; consent, licensing status, and take-down policies are not described.
    • Risks of impersonation, deepfake misuse, and identity harm are not addressed; no proposed safeguards (watermarking, usage policies, detection tools) accompany model/dataset release.
  • Reproducibility details:
    • Training pipeline hyperparameters (learning rates, optimizer configs, augmentation policies), exact negative sampling procedures, and stylization recipe are only partially described; full reproducibility is uncertain.
    • No code/eval artifacts for computing CP, blending, and identity metrics across alternative encoders are documented for independent verification.
  • Extensions and broader applicability:
    • Video personalization (temporal coherence, identity drift), cross-modal inputs (audio, multi-view), and 3D-aware identity control are not explored.
    • Extension to non-human “identities” (e.g., pets, characters) and cross-species identity preservation is not examined.
  • Open methodological questions:
    • Can copy-paste be mitigated further via 3D face priors, disentangled latent controls, or pose/expression conditional diffusion without sacrificing Sim(GT)?
    • What are the theoretical limits of balancing fidelity and variation under different identity encoders and training objectives?
    • How does the approach perform under limited reference images per identity (e.g., 1–5), and what are the minimal data requirements to avoid copy-paste?
Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Practical Applications

Immediate Applications

The following bullet points summarize concrete use cases that can be deployed now, drawing on the paper’s dataset (MultiID-2M), benchmark (MultiID-Bench), training paradigm (paired tuning), losses (GT-aligned ID loss, ID contrastive loss with extended negatives), and copy-paste metric.

  • Identity-consistent creative production for ads, film, and gaming
    • Sectors: media/entertainment, advertising, game art
    • What: Generate controllable portraits and multi-person scenes of known talent (actors, athletes, influencers) with reliable identity consistency and natural variation in pose/expression/lighting, avoiding copy-paste artifacts.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: “WithAnyone for Adobe/Blender” plugins; studio asset pipelines that maintain a reference vault; promptable pose/expression control with MultiID-Bench-based QA gates.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Legal consent and licensing for identity use; sufficient reference images per identity; GPU inference capacity; demographic robustness of ArcFace-based pipelines.
  • Social photo apps and editors for group compositing and retouching
    • Sectors: consumer software, social platforms
    • What: Insert or adjust individuals in group photos while preserving identity and enabling natural facial edits (smile, gaze, pose), with lower risk of obvious cloning artifacts.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Mobile editor feature “Add friend to photo”; region-aware face conditioning; Copy-Paste risk scoring to discourage trivial cloning in UX.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: User-provided reference faces; reliable face detection/landmarks in varied lighting; moderation for impersonation abuse.
  • Brand ambassador consistency across marketing assets
    • Sectors: advertising, CRM, retail
    • What: Produce entire campaign sets with consistent brand ambassadors while varying style, setting, and expression for A/B tests.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Creative asset generation pipelines with MultiID-Bench regression tests; dashboards tracking Sim(GT) vs Copy-Paste scores.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Reference library management; QA processes; alignment of prompts and campaign briefs; ethics/legal compliance.
  • E-commerce product imagery and virtual try-on with stable models
    • Sectors: retail/e-commerce
    • What: Use identity-consistent models to present apparel/beauty products across diverse poses and expressions, improving catalog coherence.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Batch generation tools that pin model identity while prompting pose/expression; benchmark-in-the-loop QA to detect identity drift or copying.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Extension beyond celebrity references; domain adaptation to product contexts; model governance to prevent deceptive imagery.
  • Event photography and portrait studios: multi-shot completion and compositing
    • Sectors: professional photography
    • What: Generate missing shots or better group compositions that preserve each attendee’s identity with controllable expressions and poses.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Studio software integrating WithAnyone; per-attendee reference capture; copy-paste artifact checks before delivery.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Consent; reliable identity matching across varied angles; data management for references.
  • Copy-Paste Risk Score for content quality assurance
    • Sectors: software, content moderation, creative ops
    • What: Use the paper’s Copy-Paste metric to flag overly cloned outputs and enforce natural variation targets in generation workflows.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: “Copy-Paste score” API integrated into CI/CD for gen features; prompt-checkers that recommend pose/expression diversification.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Availability of a target scene or proxy references; tuning threshold per use case; potential domain gaps if GT is unavailable.
  • Benchmark-as-a-Service for multi-identity generation
    • Sectors: software, ML platforms, academia
    • What: Standardize evaluation of multi-ID generation with MultiID-Bench, reporting Sim(GT), Sim(Ref), copy-paste, blending, CLIP metrics, and aesthetics.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Hosted evaluation; leaderboards; reproducible splits; automated reports for model releases.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Agreement on metric definitions; dataset licensing; periodic updates to cover long-tail identities.
  • Training recipe adoption: paired tuning and extended negatives
    • Sectors: ML research & product teams, foundation model vendors
    • What: Integrate the paper’s four-phase training and losses to reduce copy-paste while preserving fidelity for identity-sensitive tasks.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Open-source training scripts; reference bank construction via clustering; extended negative pools from curated ID-labeled datasets.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Large-scale paired data; compute budgets; careful hyperparameter tuning (temperatures, weights).
  • Synthetic augmentation for face recognition robustness
    • Sectors: biometrics, security
    • What: Generate controlled variations (pose, lighting, expression) for identities to stress-test and improve recognition systems.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Data augmentation pipelines tied to Sim(GT) and blending metrics; balanced sampling to mitigate demographic bias.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Compliance with privacy and biometric regulations; careful evaluation to avoid overfitting to synthetic distributions.
  • Reference vault management and curation
    • Sectors: media asset management, creative ops
    • What: Adopt the paper’s clustering/cleaning pipeline to build high-quality identity reference banks for studios/agencies.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: ArcFace-based clustering, DBSCAN-style de-duplication; OCR/logo removal; LLM captions for metadata.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Stable face embedding performance across demographics; robust face detection; licensed sources.

