On computational complexity and average-case hardness of shallow-depth boson sampling
Abstract: Boson sampling, a computational task believed to be classically hard to simulate, is expected to hold promise for demonstrating quantum computational advantage using near-term quantum devices. However, noise in experimental implementations poses a significant challenge, potentially rendering boson sampling classically simulable and compromising its classical intractability. Numerous studies have proposed classical algorithms under various noise models that can efficiently simulate boson sampling as noise rates increase with circuit depth. To address this issue particularly related to circuit depth, we explore the viability of achieving quantum computational advantage through boson sampling with shallow-depth linear optical circuits. Specifically, as the average-case hardness of estimating output probabilities of boson sampling is a crucial ingredient in demonstrating its classical intractability, we make progress on establishing the average-case hardness confined to logarithmic-depth regimes. We also obtain the average-case hardness for logarithmic-depth Fock-state boson sampling subject to lossy environments and for the logarithmic-depth Gaussian boson sampling. By providing complexity-theoretical backgrounds for the classical simulation hardness of logarithmic-depth boson sampling, we expect that our findings will mark a crucial step towards a more noise-tolerant demonstration of quantum advantage with shallow-depth boson sampling.
- The computational complexity of linear optics. In Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 333–342, 2011.
- Gaussian boson sampling. Physical review letters, 119(17):170501, 2017.
- Quantum computational advantage via high-dimensional gaussian boson sampling. Science advances, 8(1):eabi7894, 2022.
- Quantum computational advantage using photons. Science, 370(6523):1460–1463, 2020.
- Phase-programmable Gaussian boson sampling using stimulated squeezed light. Physical review letters, 127(18):180502, 2021.
- Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature, 606(7912):75–81, 2022.
- Gaussian boson sampling with pseudo-photon-number-resolving detectors and quantum computational advantage. Physical review letters, 131(15):150601, 2023.
- Classical simulability of noisy boson sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.01953, 2018.
- Efficient classical algorithm for boson sampling with partially distinguishable photons. Physical review letters, 120(22):220502, 2018.
- Valery S Shchesnovich. Noise in boson sampling and the threshold of efficient classical simulatability. Physical Review A, 100(1):012340, 2019.
- Classically simulating near-term partially-distinguishable and lossy boson sampling. Quantum Science and Technology, 5(1):015001, 2019.
- Classical simulation of photonic linear optics with lost particles. New Journal of Physics, 20(9):092002, 2018.
- Simulating boson sampling in lossy architectures. Quantum, 3:169, 2019.
- Regimes of classical simulability for noisy gaussian boson sampling. Physical review letters, 124(10):100502, 2020.
- Classical simulation of linear optics subject to nonuniform losses. Quantum, 4:267, 2020.
- Efficient approximation of experimental gaussian boson sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.11525, 2021.
- The boundary for quantum advantage in gaussian boson sampling. Science advances, 8(4):eabl9236, 2022.
- On classical simulation algorithms for noisy boson sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11532, 2023.
- Tensor network algorithm for simulating experimental gaussian boson sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.03709, 2023.
- The complexity of bipartite gaussian boson sampling. Quantum, 6:863, 2022.
- Noise and the frontier of quantum supremacy. In 2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 1308–1317. IEEE, 2022.
- Complexity-theoretic foundations of bosonsampling with a linear number of modes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.00286, 2023.
- Random unitary matrices. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 27(12):4235, 1994.
- Direct dialling of haar random unitary matrices. New journal of physics, 19(3):033007, 2017.
- Daniel J Brod. Complexity of simulating constant-depth bosonsampling. Physical Review A, 91(4):042316, 2015.
- Guifré Vidal. Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations. Physical review letters, 91(14):147902, 2003.
- Efficient sampling from shallow gaussian quantum-optical circuits with local interactions. Physical Review A, 105(5):052412, 2022.
- Dynamical phase transitions in sampling complexity. Physical review letters, 121(3):030501, 2018.
- Classical simulation of boson sampling based on graph structure. Physical Review Letters, 128(19):190501, 2022.
- Scalable implementation of boson sampling with trapped ions. Physical review letters, 112(5):050504, 2014.
- Scalable and programmable phononic network with trapped ions. Nature Physics, pages 1–7, 2023.
- On the complexity and verification of quantum random circuit sampling. Nature Physics, 15(2):159–163, 2019.
- Ramis Movassagh. The hardness of random quantum circuits. Nature Physics, pages 1–6, 2023.
- Quantum supremacy and hardness of estimating output probabilities of quantum circuits. In 2021 IEEE 62nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 1296–1307. IEEE, 2022.
- Hari Krovi. Average-case hardness of estimating probabilities of random quantum circuits with a linear scaling in the error exponent. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.05642, 2022.
- Kaleidoscope: An efficient, learnable representation for all structured linear maps. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.14966, 2020.
- Exploring shallow-depth boson sampling: Towards scalable quantum supremacy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.10671, 2023.
- Larry Stockmeyer. On approximation algorithms for# p. SIAM Journal on Computing, 14(4):849–861, 1985.
- Seinosuke Toda. Pp is as hard as the polynomial-time hierarchy. SIAM Journal on Computing, 20(5):865–877, 1991.
- Boson sampling from a gaussian state. Physical review letters, 113(10):100502, 2014.
- Keisuke Fujii. Noise threshold of quantum supremacy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.03632, 2016.
- A one-way quantum computer. Physical review letters, 86(22):5188, 2001.
- Universal blind quantum computation. In 2009 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 517–526. IEEE, 2009.
- Unified derivations of measurement-based schemes for quantum computation. Physical Review A, 71(3):032318, 2005.
- A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. nature, 409(6816):46–52, 2001.
- Emanuel Knill. Quantum gates using linear optics and postselection. Physical Review A, 66(5):052306, 2002.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.