Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Specific Wasserstein divergence between continuous martingales

Published 30 Apr 2024 in math.PR | (2404.19672v2)

Abstract: Defining a divergence between the laws of continuous martingales is a delicate task, owing to the fact that these laws tend to be singular to each other. An important idea, put forward by N. Gantert, is to instead consider a scaling limit of the relative entropy between such continuous martingales sampled over a finite time grid. This gives rise to the concept of specific relative entropy. In order to develop a general theory of divergences between continuous martingales, it is only natural to replace the role of the relative entropy in this construction by a different notion of discrepancy between finite dimensional probability distributions. In the present work we take a first step in this direction, taking a power $p$ of the Wasserstein distance instead of the relative entropy. We call the newly obtained scaling limit the specific $p$-Wasserstein divergence. In our first main result we prove that the specific $p$-Wasserstein divergence is well-defined, exhibit an explicit expression for it in terms of the quadratic variations of the martingales involved, and compare it with the specific relative entropy and adapted Wasserstein distance on a class of SDEs. Next we consider the specific $p$-Wasserstein divergence optimization over the set of win-martingales. In our second main result we characterize the solution of this optimization problem for all $p>0$ and, somewhat surprisingly, we single out the case $p=1/2$ as the one with the best probabilistic properties. For instance, the optimal martingale in this case is very explicit and can be connected to the solution of a variant of the Schr\"odinger problem.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (58)
  1. Causal optimal transport and its links to enlargement of filtrations and continuous-time stochastic optimization. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 130(5):2918–2953, 2020.
  2. D. Aldous. What is the max-entropy win-probability martingale? https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/aldous/Research/OP/maxentmg.html.
  3. D. J. Aldous. Using prediction market data to illustrate undergraduate probability. Amer. Math. Monthly, 120(7):583–593, 2013.
  4. The mean field Schrödinger problem: ergodic behavior, entropy estimates and functional inequalities. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 178(1):475–530, 2020.
  5. Adapted Wasserstein distances and stability in mathematical finance. Finance Stoch., 24(3):601–632, 2020.
  6. Adapted Wasserstein distances and stability in mathematical finance. Finance and Stochastics, 24(3):601–632, 2020.
  7. J. Backhoff-Veraguas and M. Beiglböck. The most exciting game. Electronic Communications in Probability, 29(none):1 – 12, 2024.
  8. Martingale Benamou–Brenier. The Annals of Probability, 48(5):2258–2289, 2020.
  9. Causal transport in discrete time and applications. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 27(4):2528–2562, 2017.
  10. The structure of martingale Benamou−--Brenier in ℝdsuperscriptℝ𝑑\mathbb{R}^{d}blackboard_R start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_d end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT. arXiv:2306.11019, June 2023.
  11. Nonexponential Sanov and Schilder theorems on Wiener space: BSDEs, Schrödinger problems and control. Ann. Appl. Probab., 30(3):1321–1367, 2020.
  12. J. Backhoff-Veraguas and C. Unterberger. On the specific relative entropy between martingale diffusions on the line. Electron. Commun. Probab., 28:Paper No. 37, 12, 2023.
  13. The Wasserstein space of stochastic processes. arXiv:2104.14245, Apr. 2021.
  14. D. Bartl and J. Wiesel. Sensitivity of multiperiod optimization problems with respect to the adapted wasserstein distance. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 14(2):704–720, 2023.
  15. Optimal transport and Skorokhod embedding. Invent. Math., 208(2):327–400, 2017.
  16. Model-independent bounds for option prices: A mass transport approach. Finance Stoch., 17(3):477–501, 2013.
  17. M. Beiglböck and N. Juillet. On a problem of optimal transport under marginal martingale constraints. Ann. Probab., 44(1):42–106, 2016.
  18. M. Beiglböck and N. Juillet. Shadow couplings. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 374(7):4973–5002, 2021.
  19. Fine properties of the optimal Skorokhod embedding problem. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 24(4):1389–1429, 2022.
  20. Complete duality for martingale optimal transport on the line. Ann. Probab., 45(5):3038–3074, 2017.
  21. An entropy minimization approach to second-order variational mean-field games. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 29(8):1553–1583, 2019.
  22. B. Bouchard and M. Nutz. Arbitrage and duality in nondominated discrete-time models. Ann. Appl. Probab., 25(2):823–859, 2015.
  23. On the relation between optimal transport and Schrödinger bridges: a stochastic control viewpoint. J. Optim. Theory Appl., 169(2):671–691, 2016.
  24. G. Conforti. A second order equation for Schrödinger bridges with applications to the hot gas experiment and entropic transportation cost. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 174(1-2):1–47, 2019.