Long-Term Applications

These use cases require further research, scaling, or development—especially extensions to video, real-time systems, and broader domains beyond celebrity faces.

  • Identity-consistent multi-character video generation and editing
    • Sectors: film/TV, streaming, VFX
    • What: Extend WithAnyone to temporally consistent video for de-aging, continuity across shots, and controllable expressions over time.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Video DiT/rectified-flow backbones; temporal contrastive losses; frame-level copy-paste monitoring.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Video datasets with paired identity references; temporal alignment methods; watermarking/provenance tooling.
  • Real-time telepresence and VR avatars
    • Sectors: communications, XR
    • What: Live identity-preserving avatars that faithfully reflect user expressions and poses without rigid copying artifacts.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Low-latency inference stacks; face-region attention; driver signals from webcams or sensors; safety filters.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Efficient on-device models; robust tracking; privacy-preserving pipelines.
  • Clinical and aesthetic planning tools (face procedures)
    • Sectors: healthcare
    • What: Identity-consistent simulations of likely outcomes (e.g., dental/orthognathic/cosmetic) under diverse poses/lighting.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Secure clinical UIs; physician-controlled prompts; audit trails; patient consent management.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Medical validation; bias/fairness assessments; strict regulatory compliance and disclaimers.
  • Policy toolkits for identity rights and deepfake governance
    • Sectors: policy/regulation, platform trust & safety
    • What: Use copy-paste and blending metrics to define permissible similarity ranges, detect near-clones of public figures, and enforce platform rules.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: “Similarity thresholding” standards; API integrations for takedown or review queues; provenance labels.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Legal adoption; robust reference databases; careful calibration to balance satire/fair use.
  • Enterprise-grade generative compliance and model cards
    • Sectors: software governance, enterprise AI
    • What: Incorporate MultiID-Bench metrics into model documentation and release gates to demonstrate controlled identity fidelity without cloning.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Compliance dashboards; build-time tests; lineage logs; risk statements linked to metrics.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Organizational buy-in; standardized reporting; periodic auditing.
  • Cross-domain multi-entity generation (beyond faces)
    • Sectors: robotics (parts ID), ecology (species), industrial inspection
    • What: Adapt the paired-data construction and contrastive negative pooling to objects, animals, and parts that require consistent identity across variations.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Domain-specific detectors/embedders; curated paired datasets; sector-specific evaluation protocols.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Reliable “identity” embeddings per domain; labeled references; new benchmarks.
  • Personalized assistants with consistent visual identity across apps
    • Sectors: consumer software, productivity
    • What: Maintain a user’s avatar identity consistently across chat, docs, meetings, and social apps, with controllable expressions/styles.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Cross-app identity tokens; pose/expression APIs; privacy-preserving storage of reference vaults.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Interoperability standards; consent and portability; device-local generation.
  • Deepfake forensics and training datasets
    • Sectors: security, forensics
    • What: Create labeled sets of “copy-paste” vs “controlled variation” deepfakes to train detectors; use metrics as features.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Synthetic data generation pipelines; feature engineering around angular distances; forensic benchmarks.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Access to high-quality references; legal permissions; continual updates to counter adversarial advances.
  • On-device identity customization for mobile and edge
    • Sectors: consumer hardware, embedded systems
    • What: Compress and distill identity customization models for phones, AR glasses, and cameras while preserving controllability.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Quantization/distillation; edge inference runtimes; incremental reference-bank updates.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Efficient DiT variants; thermal/power constraints; secure storage of identity data.
  • Rights-managed creative platforms with audit and watermarking
    • Sectors: creative SaaS, IP management
    • What: Platforms that track identity references, verify usage rights, watermark outputs, and audit copy-paste risk across projects.
    • Tools/Products/Workflows: Asset rights registries; provenance frameworks; user education about ethical generation.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Industry standards for watermarking and provenance; integration with legal/licensing systems.

