Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
116 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
24 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
3 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
35 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The thermodynamic profile of AdS black holes in Lorentz-violating Bumblebee and Kalb-Ramond gravity (2411.06188v2)

Published 9 Nov 2024 in gr-qc

Abstract: Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) is a topic of significant interest in quantum gravity and in extensions of the Standard Model of particle physics. Recently, new classes of black hole solutions have been proposed, involving vector fields and rank-two antisymmetric tensor fields that acquire nontrivial vacuum expectation values, resulting in the Bumblebee and Kalb-Ramond (KR) gravity models, respectively. These models exhibit novel geometric structures and differ in notable ways from standard Einstein gravity. In this study, we examine neutral anti-de Sitter (AdS) black holes within the context of LIV backgrounds, focusing on their thermodynamic properties through two distinct approaches. The first approach utilizes the free energy landscape framework, revealing substantial modifications to the conventional Hawking-Page phase transition. Specifically, LIV effects can alter the stability regimes of black holes and thermal AdS phases, potentially leading to overlapping thermodynamic regimes that would otherwise remain distinct. The second approach involves thermodynamic Ruppeiner geometry, which provides a window into the microstructure of black holes via a well-defined scalar curvature. In general, LIV effects are negligible for larger black holes, which behave like an ideal gas with no significant interactions among their constituents. However, at shorter length scales, the presence of LIV can induce multiple stable and unstable phase transitions, depending on the specific gravity model and the magnitude of LIV effects considered. While Bumblebee and Kalb-Ramond gravity share several similarities, we identify distinctive signatures arising from their underlying physical mechanisms. These differences may provide key observational and theoretical constraints for testing LIV effects in black hole physics.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)