  25. Y. Dolinsky and H. M. Soner. Martingale optimal transport and robust hedging in continuous time. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 160(1-2):391–427, 2014.
  26. S. Eckstein. Extended laplace principle for empirical measures of a markov chain. Advances in Applied Probability, 51(1):136–167, 2019.
  27. A. Figalli and F. Glaudo. An invitation to optimal transport, Wasserstein distances, and gradient flows. EMS Textbooks in Mathematics. EMS Press, Berlin, 2021.
  28. H. Föllmer. Optimal couplings on Wiener space and an extension of Talagrand’s transport inequality. In Stochastic analysis, filtering, and stochastic optimization, pages 147–175. Springer, Cham, [2022] ©2022.
  29. H. Föllmer and I. Penner. Convex risk measures and the dynamics of their penalty functions. Statistics & Risk Modeling, 24(1):61–96, 2006.
  30. A stochastic control approach to no-arbitrage bounds given marginals, with an application to lookback options. Ann. Appl. Probab., 24(1):312–336, 2014.
  31. N. Gantert. Einige grosse Abweichungen der Brownschen Bewegung. Bonner mathematische Schriften. Mathematischen Institut der Universität, 1991.
  32. N. Gozlan and C. Léonard. Transport inequalities. A survey. Markov Process. Related Fields, 16(4):635–736, 2010.
  33. Randomness and early termination: what makes a game exciting? arXiv:2306.07133, June 2023.
  34. I. Guo and G. Loeper. Path dependent optimal transport and model calibration on exotic derivatives. The Annals of Applied Probability, 31(3):1232–1263, 2021.
  35. P. Henry-Labordere. From (martingale) Schrödinger bridges to a new class of stochastic volatility model. Available at SSRN 3353270, 2019.
  36. D. Hobson and A. Neuberger. Robust bounds for forward start options. Math. Finance, 22(1):31–56, 2012.
  37. D. G. Hobson. Volatility misspecification, option pricing and superreplication via coupling. Annals of Applied Probability, pages 193–205, 1998.
  38. M. Huesmann and D. Trevisan. A Benamou–Brenier formulation of martingale optimal transport. Bernoulli, 25(4A):2729 – 2757, 2019.
  39. R. L. Karandikar. On pathwise stochastic integration. Stochastic Processes and their applications, 57(1):11–18, 1995.
  40. I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve. Brownian motion and stochastic calculus, volume 113 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1991.
  41. D. Lacker. A non-exponential extension of Sanov’s theorem via convex duality. Advances in Applied Probability, 52(1):61–101, 2020.
  42. R. Lassalle. Causal transport plans and their Monge–Kantorovich problems. Stochastic Analysis and Applications, 36(3):452–484, 2018.
  43. C. Léonard. A survey of the Schrödinger problem and some of its connections with optimal transport. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 34(4):1533–1574, 2014.
  44. Reciprocal processes. A measure-theoretical point of view. Probab. Surv., 11:237–269, 2014.
  45. G. Loeper. Option pricing with linear market impact and nonlinear Black–Scholes equations. The Annals of Applied Probability, 28(5):2664–2726, 2018.
  46. M. Montero. Merge of two oppositely biased Wiener processes. arXiv e-prints, page arXiv:2303.18088, Mar. 2023.
  47. M. Nutz and J. Wiesel. On the martingale Schrödinger bridge between two distributions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.05209, 2024.
  48. Martingale Schrödinger bridges and optimal semistatic portfolios. Finance and Stochastics, 27(1):233–254, 2023.
  49. S. Pal and T.-K. L. Wong. Multiplicative Schrödinger problem and the Dirichlet transport. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 178(1-2):613–654, 2020.
  50. G. Pflug. Version-independence and nested distributions in multistage stochastic optimization. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 20(3):1406–1420, 2009.
  51. G. Pflug and A. Pichler. A distance for multistage stochastic optimization models. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 22(1):1–23, 2012.
  52. F. Santambrogio. Optimal transport for applied mathematicians, volume 87 of Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications. Birkhäuser Cham, 2015. Calculus of variations, PDEs, and modeling.
  53. E. Schrödinger. Über die umkehrung der naturgesetze. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Physikalisch-mathematische Klasse, 1931.
  54. E. Schrödinger. Sur la théorie relativiste de l’électron et l’interprétation de la mécanique quantique. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, 2(4):269–310, 1932.
  55. X. Tan and N. Touzi. Optimal transportation under controlled stochastic dynamics. The annals of probability, pages 3201–3240, 2013.
  56. J. L. Vázquez. The porous medium equation. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007. Mathematical theory.
  57. C. Villani. Topics in optimal transportation. Number 58. American Mathematical Soc., 2003.
  58. C. Villani. Optimal transport: old and new, volume 338. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 0 likes about this paper.