Notes on Assumptions and Dependencies (Cross-cutting)

  • Identity references: Many applications require multiple high-quality, diverse references per identity; systems should manage a “reference vault” and consent.
  • Embeddings and detection: ArcFace/RetinaFace and landmark alignment underpin key losses/metrics; demographic bias and edge cases must be monitored.
  • Benchmarks and metrics: MultiID-Bench presumes access to GT or well-specified prompts; in real-world moderation, approximate targets or multi-reference distributions may be needed.
  • Compute and scaling: Paired training with extended negative pools is compute-heavy; deployment may need distillation and edge optimization.
  • Legal/ethical constraints: Identity use, deepfake risks, and impersonation require policy guardrails, watermarking, and user education.
  • Generalization: The dataset is celebrity-heavy; domain adaptation to non-celebrity or enterprise contexts may require additional curation and consent.
Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Glossary

  • Angular distance: The angle-based distance between two embeddings on the unit sphere used to compare identities. "We define the angular distance as θab=arccos(Sim(a,b))\theta_{ab} = \arccos(\mathrm{Sim}(a,b)) (geodesic distance on the unit sphere)."
  • ArcFace: A face recognition model that produces identity-discriminative embeddings for faces. "ArcFace embedding requires landmark detection and alignment,"
  • CLIP I/T: CLIP-based image/text similarity metrics used to quantify prompt fidelity in generation. "We additionally report identity blending, prompt fidelity (CLIP I/T), and aesthetics;"
  • Contrastive identity loss: A loss that pulls generated face embeddings toward the correct identity while pushing away other identities. "we introduce an ID contrastive loss that explicitly pulls the generated image closer to its reference images in the face embedding space while pushing it away from other identities."
  • Copy-Paste artifact: A failure mode where the model replicates the reference image instead of preserving identity under variations. "We term this failure mode the copy-paste artifact: rather than synthesizing an identity in a flexible, controllable manner, the model effectively copies the reference image into the output"
  • Copy-Paste metric: A metric that measures the bias of a generated image toward the reference versus the ground truth. "The Copy-Paste metric is given by"
  • Cosine distance: A measure of dissimilarity computed as one minus cosine similarity between embeddings. "We minimize the cosine distance between GT-aligned ArcFace embeddings of the generated and ground-truth (GT) faces:"
  • Cosine similarity: The normalized dot product used to compare face embeddings and assign identities. "assign identities by matching ArcFace embeddings to single-ID cluster centers using cosine similarity (threshold 0.4)"
  • DiT-style backbone: Diffusion Transformer-based architectures used as the generative model backbone. "With the rise of DiT‑style backbones~\citep{peebles2023scalable,esser2024scaling,flux2024} (e.g., SD3, FLUX), progress in ID preservation like PuLID~\citep{guo2024pulid}, also attracts great attention."
  • Diffusion loss: The training objective for diffusion/rectified-flow models that regresses velocity between noise and data. "Diffusion Loss. We adopt the mini-batch empirical flow-matching loss."
  • Flow-matching loss: An empirical rectified-flow objective that trains the model to predict the velocity from noise to data. "We adopt the mini-batch empirical flow-matching loss."
