Memory-corrected quantum repeaters with adaptive syndrome identification
Abstract: We address the challenge of incorporating encoded quantum memories into an exact secret key rate analysis for small and intermediate-scale quantum repeaters. To this end, we introduce the check matrix model and quantify the resilience of stabilizer codes of up to eleven qubits against Pauli noise, obtaining analytical expressions for effective logical error probabilities. Generally, we find that the five-qubit and Steane codes either outperform more complex, larger codes in the experimentally relevant parameter regimes or have a lower resource overhead. Subsequently, we apply our results to calculate lower bounds on the asymptotic secret key rate in memory-corrected quantum repeaters when using the five-qubit or Steane codes on the memory qubits. The five-qubit code drastically increases the effective memory coherence time, reducing a phase flip probability of $1\%$ to $0.001\%$ when employing an error syndrome identification adapted to the quantum noise channel. Furthermore, it mitigates the impact of faulty Bell state measurements and imperfect state preparation, lowering the minimally required depolarization parameter for non-zero secret key rates in an eight-segment repeater from $98.4\%$ to $96.4\%$. As a result, the memory-corrected quantum repeater can often generate secret keys in experimental parameter regimes where the unencoded repeater fails to produce a secret key. In an eight-segment repeater, one can even achieve non-vanishing secret key rates up to distances of 2000 km for memory coherence times of $t_c = 10$ s or less using multiplexing. Assuming a zero-distance link-coupling efficiency $p_0 = 0.7$, a depolarization parameter $\mu = 0.99$, $t_c = 10$ s, and an 800 km total repeater length, we obtain a secret key rate of 4.85 Hz, beating both the unencoded repeater that provides 1.25 Hz and ideal twin-field quantum key distribution with 0.71 Hz at GHz clock rates.
- M. Curty, M. Lewenstein, and N. Lütkenhaus, Entanglement as a precondition for secure quantum key distribution., Physical review letters 92 21, 217903 (2003).
- D. Gottesman, Stabilizer codes and quantum error correction (1997).
- M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
- P. Kobel, M. Breyer, and M. Köhl, Deterministic spin-photon entanglement from a trapped ion in a fiber fabry–perot cavity, npj Quantum Information 7, 6 (2021).
- Y. Jing, D. Alsina, and M. Razavi, Quantum key distribution over quantum repeaters with encoding: Using error detection as an effective postselection tool, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 064037 (2020).
- Y. Jing and M. Razavi, Quantum repeaters with encoding on nitrogen-vacancy-center platforms, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 024041 (2022).
- S. Bratzik, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruß, Secret key rates for an encoded quantum repeater, Physical Review A 89, 10.1103/physreva.89.032335 (2014).
- I. Djordjevic, Surface-codes-based quantum communication networks, Entropy 22, 1059 (2020).
- K. Azuma, K. Tamaki, and H.-K. Lo, All-photonic quantum repeaters, Nature Communications 6, 6787 (2015).
- F. Ewert and P. van Loock, Ultrafast fault-tolerant long-distance quantum communication with static linear optics, Phys. Rev. A 95, 012327 (2017).
- F. Ewert, M. Bergmann, and P. van Loock, Ultrafast long-distance quantum communication with static linear optics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 210501 (2016).
- S.-W. Lee, T. C. Ralph, and H. Jeong, Fundamental building block for all-optical scalable quantum networks, Phys. Rev. A 100, 052303 (2019).
- D. Buterakos, E. Barnes, and S. E. Economou, Deterministic generation of all-photonic quantum repeaters from solid-state emitters, Phys. Rev. X 7, 041023 (2017).
- A. N. Glaudell, E. Waks, and J. M. Taylor, Serialized quantum error correction protocol for high-bandwidth quantum repeaters, New Journal of Physics 18, 093008 (2016).
- F. Kesting, F. Fröwis, and W. Dür, Effective noise channels for encoded quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 88, 042305 (2013).
- F. Schmidt and P. van Loock, Memory-assisted long-distance phase-matching quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. A 102, 042614 (2020).
- S. H. Choe and R. Koenig, Long-range data transmission in a fault-tolerant quantum bus architecture (2022), arXiv:2209.09774 [quant-ph] .
- M. Christandl and A. Müller-Hermes, Fault-tolerant coding for quantum communication (2022), arXiv:2009.07161 [quant-ph] .
- E. Shchukin, F. Schmidt, and P. van Loock, Waiting time in quantum repeaters with probabilistic entanglement swapping, Phys. Rev. A 100, 032322 (2019).
- E. Shchukin and P. van Loock, Optimal entanglement swapping in quantum repeaters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 150502 (2022).
- M. F. Mor-Ruiz and W. Dür, Noisy stabilizer formalism, Physical Review A 107, 10.1103/physreva.107.032424 (2023).
- H. Bombin and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Topological quantum distillation, Physical Review Letters 97, 10.1103/physrevlett.97.180501 (2006).
- A. Kubica and M. E. Beverland, Universal transversal gates with color codes: A simplified approach, Phys. Rev. A 91, 032330 (2015).
- A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Annals of Physics 303, 2 (2003).
- S. K. et al, Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code, Nature 605, 669 (2022a).
- Y. Z. et al, Realization of an error-correcting surface code with superconducting qubits, Physical Review Letters 129, 10.1103/physrevlett.129.030501 (2022b).
- B. Zeng, A. Cross, and I. L. Chuang, Transversality versus universality for additive quantum codes (2007), arXiv:0706.1382 [quant-ph] .
- F. Schmidt and P. van Loock, Efficiencies of logical bell measurements on calderbank-shor-steane codes with static linear optics, Phys. Rev. A 99, 062308 (2019).
- E. Knill, Scalable quantum computing in the presence of large detected-error rates, Phys. Rev. A 71, 042322 (2005).
- C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, Theoretical Computer Science 560, 7 (2014).
- J. Lin and N. Lütkenhaus, Simple security analysis of phase-matching measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042332 (2018).
- N. P. Breuckmann and J. N. Eberhardt, Quantum low-density parity-check codes, PRX Quantum 2, 040101 (2021).
- M. Jiang, S. Luo, and S. Fu, Channel-state duality, Phys. Rev. A 87, 022310 (2013).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.