Is the hyperscaling relation violated below the upper critical dimension in some particular cases? (2507.02159v1)

Abstract: In this review, we show our results with new interpretation on the critical exponents of thin films obtained by high-performance multi-histogram Monte Carlo simulations. The film thickness $N_z$ consists of a few layers up to a dozen of layers in the $z$ direction. The free boundary condition is applied in this direction while in the $xy$ plane periodic boundary conditions are used. Large $xy$ plane sizes are used for finite-size scaling. The Ising model is studied with nearest-neighbor (NN) interaction. When $N_z=1$, namely the two-dimensional (2D) system, we find the critical exponents given by the renormalization group. While, for $N_z>1$, the critical exponents calculated with the high-precision multi-histogram technique show that they deviate slightly but systematically from the 2D values. If we use these values of critical exponents in the hyperscaling relation with $d=2$, then the hyperscaling relation is violated. However, if we use the hyperscaling relation and the critical exponents obtained for $N_z>1$ to calculate the dimension of the system, we find the system dimension slightly larger than 2. This can be viewed as an "effective" dimension. More discussion is given in the paper. We also show the cross-over between the first- and second-order transition while varying the film thickness in an antiferromagnetic FCC Ising frustrated thin film. In addition, we will show evidence that when a 2D system has two order parameters of different symmetries with a single transition, the critical exponents are new, suggesting a universality class of coupled two-symmetry breakings. In this case, the 2D hyperscaling does not hold. Another case is the 3D Ising model coupled to the lattice vibration: the critical exponents deviate from the 3D Ising ones, the results suggest the violation of the hyperscaling.