Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Modeling nonlinear scales with COLA: preparing for LSST-Y1

Published 18 Apr 2024 in astro-ph.CO and gr-qc | (2404.12344v2)

Abstract: Year 1 results of the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) will provide tighter constraints on small-scale cosmology, beyond the validity of linear perturbation theory. This heightens the demand for a computationally affordable prescription that can accurately capture nonlinearities in beyond-$\Lambda$CDM models. The COmoving Lagrangian Acceleration (COLA) method, a cost-effective \textit{N}-body technique, has been proposed as a viable alternative to high-resolution \textit{N}-body simulations for training emulators of the nonlinear matter power spectrum. In this study, we evaluate this approach by employing COLA emulators to conduct a cosmic shear analysis with LSST-Y1 simulated data across three different nonlinear scale cuts. We use the $w$CDM model, for which the \textsc{EuclidEmulator2} (\textsc{ee2}) exists as a benchmark, having been trained with high-resolution \textit{N}-body simulations. We primarily utilize COLA simulations with mass resolution $M_{\rm part}\approx 8 \times 10{10} ~h{-1} M_{\odot}$ and force resolution $\ell_{\rm force}=0.5 ~h{-1}$Mpc, though we also test refined settings with $M_{\rm part}\approx 1 \times 10{10} ~h{-1}M_{\odot}$ and force resolution $\ell_{\rm force}=0.17 ~h{-1}$Mpc. We find the performance of the COLA emulators is sensitive to the placement of high-resolution \textit{N}-body reference samples inside the prior, which only ensure agreement in their local vicinity. However, the COLA emulators pass stringent criteria in goodness-of-fit and parameter bias throughout the prior, when $\Lambda$CDM predictions of \textsc{ee2} are computed alongside every COLA emulator prediction, suggesting a promising approach for extended models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. R. Mandelbaum, Weak Lensing for Precision Cosmology, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 56, 393 (2018), arXiv:1710.03235 [astro-ph.CO] .
  2. E. J. Ruiz and D. Huterer, Testing the dark energy consistency with geometry and growth, Physical Review D 91, 10.1103/physrevd.91.063009 (2015).
  3. D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram, The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS). Part II: Approximation schemes, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2011 (7), 034, arXiv:1104.2933 [astro-ph.CO] .
  4. P. McDonald, Clustering of dark matter tracers: Renormalizing the bias parameters, Phys. Rev. D 74, 103512 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0609413 [astro-ph] .
  5. P. McDonald and A. Roy, Clustering of dark matter tracers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2009 (8), 020, arXiv:0902.0991 [astro-ph.CO] .
  6. J. J. M. Carrasco, M. P. Hertzberg, and L. Senatore, The effective field theory of cosmological large scale structures, Journal of High Energy Physics 2012, 82 (2012), arXiv:1206.2926 [astro-ph.CO] .
  7. Z. Vlah, M. White, and A. Aviles, A Lagrangian effective field theory, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (9), 014, arXiv:1506.05264 [astro-ph.CO] .
  8. L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, The IR-resummed Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2015 (2), 013, arXiv:1404.5954 [astro-ph.CO] .
  9. M. Lewandowski and L. Senatore, An analytic implementation of the IR-resummation for the BAO peak, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2020 (3), 018, arXiv:1810.11855 [astro-ph.CO] .
  10. S.-F. Chen, Z. Vlah, and M. White, Consistent Modeling of Velocity Statistics and Redshift-Space Distortions in One-Loop Perturbation Theory, JCAP 07, 062, arXiv:2005.00523 [astro-ph.CO] .
  11. G. D’Amico, L. Senatore, and P. Zhang, Limits on wCDM from the EFTofLSS with the PyBird code, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (1), 006, arXiv:2003.07956 [astro-ph.CO] .
  12. A. Chudaykin, K. Dolgikh, and M. M. Ivanov, Constraints on the curvature of the Universe and dynamical dark energy from the Full-shape and BAO data, Phys. Rev. D 103, 023507 (2021), arXiv:2009.10106 [astro-ph.CO] .
  13. A. Glanville, C. Howlett, and T. M. Davis, Full-shape galaxy power spectra and the curvature tension, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 517, 3087 (2022), arXiv:2205.05892 [astro-ph.CO] .
  14. M. M. Ivanov and S. Sibiryakov, Infrared resummation for biased tracers in redshift space, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (7), 053, arXiv:1804.05080 [astro-ph.CO] .
  15. H. A. Winther et al., Modified Gravity N-body Code Comparison Project, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 454, 4208 (2015), arXiv:1506.06384 [astro-ph.CO] .
  16. S. Bird, M. Viel, and M. G. Haehnelt, Massive Neutrinos and the Non-linear Matter Power Spectrum, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 420, 2551 (2012), arXiv:1109.4416 [astro-ph.CO] .
  17. K. Heitmann et al., The Mira–Titan Universe: Precision Predictions for Dark Energy Surveys, Astrophys. J. 820, 108 (2016), arXiv:1508.02654 [astro-ph.CO] .
  18. T. Nishimichi et al., Dark Quest. I. Fast and Accurate Emulation of Halo Clustering Statistics and Its Application to Galaxy Clustering, Astrophys. J. 884, 29 (2019), arXiv:1811.09504 [astro-ph.CO] .
  19. R. Mauland, H. A. Winther, and C.-Z. Ruan, Sesame: A power spectrum emulator pipeline for beyond-ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM models, arXiv e-prints  (2023), arXiv:2309.13295 [astro-ph.CO] .
  20. B. Fiorini, K. Koyama, and T. Baker, Fast production of cosmological emulators in modified gravity: the matter power spectrum, JCAP 12, 045, arXiv:2310.05786 [astro-ph.CO] .
  21. H. Sletmoen and H. A. Winther, A simple prediction of the non-linear matter power spectrum in Brans-Dicke gravity from linear theory, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2403.03786 (2024), arXiv:2403.03786 [astro-ph.CO] .
  22. I. n. Sáez-Casares, Y. Rasera, and B. Li, The e-MANTIS emulator: fast predictions of the non-linear matter power spectrum in f⁢(R)𝑓𝑅f(R)italic_f ( italic_R )CDM cosmology, arXiv e-prints  (2023), arXiv:2303.08899 [astro-ph.CO] .
  23. D. Potter, J. Stadel, and R. Teyssier, PKDGRAV3: beyond trillion particle cosmological simulations for the next era of galaxy surveys, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology 4, 2 (2017), arXiv:1609.08621 [astro-ph.IM] .
  24. R. E. Angulo and S. D. M. White, One simulation to fit them all - changing the background parameters of a cosmological N-body simulation, Mon. Not. of the Royal Astron. Soc. 405, 143 (2010), arXiv:0912.4277 [astro-ph.CO] .
  25. S. Tassev, M. Zaldarriaga, and D. Eisenstein, Solving Large Scale Structure in Ten Easy Steps with COLA, JCAP 06, 036, arXiv:1301.0322 [astro-ph.CO] .
  26. R. W. Hockney and J. W. Eastwood, Computer simulation using particles (1988).
  27. A. Izard, M. Crocce, and P. Fosalba, ICE-COLA: Towards fast and accurate synthetic galaxy catalogues optimizing a quasi N𝑁Nitalic_N-body method, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 459, 2327 (2016), arXiv:1509.04685 [astro-ph.CO] .
  28. J. Adamek et al. (Euclid), Euclid: Modelling massive neutrinos in cosmology – a code comparison, JCAP 06, 035, arXiv:2211.12457 [astro-ph.CO] .
  29. G. Valogiannis and R. Bean, Efficient simulations of large scale structure in modified gravity cosmologies with comoving Lagrangian acceleration, Phys. Rev. D 95, 103515 (2017), arXiv:1612.06469 [astro-ph.CO] .
  30. G. Brando, K. Koyama, and H. A. Winther, Revisiting Vainshtein screening for fast N-body simulations, JCAP 06, 045, arXiv:2303.09549 [astro-ph.CO] .
  31. M. Crocce, S. Pueblas, and R. Scoccimarro, Transients from Initial Conditions in Cosmological Simulations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 373, 369 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0606505 .
  32. R. E. Angulo and O. Hahn, Large-scale dark matter simulations, Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics 8, 10.1007/s41115-021-00013-z (2022).
  33. G. Brando, K. Koyama, and D. Wands, Relativistic Corrections to the Growth of Structure in Modified Gravity, JCAP 01, 013, arXiv:2006.11019 [astro-ph.CO] .
  34. J. Lesgourgues, The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1104.2932 (2011), arXiv:1104.2932 [astro-ph.IM] .
  35. J. Brandbyge and S. Hannestad, Grid Based Linear Neutrino Perturbations in Cosmological N-body Simulations, JCAP 05, 002, arXiv:0812.3149 [astro-ph] .
  36. R. E. Angulo and A. Pontzen, Cosmological N𝑁Nitalic_N-body simulations with suppressed variance, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 462, L1 (2016), arXiv:1603.05253 [astro-ph.CO] .
  37. D. Baumann, D. Green, and B. Wallisch, Searching for light relics with large-scale structure, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (8), 029, arXiv:1712.08067 [astro-ph.CO] .
  38. X. Fang, T. Eifler, and E. Krause, 2D-FFTLog: efficient computation of real-space covariance matrices for galaxy clustering and weak lensing, Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc. 497, 2699 (2020), arXiv:2004.04833 [astro-ph.CO] .
  39. M. A. Troxel and M. Ishak, The intrinsic alignment of galaxies and its impact on weak gravitational lensing in an era of precision cosmology, Physics Reports 558, 1 (2015), arXiv:1407.6990 [astro-ph.CO] .
  40. E. Krause and T. Eifler, cosmolike – cosmological likelihood analyses for photometric galaxy surveys, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 470, 2100 (2017), arXiv:1601.05779 [astro-ph.CO] .
  41. A. Lewis, Efficient sampling of fast and slow cosmological parameters, Phys. Rev. D 87, 103529 (2013), arXiv:1304.4473 [astro-ph.CO] .
  42. J. Torrado and A. Lewis, Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models, JCAP 05, 057, arXiv:2005.05290 [astro-ph.IM] .
  43. A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and A. Lasenby, Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models, Astrophys. J.  538, 473 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9911177 [astro-ph] .
  44. B. Dai, Y. Feng, and U. Seljak, A gradient based method for modeling baryons and matter in halos of fast simulations, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (11), 009, arXiv:1804.00671 [astro-ph.CO] .
  45. D. Lanzieri, F. Lanusse, and J.-L. Starck, Hybrid Physical-Neural ODEs for Fast N-body Simulations, in Machine Learning for Astrophysics (2022) p. 60, arXiv:2207.05509 [astro-ph.CO] .
  46. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1412.6980 (2014), arXiv:1412.6980 [cs.LG] .
  47. G. Blatman and B. Sudret, An adaptive algorithm to build up sparse polynomial chaos expansions for stochastic finite element analysis, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 25, 183–197 (2010).
  48. G. Blatman and B. Sudret, Adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansion based on least angle regression, Journal of Computational Physics 230, 2345–2367 (2011).
  49. N. Lüthen, S. Marelli, and B. Sudret, Automatic selection of basis-adaptive sparse polynomial chaos expansions for engineering applications, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2009.04800 (2020), arXiv:2009.04800 [stat.CO] .
  50. S. Marelli and B. Sudret, An active-learning algorithm that combines sparse polynomial chaos expansions and bootstrap for structural reliability analysis, Structural Safety 75, 67–74 (2018).
  51. A. Kaintura, T. Dhaene, and D. Spina, Review of polynomial chaos-based methods for uncertainty quantification in modern integrated circuits, Electronics 7, 30 (2018).
Citations (1)

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Paper to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this paper yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.