  • FLUX: A diffusion-transformer architecture that serves as the backbone for the proposed model. "WithAnyone, a novel identity customization model built on the FLUX~\citep{flux2024} architecture"
  • Geodesic distance: The shortest-path distance on the unit sphere used to interpret angular distances between embeddings. "(geodesic distance on the unit sphere)"
  • GT-aligned ID loss: An identity loss computed by aligning generated faces with ground-truth landmarks to avoid noisy detection. "Ground-truth–Aligned ID Loss."
  • Ground-truth (GT): The target reference image or identity used to evaluate fidelity in benchmarks. "Let r,t,g\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{t}, \mathbf{g} denote the face embeddings of the reference identity, the target (ground-truth), and the generated image, respectively."
  • Identity blending: A metric capturing unintended mixing of identities in multi-person generation. "We additionally report identity blending, prompt fidelity (CLIP I/T), and aesthetics;"
  • Identity customization: The task of conditioning image generation to preserve specific identities. "WithAnyone: A novel ID customization model built on FLUX that achieves state-of-the-art performance, generating high-fidelity multi-identity images while mitigating copy-paste artifacts and enhancing visual quality."
  • Identity fidelity: The degree to which a generated image matches the target identity rather than simply copying the reference. "Evaluation considers both identity fidelity and generation quality."
  • InfoNCE: A contrastive learning objective used to separate positive identity pairs from negatives via a temperature-scaled softmax. "The loss follows the InfoNCE~\citep{oord2018representation} formulation:"
  • Negative pool (extended negatives): A large set of non-matching identity embeddings used to strengthen contrastive training. "The labeled identities and their reference images enable the construction of an extended negative pool (images of different identities), which provides stronger discrimination signals during optimization."
  • Prompt fidelity: How well the generated image adheres to the text prompt, often measured with CLIP metrics. "We additionally report identity blending, prompt fidelity (CLIP I/T), and aesthetics;"
  • RetinaFace: A face detection model used to obtain landmarks for alignment before embedding extraction. "the coupled detection model as g()g(\cdot) (RetinaFace~\citep{Deng2020retinaface}),"
  • UNet: A convolutional encoder–decoder architecture historically used in diffusion models for image synthesis. "Many methods in the UNet/Stable Diffusion era inject learned embeddings (e.g., CLIP or ArcFace) via cross‑attention or adapters"
  • VAE-derived face embeddings: Identity features obtained by encoding faces with a variational autoencoder, often prone to low-level copying. "use VAE‑derived face embeddings concatenated with model inputs, which can produce pixel‑level copy‑paste artifacts and reduce controllability."
  • VLMs (Vision-LLMs): Multimodal models that jointly process images and text but may underperform on identity-sensitive tasks. "However, VLMs~\citep{Qwen2.5-VL,openai2025gpt4o} exhibit limited ability to distinguish individual identities and instead emphasize non-identity attributes such as pose, expression, or background."
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 11 tweets and received 161 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper:

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com