Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 60 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 40 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 120 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 211 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 416 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Neural Network Potential with Multi-Resolution Approach Enables Accurate Prediction of Reaction Free Energies in Solution (2411.19728v1)

Published 29 Nov 2024 in physics.chem-ph

Abstract: We present design and implementation of a novel neural network potential (NNP) and its combination with an electrostatic embedding scheme, commonly used within the context of hybrid quantum-mechanical/molecular-mechanical (QM/MM) simulations. Substitution of a computationally expensive QM Hamiltonian by a NNP with the same accuracy largely reduces the computational cost and enables efficient sampling in prospective MD simulations, the main limitation faced by traditional QM/MM set-ups. The model relies on the recently introduced anisotropic message passing (AMP) formalism to compute atomic interactions and encode symmetries found in QM systems. AMP is shown to be highly efficient in terms of both data and computational costs, and can be readily scaled to sample systems involving more than 350 solute and 40'000 solvent atoms for hundreds of nanoseconds using umbrella sampling. The performance and broad applicability of our approach are showcased by calculating the free-energy surface of alanine dipeptide, the preferred ligation states of nickel phosphine complexes, and dissociation free energies of charged pyridine and quinoline dimers. Results with this ML/MM approach show excellent agreement with experimental data. In contrast, free energies calculated with static high-level QM calculations paired with implicit solvent models or QM/MM MD simulations using cheaper semi-empirical methods show up to ten times higher deviation from the experimental ground truth and sometimes even fail to reproduce qualitative trends.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 3 likes.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube