Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Exponentially Consistent Statistical Classification of Continuous Sequences with Distribution Uncertainty

Published 29 Oct 2024 in stat.ML, cs.LG, and eess.SP | (2410.21799v1)

Abstract: In multiple classification, one aims to determine whether a testing sequence is generated from the same distribution as one of the M training sequences or not. Unlike most of existing studies that focus on discrete-valued sequences with perfect distribution match, we study multiple classification for continuous sequences with distribution uncertainty, where the generating distributions of the testing and training sequences deviate even under the true hypothesis. In particular, we propose distribution free tests and prove that the error probabilities of our tests decay exponentially fast for three different test designs: fixed-length, sequential, and two-phase tests. We first consider the simple case without the null hypothesis, where the testing sequence is known to be generated from a distribution close to the generating distribution of one of the training sequences. Subsequently, we generalize our results to a more general case with the null hypothesis by allowing the testing sequence to be generated from a distribution that is vastly different from the generating distributions of all training sequences.

Authors (2)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. H. Chernoff, “A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 23, pp. 493–507, 1952.
  2. R. E. Blahut, “Hypothesis testing and information theory,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 20, pp. 405–417, 1974.
  3. A. Wald and J. Wolfowitz, “Optimum character of the sequential probability ratio test,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, pp. 326–339, 1948.
  4. A. Lalitha and T. Javidi, “On error exponents of almost-fixed-length channel codes and hypothesis tests,” arXiv:2012.00077, 2020.
  5. J. Ziv, “On classification with empirically observed statistics and universal data compression,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 278–286, 1988.
  6. M. Gutman, “Asymptotically optimal classification for multiple tests with empirically observed statistics,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 401–408, 1989.
  7. M. Haghifam, V. Y. Tan, and A. Khisti, “Sequential classification with empirically observed statistics,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 3095–3113, 2021.
  8. C.-Y. Hsu, C.-F. Li, and I.-H. Wang, “On universal sequential classification from sequentially observed empirical statistics,” in IEEE ITW, 2022, pp. 642–647.
  9. L. Bai, J. Diao, and L. Zhou, “Achievable error exponents for almost fixed-length binary classification,” in IEEE ISIT, 2022, pp. 1336–1341.
  10. J. Diao, L. Zhou, and L. Bai, “Achievable error exponents for almost fixed-length M-ary classification,” in IEEE ISIT, 2023, pp. 1568–1573.
  11. H.-W. Hsu and I.-H. Wang, “On binary statistical classification from mismatched empirically observed statistics,” in IEEE ISIT, 2020, pp. 2533–2538.
  12. Q. Li, T. Wang, D. J. Bucci, Y. Liang, B. Chen, and P. K. Varshney, “Nonparametric composite hypothesis testing in an asymptotic regime,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1005–1014, 2018.
  13. S. Zou, Y. Liang, H. V. Poor, and X. Shi, “Nonparametric detection of anomalous data streams,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 65, no. 21, pp. 5785–5797, 2017.
  14. A. Gretton, K. M. Borgwardt, M. J. Rasch, B. Schölkopf, and A. Smola, “A kernel two-sample test,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 723–773, 2012.
  15. Z. Sun and S. Zou, “Kernel robust hypothesis testing,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 2023.
  16. C. McDiarmid et al., “On the method of bounded differences,” Surveys in combinatorics, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 148–188, 1989.
  17. L. Zhou, V. Y. Tan, and M. Motani, “Second-order asymptotically optimal statistical classification,” Information and Inference: A Journal of the IMA, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 81–111, 2020.
  18. Y. Bu, S. Zou, and V. V. Veeravalli, “Linear-complexity exponentially-consistent tests for universal outlying sequence detection,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 2115–2128, 2019.
  19. J. Pan, Y. Li, and V. Y. Tan, “Asymptotics of sequential composite hypothesis testing under probabilistic constraints,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 4998–5012, 2022.
  20. R. R. Tenney and N. R. Sandell, “Detection with distributed sensors,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., no. 4, pp. 501–510, 1981.
  21. J. N. Tsitsiklis, “Decentralized detection by a large number of sensors,” Math. Control Signals Syst., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 167–182, 1988.
  22. L. Kaufman and P. J. Rousseeuw, “Finding groups in data. an introduction to cluster analysis,” Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Applied Probability and Statistics, 1990.
  23. H.-S. Park and C.-H. Jun, “A simple and fast algorithm for k-medoids clustering,” Expert Syst. Appl, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 3336–3341, 2009.

Summary

  • The paper proposes fixed-length, sequential, and two-phase tests that ensure exponentially decaying misclassification probabilities.
  • The sequential test optimizes sample use, achieving superior error performance under distribution uncertainty.
  • The two-phase design offers a balance between computational efficiency and high classification accuracy in real-world applications.

An Overview of "Exponentially Consistent Statistical Classification of Continuous Sequences with Distribution Uncertainty"

The paper "Exponentially Consistent Statistical Classification of Continuous Sequences with Distribution Uncertainty" by Lina Zhu and Lin Zhou provides a comprehensive study on the problem of classifying continuous sequences under distributional uncertainty. The paper diverges from traditional studies focused on discrete-valued sequences and perfect distribution matches by exploring cases where generating distributions between testing and training sequences deviate under the true hypothesis.

The authors propose distribution-free tests that achieve exponentially fast decaying error probabilities, a significant result demonstrated for three different test designs: fixed-length, sequential, and two-phase tests. These tests are devised to cater to the problem of identifying whether a testing sequence is generated from a distribution proximate to one of the MM training sequences given distribution uncertainty.

Problem Formulation and Contributions

The primary problem tackled by the authors is the classification of continuous sequences where the generating distribution faces uncertainty. Traditionally, classification requires exact matches between test and training distributions; however, this paper relaxes this condition, allowing for slight mismatches quantified by a distribution distance metric. This approach accommodates real-world applications where exact distribution matches are impractical.

The paper's main contributions can be summarized as follows:

  1. Fixed-Length Test: The authors first re-contextualize the fixed-length test, extending the results from prior work to cases with different sampling length ratios between training and testing sequences. The authors establish that the misclassification probabilities decay exponentially with an exponent dependent on the difference between minimum inter-cluster and maximum intra-cluster distribution distances.
  2. Sequential Test: The sequential test capitalizes on the flexibility of sample collection, allowing for stopping once a certain reliability threshold is met. The authors show that this test has a superior performance over the fixed-length test, with larger misclassification exponents due to its adaptive nature.
  3. Two-Phase Test: This novel test bridges the performance-complexity gap between fixed-length and sequential tests. It involves two phases with adjustable sample sizes, achieving a compromise that provides near-sequential test performance with fixed-length test complexity.
  4. Null Hypothesis Scenario: Addressing a more general case, the authors incorporate scenarios where testing sequences arise from distributions markedly different from any training sequence. Here, they discuss misclassification and false alarm error events and extend their test designs to maintain exponentially decaying error probabilities.

Numerical Results and Implications

Numerically, the authors demonstrate the misclassification probabilities across different tests and validate the superior performance of the two-phase and sequential tests over the fixed-length test. The numerical results provide clear evidence of the effectiveness of the proposed techniques, highlighting the balance achieved by the two-phase test between error performance and computational complexity.

The implications of this research are multi-faceted:

  • Theoretical Advancements: The paper adds depth to the theoretical understanding of classification under distributional uncertainty, extending ideas beyond discrete sequences to continuous realms.
  • Practical Applications: By designing tests that accommodate distribution mismatches, this work broadens the applicability in fields such as computer vision and pattern recognition where data may not conform to assumed or clean distributions.
  • Future Directions: Speculatively, this research could lead to new algorithms in unsupervised learning, anomaly detection, and statistical signal processing, further exploring use-cases of distribution-free classification.

The authors have concluded with suggestions for ongoing research, such as the exploration of converse results for theoretical optimality and low-complexity test designs for practical implementation.

Overall, Zhu and Zhou's work stands as a significant contribution to the domain of statistical classification, presenting new avenues for understanding and processing continuous data under uncertain distributions.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 3 likes about this paper.