Exponential Lower Bounds on the Size of ResLin Proofs of Nearly Quadratic Depth
Abstract: Itsykson and Sokolov identified resolution over parities, denoted by $\text{Res}(\oplus)$, as a natural and simple fragment of $\text{AC}0[2]$-Frege for which no super-polynomial lower bounds on size of proofs are known. Building on a recent line of work, Efremenko and Itsykson proved lower bounds of the form $\text{exp}(N{\Omega(1)})$, on the size of $\text{Res}(\oplus)$ proofs whose depth is upper bounded by $O(N\log N)$, where $N$ is the number of variables of the unsatisfiable CNF formula. The hard formula they used was Tseitin on an appropriately expanding graph, lifted by a $2$-stifling gadget. They posed the natural problem of proving super-polynomial lower bounds on the size of proofs that are $\Omega(N{1+\epsilon})$ deep, for any constant $\epsilon > 0$. We provide a significant improvement by proving a lower bound on size of the form $\text{exp}(\tilde{\Omega}(N{\epsilon}))$, as long as the depth of the $\text{Res}(\oplus)$ proofs are $O(N{2-\epsilon})$, for every $\epsilon > 0$. Our hard formula is again Tseitin on an expander graph, albeit lifted with a different type of gadget. Our gadget needs to have small correlation with all parities. An important ingredient in our work is to show that arbitrary distributions \emph{lifted} with such gadgets fool \emph{safe} affine spaces, an idea which originates in the earlier work of Bhattacharya, Chattopadhyay and Dvorak.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.